Heidenreich/Taker Feud..

[natey2k4 0]

Now knowing the match will most likely suck almost similiar to a Taker/Yoko casket match... who can actually ADMIT they liked the Heidenriech/Taker segment on Smackdown? It actually made me a bit interested in wanting to see who wins.. not the actual match itself. It its kept short, who knows, maybe it will be decent.

[bob_barron 0]

I have a feeling that the Undertaker is probably gonna win the match.

 

Just a hunch

[The Amazing Rando 0]

Meh... if JannetyTaker comes out to avenge his death, that's worth 35 bucks right there. Especially if Taker sells it like he did the first time he saw...

 

 

KAAAANE~!

[Guest The Shadow Behind You]

I think the fun part will be the "Run In" drinking game.

[Placebo Effect 0]

I enjoyed it, overacting aside.

[brighty 0]

can actually see Heidenreich winning this, with help from (don't throw up here) Snitsky, leading to Kane&Taker v. Snitsky&Heidenreich at WMXXI

[Dobbs 3K 0]

I haven't been excited about it since Heidenreich has basically been booked to look like a pussy since the start of this feud. It would've been better if they had booked Heidenreich to look like an unstoppable monster who could easily beat Undertaker and even end 'Taker's career. As it stands right now, it seems like a forgone conclusion that Undertaker will win, so it's not very interesting. It's like pretty much every other feud 'Taker has had in his career.

[Guest Phenom]

I think Heidenreich will win it, just because they're making Taker to look unstopable against him.

[CBright7831 0]

I actually enjoyed the Yoko/Undertaker Royal Rumble casket match.

 

Not due to the in ring work, but due to 500 workers running int othe match and Undertaker STILL getting up to fight.

[RavishingRickRudo 0]

So Snitsky helps Heidenreich and Heidenreich helps Snitsky, and they both kill Kane and Taker, who then both fly into the sky (played by Val Venis and Stevie Richards).

 

I've enjoyed the matches, they need to cut about 5-10 minutes off them, but other than that I enjoy them. The feud sucks though. I have no idea why they're fighting. Heidenreich would have been better as the frozen Nazi, and Taker must destroy him because Nazis are bad.

[Sideburnious 0]

I haven't been watching so I can't say either way. If I did watch it probbaly wouldn't bother me.

[Vyce 0]

The Taker / Heidenreich feud is easily the worst feud of 2004 (and is treading into 2005 territory). YES, worse than Snitsky / Lita.

 

For the precise reasons Invader elaborated on.....we have Heidenreich, who we are led to believe is this evil, psychotic human being, who is dangerous and violent - and yet the only individuals he seems capable of beating up are cruisers and Michael Cole. Every time he's faced Taker he's either lost or, even more damaging, been booked to look so terrified of Taker that he'll quit the match and just leave.

 

There's not much they can get out of Heidenreich OTHER than to book him as a monster, but they're destroying all of that right off to bat by booking him as a pussy and a stooge, to put over the Undertaker, who doesn't need ANYONE to put him over at this point in his career (and who SHOULD be using his name value, at this point, to make the careers of others).

[Guest Tjhe CyNick]

I think if you're a fan of the Deadman Taker gimmick then you might like the program. Its essentially a throwback to the old days where Taker would program with big stiffs, and eventually put them in a Casket.

 

I dont think it sbeen horrible, but it hasn't made me want to watch SD. Heidenreich is like Snitsky in that he's meant to be a big scary character, but I just find myself laughing at the guy. Its entertainment, but not what they are going for.

 

I kinda have a feeling the Taker-Heidenreich deal will end at the Rumble, because I cant see Taker agreeing to that proposed tag match with Kane. I figure he'll want to be in a higher profile match than that. So with that in mind, I think it'll be Tombstone and Casket time for Heidy.

[Lil' Bitch 0]

Easily the worst Taker feud since Mabel so not me.

[Use Your Illusion 0]

I enjoyed it, overacting aside.

You did not.

[Nighthawk 0]

I haven't been watching so I can't say either way. If I did watch it probbaly wouldn't bother me.

This post was absolutely essential.

[Use Your Illusion 0]

Irony

[Nighthawk 0]

Intentional.

[jester 0]

I haven't enjoyed watching the Undertaker for a very long time. But seriously, it would be stupid at this point to have him do anything but squash Heidenreich. Taker has dominated the entire feud and it doesn't make sense that Take would lose, even if Heidenreich did massive cheating.

[Jingus 0]

I like the feud.

 

And I'm not kidding when I say that.

 

 

 

 

My reasoning: Heidenreich sucks. Big-time. He's a really, really bad wrestler. Undertaker, due to a combination of age, injuries, gimmick, and booking, also sucks. Therefore, I'd much rather have these two suckers be programmed into a permanent feud with each other, rather than squashing and ruining the careers of the actual GOOD wrestlers on the payroll. Fast-forwarding thru a Taker/Reich match is a lot more painless than wondering if that Paul London fella might've been any good if he hadn't Had That Feud With Taker And Then Left The Company.

[Just call me Dan 0]

I think Heidenreich will win it, just because they're making Taker to look unstopable against him.

Yeah, just like DDP did, right?

[Nighthawk 0]

DDP was an old man from wcw.

[Just call me Dan 0]

DDP was an old man from wcw.

Right, Heidenreich is leagues better than Page ever was. More deserving of the spot too.

[Twisted Intestine 0]

I rarely watch SD, but from what I have seen I could tell you that I wouldn't want to see anymore.

 

The Kane/Snitsky feud on the other hand, I actually have been enjoying.. and I actually thought their No Holds Barred match on RAW was decent. Shouldn't have been the main event, but it was nothing to be doing the wave over.

[Guest Trivia247]

Unfortunately of this feud im not getting much of a decent vibe.

 

They are running the same program Undertakers beats on Heidenreich until he runs away.

 

At least with heyman there you had a reasoned dynamic as why Heidenreich got involved with Taker at all. However with him not much in the picture anymore this like a car wreck

 

I prefer the Casket match with Kamala....Just because Kamala's reaction to the Coffin was the funnest stuff I ever seen.

[Nighthawk 0]

DDP was an old man from wcw.

Right, Heidenreich is leagues better than Page ever was. More deserving of the spot too.

That's their perspective, not mine. I've never even seen the guy.

[Just call me Dan 0]

DDP was an old man from wcw.

Right, Heidenreich is leagues better than Page ever was. More deserving of the spot too.

That's their perspective, not mine. I've never even seen the guy.

What could you possibly have to add to this thread, then?

[Use Your Illusion 0]

DDP is legions better than Heidenreich now, and he's 87

[Just call me Dan 0]

DDP is legions better than Heidenreich now, and he's 87

As much as I have a hard time letting go of people I never thought got to where they should have, DDP could not produce much of anything ever again in WWE gien his age, health and complete burial in the WWE 3 years ago.

 

At that moment when it all went down, old man or not, DDP could have done so much more than he was given. He could have been a success. Denying that is the same as saying Bret Hart was finished and wasn't worth a dime when he left WWF for WCW. What was done to him killed his career and tooke away the few years he still could have kicked serious ass.

[Guest Trivia247]

DDP is legions better than Heidenreich now, and he's 87

definately agree with that

 

Heidenreich can be any age, but age doesn't mean experience

 

DDP had experience loads of it, and have been a Main fixture in WCW so when he came over you'd think they could find a more inspiring intro angle for him than to be fed to the Undertaker to beat on