Guest Loss Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Whose info was that? This is the first I've heard of it.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Pm'ing thread. ....snitch
{''({o..o})''} Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Pretty sure the statutes of limitation expired anyway.
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Pretty sure the statutes of limitation expired anyway. Who the fuck are you, Miles Lane?
Black Lushus Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Ripper you black bastard! now I gotta move!
Slayer Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 This is what Black Lushus really looks like and a picture of the inside of Black Lushus's home. She's got some maaaad hos
kkktookmybabyaway Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Should I be glad I have no idea what this thread is about? And Lushus, what are you doing Saturday night? I promise to have you back before SpongeBob...
Black Lushus Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 I've actually used my child to flirt with women...is that bad?
kkktookmybabyaway Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 As long as you don't include Lushus Jr. with the bedroom activity, I see no problem with it...
Slayer Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 I believe it's Lushusette..... or whatever
Black Lushus Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 I believe it's Lushusette..... or whatever correct!
Giuseppe Zangara Posted January 8, 2005 Report Posted January 8, 2005 Chris Coey is pretty funny in that bloody stool thread.
Dr. Tom Posted January 8, 2005 Report Posted January 8, 2005 Stuff like this will not be tolerated. Privacy rights and the like might not be well-defined in the age of the internet, but posting someone's personal information -- and that of their parents -- on a messageboard is beyond the pale. Even if you dislike someone, getting their parents involved is shitty, cowardly, and childish, and it is NOT going to fly around here. For the record, Chris Coey is allowed to post here again because he was a staff writer for TSM. Sass and I felt it was unfair for him to have a column, but no voice in the forums to deal with the feedback his columns would inevitably generate. Even though he doesn't write for TSM currently, I'm not going to throw him under the bus for something he said two years ago.
Red Hot Thumbtack In The Eye Posted January 8, 2005 Report Posted January 8, 2005 check out the Paul-London.com thread in classics. Ban Nik.
Nighthawk Posted January 8, 2005 Report Posted January 8, 2005 Tom, it's not cowardly. That's number one on my list of words I'm out to correct the usage of, slightly ahead of literally and wherefore.
Ripper Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 Tom, it's not cowardly. That's number one on my list of words I'm out to correct the usage of, slightly ahead of literally and wherefore. Who the fuck says wherefore. Literally no one says that.
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 IDRM is abandoning his quest to correct all wrong spellings of "bestiality."
The Czech Republic Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 Chris Coey is allowed to post here again because he was a staff writer for TSM. http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?showforum=75
Guest Loss Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 So what? Double standards are fine. This isn't a democracy. The mods can do whatever they want whenever they want, and you are required to like it or post elsewhere. Those are your only choices.
Giuseppe Zangara Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 Czech, you really care too much about this place.
The Czech Republic Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 I was just saying. (I liked Anglesault.)
Guest Vitamin X Posted January 11, 2005 Report Posted January 11, 2005 For the record, Chris Coey is allowed to post here again because he was a staff writer for TSM. Sass and I felt it was unfair for him to have a column, but no voice in the forums to deal with the feedback his columns would inevitably generate. Even though he doesn't write for TSM currently, I'm not going to throw him under the bus for something he said two years ago. He has a forum in which to deal with that, it's called email as well as addressing it publicly through the columns he writes.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now