Warrior goes insane at UConn!

[Nighthawk 0]

After he made a comment about how homosexuals are nowhere near on the same level as heterosexuals, which elicited an "oh my god" from a female student, he quickly replied with "Don't have an orgasm now honey, save it for later!" And when an obviously gay student started screaming at him from the back of the auditorium, Warrior replied with "I can't hear you with that thing in your mouth."

Ha ha. I love this man.

[King Cucaracha 0]

After he made a comment about how homosexuals are nowhere near on the same level as heterosexuals, which elicited an "oh my god" from a female student, he quickly replied with "Don't have an orgasm now honey, save it for later!" And when an obviously gay student started screaming at him from the back of the auditorium, Warrior replied with "I can't hear you with that thing in your mouth."

Ha ha. I love this man.

Agreed.

 

I have a new found respect for him all of a sudden.

[Guest Trivia247]

Gotta read this..

 

 

The following was submitted by a student who attended the already infamous Warrior speech at the Univesity of Connecticut. This person wishes to be kept annonymous.

 

"Perhaps my first hand account of Warrior's speech at the University of Connecticut will assist your column.

 

In my opinion, what occurred at Konover Auditorium was nothing short of one of the most compelling and dramatic events I have ever participated in. Everyone needs to remember one thing: Warrior was INVITED to come and speak. This is a man who knows his views differ from most everyone's, including other conservatives, and he draws tremendous pride from that.

 

Warrior has always been, and always will be a colorful, candid, and politically incorrect individual who truly does not care what the world around him thinks. One HAS to respect a man who knowingly travels around to campuses to express views that will elicit responses indicative of Tuesday night. I certainly do, and that would be extended for ANY person, regardless of who or what they are.

 

The problem I have with what transpired is the fact that his detractors came to the appearance loaded with their own political/idealogical agenda and decided to railroad Warrior at every point they could. This was a speech, not a debate. The students in question began their attack the moment Warrior iterated concepts that challenged their own.

 

The most vocal of the protesters, Geoff Traugh, took exception to Warrior's statement about the responsibility and rights of life and engaged him in a critical shouting match, which was the defining moment of the evening's degeneration.

 

This is not academic. I've been to school, earned a degree in journalism, and was a member of the critical discourse and debate teams. Some of those students were unified in preparation against Warrior, complete with literature taken out of context from his site, and came to the speech armed against him, while he knew nothing was coming.

 

What type of fair forum is a public, organized attack on an unsuspecting and unprepared guest?

 

Simply stated, Tuesday night was a lesson in the 1st amendment. Textbook. The hypocritical irony is that Warrior was accused of intolerance, when THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE STUDENTS WERE OF HIM, INTOLERANT. A huge wake-up call is in store for anyone who can't handle views such as Warrior's, because when they leave the protective serenity of the university's embrace and get in someone's face because they have a problem with what they believe, an unfortunate realization may come smashing down on them and in their faces.

 

Considering what Warrior was confronted with, I thought he handled himself very well. It was like the mob chasing after the Frankenstein monster with torches and pitchforks because they were afraid of something they weren't familiar with. Killing it rather than learning from it.

 

Do you know what if feels like to be one person, alone, against a room of people screaming at you out of turn? He could have walked off, or physically assaulted someone(and if someone called me a racist, I would), but instead he stood and took it.

 

Once again, just remember Warrior was invited to speak, and those who decided to disrupt it are the ones who should be questioned. Personally, I feel Warrior should be asked to come back and formally enter a debate to rightfully defend himself, PREPAREDLY, like those who acted out were.

 

Just for the record, I certainly DO NOT subscribe to Warrior's ideologies, but I don't have to in order to respect and get along with him. I'm a man who can think for himself. I would defend Warrior's right to speak anytime, anywhere, just like I would for anyone who opposes him, when it's THEIR turn.

 

There was a point when an undercover officer who had been in attendance saw the riotous potential and took to the stage and said, in perhaps THE key moment of the evening. She stated that although she didn't agree with Warrior's speech, she would DIE to protect his opportunity to speak under 1st amendment rights. I had chills. A true moment I will never forget, and neither should anyone in attendance.

 

Tuesday night was a learning experience and a point of maturation that UConn students should hold onto and reflect upon.

 

When tolerance is being used as a political buzzword to hide behind, just make sure everyone is allowed it's coverage, ESPECIALLY those like Warrior. That is what our country stands for."

[MillenniumMan831 0]

I sure as hell wouldn't die for Warrior.

[Styles 0]

Hah. I was planning on going to a convention in DC which had Warrior as one of the featured speakers, but I got sick and didn't go. Too bad, sounds like he's a ball live!

[Guest Trivia247]

that student must be some old mark who is really giving the benefit of a doubt...

 

he didn't really mean queering and didn't tell the iranian to get a towel.... I mean he's the warrior!!!! See I paint my face just like him and everything.

[iliketurtles 0]

One HAS to respect a man who knowingly travels around to campuses to express views that will elicit responses indicative of Tuesday night.

I don't respect someone who goes around to colleges and tells students of Arabic decent to "Get a towel" and "Queering won't make the world work".

 

It's because he's got nothing better to do. And thats' the truth.

 

I have a feeling the guy who wrote that first hand account is actually Warrior.

[Guest Trivia247]

One HAS to respect a man who knowingly travels around to campuses to express views that will elicit responses indicative of Tuesday night.

I don't respect someone who goes around to colleges and tells students of Arabic decent to "Get a towel" and "Queering won't make the world work".

 

It's because he's got nothing better to do. And thats' the truth.

Its not that he has nothing better to do...

 

he is out there Representing the College Republicans damn it!

 

and he needed to get that valuable message out there to all those little warriors who might be lead astray by actually thinking for themselves and for some ungodly reason start developing a .....Tolerance to homosexuals and non White americans..... They must be saved from dem hippy dippy thoughts

[AndrewTS 0]

Awesome. It seems like he was practically as a real life PCU and was speaking on behalf of Balls n' Shaft.

 

"You and all the knee-jerk, bleeding-heart liberals, sipping tea and playing patty-cake. And those useless hippie pot-heads, those commie-pinko leftists. The bunny huggers, the pillow biters..."

 

"Whoa! Whoa! Which ones are the pillow biters again?"

 

"The BUTT-PIRATES! And those beastly man-haters, tell those chicks to shave their pits then call me! And those goddamn whiny crybaby minorities, you can keep them all!"

[Vern Gagne 0]

So these students prepared to hurl insults at someone legally named Warrior? He might be more sane, than some of the protesters.

[BUTT 0]

There is video of this at http://www.okwerdloathe.com/. Click on "123" and you'll see the link.

[The Decemberists 0]

Having watched it I do think it's unfair to really have a go at the Warrior... He says that Homosexuality is below Hetrosexuality because "it doesn't work" and although I somewhat disagree with him, the point is somehow valid as the point of sexuality is to have kids, essentially, and obviously that doesn't happen with homosexuality and therefore he's right saying it "doesn't work" and thus hetrosexuality is 'better', for lack of a better term. He doesn't actually say homosexuality is a bad thing though...

 

And as for the 'racist' comment, all that is is him saying how America is the best country in the world and that American's are the greatest people in the world... which doesn't strike me as being esspecially racist as such.

 

Anyway, regardless of him being right or wrong, to quote Randy Marsh, "hey, I thought this was America!? Oh, I'm sorry I thought this was America!"

[Spaceman Spiff 0]

Having watched it I do think it's unfair to really have a go at the Warrior... He says that Homosexuality is below Hetrosexuality because "it doesn't work" and although I somewhat disagree with him, the point is somehow valid as the point of sexuality is to have kids, essentially, and obviously that doesn't happen with homosexuality and therefore he's right saying it "doesn't work" and thus hetrosexuality is 'better', for lack of a better term. He doesn't actually say homosexuality is a bad thing though...

 

And as for the 'racist' comment, all that is is him saying how America is the best country in the world and that American's are the greatest people in the world... which doesn't strike me as being esspecially racist as such.

 

Anyway, regardless of him being right or wrong, to quote Randy Marsh, "hey, I thought this was America!? Oh, I'm sorry I thought this was America!"

Check out this article from his website

 

Queers don’t make the world work. Marrying them will bring it one step closer to its end.

[Guest Trivia247]

SO...a bunch of strangers, that the Warrior will never meet in his lifetime, that get married, and are gay.....Will Totally Destroy the World as we know it?

[The Decemberists 0]

Having watched it I do think it's unfair to really have a go at the Warrior... He says that Homosexuality is below Hetrosexuality because "it doesn't work" and although I somewhat disagree with him, the point is somehow valid as the point of sexuality is to have kids, essentially, and obviously that doesn't happen with homosexuality and therefore he's right saying it "doesn't work" and thus hetrosexuality is 'better', for lack of a better term. He doesn't actually say homosexuality is a bad thing though...

 

And as for the 'racist' comment, all that is is him saying how America is the best country in the world and that American's are the greatest people in the world... which doesn't strike me as being esspecially racist as such.

 

Anyway, regardless of him being right or wrong, to quote Randy Marsh, "hey, I thought this was America!? Oh, I'm sorry I thought this was America!"

Check out this article from his website

 

Queers don’t make the world work. Marrying them will bring it one step closer to its end.

Ah...

 

 

Now he didn't say during his speach.

 

I stand corrected. Warrior's an idiot.

[Guest M. Harry Smilac]

That guy defending him is a moron.

 

Just watched it and when they first start cutting in is because he's blabbering about 'rights' and making no sense.

He claimed that every right was a responsibility and said a baby earns the right to be born and when they ask him what responsiblities a baby has he just totally dodges it.

 

The guy is a total lunatic douche with some of the most ridiculous views i've ever heard.Just downright painful to listen to.

 

Whoever actually seeks this guy out to do a speech may be the only person on the planet more retarded then Warrior.

[Guest news_gimmick]

Goddamn this is hilarious, Warrior still entertaining us after all these years. Gold.

[Styles 0]

Hah thanks for the video. I really wish they had the Q&A session up too because I bet that was a hoot. Warrior is what he is. I agree with a lot of what his basic ideas are about moral relativism being dangerous and false, but the way he went about antagonizing it was a little strong. But he's anti-PC and self-admittingly so, I respect that. It was funny to hear him making fun of those screaming libs too. I got to say the students were totally disrespectful though. Even if you don't agree with the speaker, he's a guest and you shouldn't be shouting him down and screaming at him while he's making his speech. Anyway, yeah that was funny...

[Gary Floyd 0]

Man, that video was hilarious. What an idiot. However, I also have to say "Fuck You" to the protestors. I'm usually a pretty liberal guy (who supports gay marriage) and I fucking hate hippies.

[Epic Reine 0]

LOL, I love how Warrior gets owned half way through it by some kid when he asked him what does he have to do to earn his right to life as a baby.

[iliketurtles 0]

That was pretty much the point where he lost it.

 

I wish I could of seen the Q&A.

[Special K 0]

His forum is fried gold.

 

You parcel your insults of Warrior in beautiful verbiose....nonetheless they are repugnant to me and a stench in my nostrals you, and the rest of you ilk like liberals. Nonetheless it is my belief you are licking your wounds from philosophical beating you took....at the hands of Warrior. Now let it be said Warrior accomplished his mission, and you fools did not!! SHIT...TRUTH CAME OUT....did you think you could beat Warrior....HOW DID YOU UNDER-ESTIMATE HIM SO BADLY!!?? Better ways to handle it....no this is an ideological battle for the meaning/future of America....and I've got my two caulloused knuckle fists up at the computer screen right now. It's gonna get ugly.

[2GOLD 0]

It's official.

Warrior needs to speak at every college. This guy is a ticket seller. He'd be the Metallica of crazy speeches.

 

Absolutely batty and worth every minute.

[JimmyHendricks 0]

Good Lord. He's at it again. He's now challenging the Campus Republicans to a debate. Please, please, accept!!

 

UConn Retort

 

Anyone who can read the entire thing without having a seizure wins $10,000.

 

04/08/2005: 'UConn  Retort.'

 

Hello warriors. Just got back from being on the road. Empowering and enlightening things occurred this past weekend. I spoke at the Leadership Institute for my friend Dan Flynn (buy his books -- they are GREAT reads destined to be collector's items one day) to a young Conservatives group he had in town for a weekend of training. Spoke at George Washington University on Monday to a small group of young thinkers. And I spoke to at The University of Connecticut for the College Republicans.

 

You’ve heard the most about the last event. Let me respond in brief here about it. I have many projects to attend to now that I am back in NM. My time, and mostly my patience about this UConn event specifically, is limited.

 

Here is a formal press release: UConn Press Release. This was sent out by Mr. Chris Lewis. This clearly and accurately reflects my thoughts on the entire situation. Mr. Lewis works for and with me. He came on board with Project Warrior a few months ago to help me expand and bring about the fruition of my long-worked-on goals. He has not yet been formally introduced. In a couple of days this will be happening at the site. You can find out more about both him and the nature of his involvement with Project Warrior at that time.

 

A couple more words about the UConn event, and then I must be done with it. If you would like fuller details of what went down, look around, there are several accounts - from different perspectives - available out there on the Internet. Many who know about the event have written or called and offered their apologies for what transpired at the University of Connecticut - as if I must be bummed about it all. I appreciate the concerns - I know they are genuine. But I must tell you, concerns such as these are not necessary. Frankly, what happened is incredibly inspiring to me. And it all only affirms for me that my goals are steadily being realized.

 

I do, though, want to extend an extra huge thanks for all the positive, thinking emails - the tons of them. I read them all, but just do not have the time to respond to everyone. Thanks again.

 

I expected the behavior of the liberals. They were, this time, unusually animated but I thought that was great. It didn’t become the fisticuffs I have often hoped for, but maybe next time. Hey, forgive me - I’m a romantic at heart and enjoy nothing like a good fight to bring out the love... Then again, there’s nothing quite like the look in the eye of a radical liberal when he knows his bullshit isn’t stirring up any fear in the person he’s directing it toward. When you witness that realization happening, it’s like seeing Velveeta melt. Maybe it's just that they know that if they throw something at me - whether pies or punches - there’ll be no running except in the direction to catch and pummel their ass myself. Be forewarned liberals -- I don’t know how to pull any punch, physically or intellectually. Of course, in the interest of full disclosure, I say this part facetiously, part seriously-- but it’s up to you, squirrel nuts, to figure out to which side the scale leans more.

 

At UConn, what really drove them over the top even more was that I kept my sense of humor about it, went toe to toe with their disrespect, and kept right on giving my speech. A little advice -- don’t try to out-diss or talk over a guy who’s skilled in doing pro-wrestling promos, especially after he grabs a mike to get the job done even better. And, look, if you expect a guy who’s swam the back-biting, shark-infested waters of pro-wrestling to cower and run for cover just because of some obnoxious personal slights, well, you are just wasting your time. My skin is thin and the meat of my body thick, and my self-confidence runs deep -- real deep. That said, I’m glad those numbnuts showed up. You made for some silly moments and, apparently, it has

come to my attention, have bigger nads than the "Republicans" - or, more accurately, RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) - that brought me in. More on that -- oh, yes, more -- in a minute.

 

You were feisty. Irrationally so, but feisty. And all that was not in vain. Come on, admit it. You left knowing that you need people like me, people who draw an objective moral line between rightand wrong, true and false, good and evil, so that you can go right along and misbehave knowing someone responsible will be there to pick up the broken pieces of your life after you’ve squandered all your chances. Lucky you - even some of those you hate will be the superglue to sustain your existence.

 

Me? I figure what has been willfully and purposely broken over and over, time and time again, maybe needs to be allowed to crush itself into dust so that it can blow away and not have to be dealt with anymore. Imagine that: Life -- something each of us is given the tools to keep together.

 

As for the College Republicans who brought me in, well, I can only tell you that I have an apology to make. I apologize for having just gotten over a small cold as I came on your campus and that I was not capable of smelling your rudeness and cowardice out so that I could have taken you to task for your hypocrisy, phoniness and disrespect in person - right there - to set an even more incredible example of leadership and principled behavior. Ask the Ohio University crowd what happened when the Second Amendment Club President didn’t know The Second Amendment when I called on him during my speech to recite it.

 

For your youthful ignorance, I forgive you. These are, after all, 21st century times and you are fat and superficially happy. All the comforts and conveniences have made you pudgy and lethargic and your self-esteem counterfeit. You don’t have the drive or discipline to make the effort to learn about the really GREAT sacrifices others have made just so you can be fat and superficially happy. Nobody’s teaching you. Poor babies. Different than the goal I stated I was there to achieve -- "My primary goal this evening is to mentor you, not be your friend" -- other adults have let you down and they may be foremostly to blame. Poor excuse, yes, but you will find a way to use it. I mean, how are you supposed to have any integrity, character or backbone - the morals and virtues our Founders told us we must have to 'keep the Republic' - if you’ve been influenced by adults who have none? Just being a member of the club was always enough for them to have an exaggerated perception about their own greatness, so why wouldn’t it work for you? Just join the club -- be great.

 

It’s funny how you could find the words to distance yourselves from the truths I was unafraid to tell, but could not find any words - not one - to tell about the indecent, moronic, and uncivil acts of those who were present who literally threaten the sanity and lawfulness of this world. Every single word you wrote and each silent implication you made said nothing less than that you were unoffended and OK with your opponents' exercise of their First Amendment rights, but offended by mine simply because I put them down bluntly and without politcal correctness. Like when the queer had to violently make the point over and over, screaming at the top of his lungs, that he wanted to be able to publicly tongue-kiss (just for starters) his boyfriend and not feel like the world was intolerantof it. Like when the liberal wanted to disrupt the whole event by ridiculously attempting to make his point that when he was born there was no responsibility on anybody’s part -- that his right to life came with no responsibility. (No wonder he’s continued that trainwreck of a thought throughout his life -- since his birth he’s bought into it!) Like when the guy wanted to make his point thatqueering was as legitimate as heterosexuality by asking me to concede that if I had my own penis cut off it would not mean that I was illegitimate (what the hell sort of argument is that, anyway?). Like when I asked who knew of a right that they could get, have or acquire that did not come with a responsibility and the dopey, red-eyed liberal kid said “Water.” Like when the other dopey, red-eyed liberal who sat all night long wallowing in her own piteous, bird-dropping thoughts until the subject of God came up and she just couldn’t control herself any longer and orgasmically screamed out: I DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD!! (And neither, honey, does He likely believe in the human catastrophe you’ve turned out to be.) Like all the childish screaming and angry, bigot-laden epithets hurled my way. Like all the anarchic, degenerate heckling in futile attempts to make me stop speaking the truth. Like all the subversive planning that was obviously done in an attempt to sabotage the event.

 

You seem to think (using the word loosely here) that there can be a debate with those who don’t use reason, rationality, and will not use, recognize and accept reality and truth. Neverminding in the first place, that I didn’t come in to debate, I came into declare. Lay down in bold, blunt terms what my Conservative beliefs are and where I will stand, without hesitation, stumble or waver, in presenting them or protecting them. Five minutes at my web presence reading a few paragraphs or reading through even my publicly-given Conservative speeches would have made that clear. I hide nothing from anybody, and certainly hid nothing from you. You simply fell for the tomfoolery of your own grotesquely-inflated, fake selves. What, like my principles would take a backseat to your College Republican club etiquette?

 

You likely won't get this little piece of plain talk, but the coarse, rowdy quality of speaking events, debate forums and the like today is a direct result of your RINO-in-kind's passive, capitulating and intellectually boring approach. You beget it. Not I or people like me. Every little whiny compromise along the way you gave into. Each time the radical, liberal crybabies screamed you stuck the pacifying teat in their mouth. They didn't grow up to accept the harsh realities of life: that you don't always get your way, and you won't always like the hand that life deals you. You and your kind figured it would just be easier to act the surrogate mommies and daddies, make nice, be pleasant, create dependency. Have a Coke and a frigging smile. All us uncouth, lesser folk have followed your polished, snobbish lead long enough. You’ve accomplished nothing more than ruining what principles truly are. Your haughty, blue-blood manners and customs have done nothing but contribute to the overall compromise of our country. Frankly, for all the fancy perfumes you use, you simply stunk up the place.

 

You seem to think (again, using the concept loosely here) that when others cease behaving like the rational animals they are and begin irrationally assaulting you that it is best to try and reason with them. That really works. Ask the guy who tried to do that with the chimpanzees last month. His wife told us that even while he was viciously attacked he tried to reason with the beasts that were having him for a snack. Maybe though it’s just that he made the mistake of bringing just one cupcake instead of three. Ask him where his face, foot and testicles are. That example too radical for you? The light bulb didn’t go on? You don’t get that a human being dismissing their rationality is no less than a monkey? Then why don’t you go read some of American History you claim to be so fond of to find out what the Founding People did when they were faced with the same rude and disrepectful irrationality and unreason? Don’t want to? Why? Because it will expose you for the weak, timid, gutless yellowbellies that you are? Why, because you’ll find out the truth of the matter, that you can be all prim, proper, phony and pontificating directly because stronger and grittier men and women before you have gotten down and dirty and bled for your freedom to be nothing but? Your silly, unserious lives can be what they are because there are some who, when punched, take it seriously - and throw harder punches back.

 

Yes, your youthful ignorance I can forgive. But your disrespect is something else. A something else I cannot passively tolerate.

 

Just who, Mike, were you referring to when you were quoting Thomas Jefferson: “the tree of liberty must be renewed by the blood of patriots”? When you were talking toughly about your activism, describing to me apparently where you drew your own line in the fight. Surely you weren’t referring to yourself and your own College Republican buddies, were you? Surely not, it seems now. It had to have been someone else with a real, blood-pumping heart nourishing real, patriotic guts. I wish I could have met him...and a few of his buddies.

 

And Emily Salisbury. Why the feigned innocence and proper and demure demeanor as if you hold so high and reverently true femininity and traditional Conservative principles? Why, when you so easily bed yourself with those who would savagely, in Genghis Khan fashion, laugh while “lying upon your lily white belly” raping you and the quality of your future family’s life? What is it about history you don’t quite understand Ms. Young College Republican? What is it exactly you don’t get about that today’s liberalism is simply a euphemism for all the other historically failed “isms’ -- Stalinism, Communism, Marxism, Socialism -- of the past? What is you know that you can enlighten me about on how to negotiate with tyranny and dictators and win? Please tell us. I'm not the only one who'd like to know. What is it you don’t get about that colonial women had bigger balls than today’s men and they fought like wild, ferociously-clawing tigers capitulating nothing to the murderers who raped them while their children were made to watch, just before they all died slow, humiliating deaths? Oh, that’s right -- you don’t know. No one told you those stories and you haven’t made the time to find out for yourself. But you are a member of the club. That’s what makes you great. Which rationalization will you choose to use, Emily, to explain your selling out so cheaply: back then there wasn’t political correctness and the uncomfortableness of dealing with it, or back then women didn’t have the same rights as I do today to have to contend with the greater responsibilities?

 

Either one is nothing less than prostitution: “To sell oneself for an unworthy purpose.”

 

Explain for me if you will, young College Republicans, how you square your applause and praise at the event, a 45 minute ride together back to the airport having a mature, engaging discussion, and further praise, handshakes, and appreciation for coming with an absolute denouncement of my appearance and the things I said? Not even reality TV is this well-crafted. Funny, I don't recall any of you telling me you were drama majors. Then again - recalling events correctly isn't what this is about.

 

Must have been that damn cold. But let me ask -- which do I believe, the hallucinations I must have had or the press releases? That damn cold must have effected my hearing, too. Because I didn’t hear any of you when you stepped forward with your convictions, candor, and College Republican bravery to tell me that you intended to do what you disrespectfully did. I know, I know. You’ll fall back on the worn out mischaracterizations -- you were afraid I would beat you up. Maybe you were speaking in silent codes like the liberal saboteurs, and I just didn’t catch the message.

 

Sure, the liberals were idiots, but you are craven cowards. You are young and not even full of youth’s natural piss and vinegar - only of your phony, superficial selves. Truth is, you stand for nothing, and resist absolutely none laying down to be violated and beaten by others.

 

I am a gracious man, though. And, also, I knew from the beginning that mentoring unexercised asses and young, soft minds would not be easy. So, let me offer you another chance. You claim to know Conservative values and ideas, then teach me. I offer you the challenge to debate -- with you College Republicans. I will return to your college campus at my own expense.

 

You choose your leader to face me and I will lead myself. We will see who knows Conservative ideals and values and traditions. Step away from your invertebrate shells and use your disagreements with me and let us work together to find out what brand of Conservatism young people want in these modern times: your piecemeal, milquetoast version or a Warrior one.

 

Warrior

[iliketurtles 0]

This guy is FUCKING NUTS.

 

I love how he doesn't even talk about the kid schooling him, which caused everything to start with.

 

That entire article is basically him caught up in his own bullshit.

 

Round 2, here we come.

[Guest netslob]

where can i pick up my $10,000? i deserve it, i just wasted 4 minutes of my life that i can never get back.

[Special K 0]

Finally a man that's brave enough to say that Conservatism is reall sacism, sexism, homophobia and a weird meandering philosophy about responsibility, and being proactive that you can't back up when challenged.

[Gary Floyd 0]

Hey folks, Warrior hates gay people

 

http://ultimatewarriorhatesqueers.ytmnd.com/

[Lil' Bitch 0]

I found the video of this infamous speech! LOL

[UZI Suicide 0]

You're the man bro.