Vern Gagne Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Pitching should dominate this series. Neither team is great offensively. Both do tend to have players step it up in big spots. Pitching sets up well for both teams.
Bored Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 A.J. Pierzynski vs. Roger Clemens. Finally we will know who is the bigger asshole. If you are sick of hearing "pitching wins championships" well this postseason is going to ensure we'll have to hear it for another 20 years based on how these two teams got here.
Precious Roy Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 I'm happy enough, I think I'll enjoy this series
The Czech Republic Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Someone's got it in for me.
therealworldschampion Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Clemens, Pettite, Contreras, El Duque......I think there's a good chance of Steinbrenner going nuts.
Precious Roy Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Well it serves him right, there was NO reason to let Pettitte go, just horrible, and he should have kept El Duque too. Clemens was out of his hands, and Contreras never assimilated to pitching for NY, he looks 100x more comfortable with the ChiSox.
the max Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 I always thought that pitching won championships. And based on the way that the White Sox dismantled the Red Sox in the ALDS, I'd say it's pretty true. The only reason I want the Astros to win it all is so that Bagwell and Biggio get their rings. I'm a softie for guys that stay loyal to a team.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Well it serves him right, there was NO reason to let Pettitte go, just horrible, and he should have kept El Duque too. Clemens was out of his hands, and Contreras never assimilated to pitching for NY, he looks 100x more comfortable with the ChiSox. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hernandez had a 5.12 ERA. He wasn't that good. And Pettitte did miss most of last year, and the Astros are on the hook for $17 million next season.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Frank Thomas needs to have an at bat in this series.
Precious Roy Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 (edited) Hernandez had a 5.12 ERA. That was from a small sample. He'd been a great postseason pitcher for us for years. *and you can't predict injurys like with Pettitte. He was healthy this year, wasn't he? And who wasn't? The big name signings, Wright and Pavano. Pettitte's postseason history was all the reason we needed to keep him. this shouldn't become a Yankee discussion though Edited October 20, 2005 by Precious Roy
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Hernandez had a 5.12 ERA. That was from a small sample. He'd been a great postseason pitcher for us for years. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Whitey Ford was a great postseason pitcher for you as well. Why not trot him out again?
snuffbox Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Frank Thomas needs to have an at bat in this series. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Is that possible?
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Pettitte's postseason history was all the reason we needed to keep him. Like game 6 of the 2001 World Series where he imploded? Or his horrific start against the Angels in 2002? Or his start in Atlanta in 1999 where he was knocked out in the 4th? Or against Cleveland in 1998 where he allowed 6 runs in less than five innings? How about 1997 when the Indians knocked out the Yankees in the first round, thanks to Pettitte losing two games and surrendering 11 runs?
Vern Gagne Posted October 20, 2005 Author Report Posted October 20, 2005 If you want to waste a roster spot.
Vern Gagne Posted October 20, 2005 Author Report Posted October 20, 2005 The Toy Cannon deserves a ring.
Precious Roy Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Hernandez had a 5.12 ERA. That was from a small sample. He'd been a great postseason pitcher for us for years. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Whitey Ford was a great postseason pitcher for you as well. Why not trot him out again? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Because he's a senior citizen. Last I checked El Duque's was pretty good when the Sox needed him this postseason
Precious Roy Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 And Al is the one who advocated signing Eric Milton this offseason, AND picked against the Astros TWICE already, like I give a shit what you think about the Yankees
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 And Al is the one who advocated signing Eric Milton this offseason, AND picked against the Astros TWICE already, like I give a shit what you think about the Yankees <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1. There's a difference for a lefty between pitching in Yankee Stadium and Great American Ballpark. 2. I advocated up to a certain price. I wouldn't have matched the Reds' offer.
Vern Gagne Posted October 20, 2005 Author Report Posted October 20, 2005 Someone's got it in for me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The dude in your avatar doesn't care about Czech Republic.
phoenixrising Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 OK, so I simmed the series using one of the best web sites of all time, whatifsports.com. I know, it's not a perfect simulation, but it's quick and dirty and I can get results now. Last year the sim predicted the Red Sox winning in six. Here's the 2005 World Series, according to whatifsports.com: Game 1: Houston 5, Chicago 2 Game 2: Chicago 4, Houston 3 Game 3: Chicago 7, Houston 1 Game 4: Houston 8, Chicago 7 Game 5: Chicago 4, Houston 2 (11 innings) Game 6: Chicago 3, Houston 2 (14 innings) So yeah, Chicago in 6. At least, according to one computer.
Styles Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Game 5: Chicago 4, Houston 2 (11 innings) Game 6: Chicago 3, Houston 2 (14 innings) This is gonna be a fun one.
bob_barron Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Pettitte's postseason history was all the reason we needed to keep him. Like game 6 of the 2001 World Series where he imploded? Or his horrific start against the Angels in 2002? Or his start in Atlanta in 1999 where he was knocked out in the 4th? Or against Cleveland in 1998 where he allowed 6 runs in less than five innings? How about 1997 when the Indians knocked out the Yankees in the first round, thanks to Pettitte losing two games and surrendering 11 runs? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You could turn that around and list all his good postseason starts though and his 2001 ALCS MVP. He has something 16-17 wins.
Vern Gagne Posted October 20, 2005 Author Report Posted October 20, 2005 I just simulated the series and it was Astros winning 4-3.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Pettitte's postseason history was all the reason we needed to keep him. Like game 6 of the 2001 World Series where he imploded? Or his horrific start against the Angels in 2002? Or his start in Atlanta in 1999 where he was knocked out in the 4th? Or against Cleveland in 1998 where he allowed 6 runs in less than five innings? How about 1997 when the Indians knocked out the Yankees in the first round, thanks to Pettitte losing two games and surrendering 11 runs? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You could turn that around and list all his good postseason starts though and his 2001 ALCS MVP. He has something 16-17 wins. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He's 14-9 with a 4.11 postseason ERA. And that's in an environment where less runs are scored. I never understood it. Pettitte is a good pitcher, but he's not some sort of postseason demi-god. He ranks tied for first in postseason wins all-time because he's first in postseason innings. EDIT: Pettitte's second in postseason innings. He'll top Smoltz again as soon as he makes it out of the first inning in the World Series.
bob_barron Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 Most people I know think Pettite sucks, just b/c of that Game 6 debacle v. the Dbacks.
mike546 Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 If I remember correctley, wasn't he supposedley tipping his pitches?
iggymcfly Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 I'm really torn on this series. I've always kind of liked the White Sox, I never liked the Astros, and I was really planning on cheering the ChiSox on this postseason. On the other hand, though, I love Roger Clemens, Oswalt's been crazy good in the postseason, and I kinda got into the Astros over the NLCS. I want to get into this World Series because it looks like it's going to be really good, and I know that the only way I'm really going to do it is to put a sizable wager on one of the teams. This is where it gets really tricky. Even though I'd kind of lean toward the White Sox based on allegiance, the fact that their favored in a series where I think the Astros should be even money at worst gives me pause. Finally, the Sox are favored in game 1, even though they have Contreras going against Clemens which is such a good line, I almost can't pass it up. It's going to really fuck up my allegiances if I bet the Astros to win Game 1 and the White Sox to win the series. Plus, I really like the idea of just getting a team ahead of time, and cheering for them from start to finish. What should I do?
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 20, 2005 Report Posted October 20, 2005 I'd bet on Clemens for Game 1 then White Sox to finish them off. The White Sox more likely than not will be a bit rusty in the first game or two.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now