geniusMoment Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 2 starts, 2 home runs for Hamilton. He also started the rally in the 7th with a double.
Guest Eagle Man Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 hey Czech, who do you want to buy your beloved Cubs after season's end? All I've heard thus far as a possible buyer is Mark Cuban. Well, Jerry Reinsdorf has some vendetta with Cuban, and I'm not clear why. I do know that he "warned the league" when Cuban bought the Mavericks, and was the lone vote against him. Reinsdorf is also the chairman of the ownership committee, is best buddies with Selig, and it's been hinted that he would convince other owners to vote Cuban down. There's so much illegal here. What a world, where Jerry Reinsdorf wields so much power among fellow owners. He's like five feet tall. Don Levin, who owns the AHL Wolves, would really love to buy the team. I'm not sure how he made his millions, though. (Not that it matters, nor am I insinuating some sort of illicit means, I'm just saying I don't have much info on the dude.) Jerry Colangelo is a local guy with a championship ring and has expressed interest, but he doesn't have any goddamned money because he blew it all on the fucking D-Bags. Bill Murray and Steve Stone want to buy the team, but not necessarily together, and I don't think they have the cash to make a deal, because we're talking about approaching a billion here. Cuban could be a great owner for the Cubs, since he could take that same high standard of statistical analysis he brought to the Mavericks and apply it to baseball, where it fits best. However, my prediction is that we end up with a consortium of Chicagoland millionaires and corporations, with Murray as a figurehead.
Fökai Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 So, I don't know if this is old news or not, but Johan has cut off negotiation talks with the Twins until he becomes a free agent at season's end. SI reports that it's not a matter of money, but the length of contract that the Twins were offering ( 2 years @ $18 mil each). Okay, Schuerholz, it may be wishful thinking, but do what you can. Think about who's going to be there in a season or two and beyond -- Hudson, James, Davies? The farm system isn't ready to produce talent that'll fill those holes in the rotation. Maybe Harrison in 2009, but that's likely it for now. They've already flirted with trading Andruw last season, so there's some financial flexibility right there. edit: Not that I'm condoning doing ANYTHING with Andruw that involves him leaving the team.
Failed Bridge Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Well, I just heard on WEEI that there's gonna be a four-way trade where the Red Sox get Ichiro, Rocco Baldelli, and Carl Crawford for Matt Clement and prospects. When I read this, my first reaction was that I was going to have to yell at Frigid Soul again. Its stuff like this that keeps us from being Myspace friends.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Santana isn't a free agent until after 2008.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 King Felix so far: 2-0, 0.00 ERA, 17 IP, 4 Hits, 4 BB, 18 Ks.
Boon Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 The Phillies have acquired Garciaparra. Wait- what? Was this a part of the WEEI joke?
Dobbs 3K Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Indians-Angels in Milwaukee last night drew about 19,000. So much for the predictions of only 3-4,000 people in attendance. Yes, the 10 buck tickets for field level surely helped a lot, but it just goes to show that Milwaukee is a good baseball town after all. And 16,000 tonight after people, not learning anything, thought sales would drop off into Marlins numbers after the first game. Yeah, pretty good numbers again, even with all the snow around the Milwaukee area. I'm sure people will find a way to complain when there's "only" 12,000 or so at today's day game, though. Nice for the Brewers to win two games last night, as well. Tied for first place! Wooo!
the pinjockey Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 The Phillies have acquired Garciaparra. Wait- what? Was this a part of the WEEI joke? http://thebaseballcube.com/players/G/Micha...rciaparra.shtml
Boon Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Garciaparra, Maddux, Giambi, DiMaggio. "The Phillies are like that guy who dates the cheerleader's ugly sister just b/c they have the same last name."
Guest Smues Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Not as bad as the Dodgers. http://www.dodgerblues.com/content/features_brother.html
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Garciaparra, Maddux, Giambi, DiMaggio. "The Phillies are like that guy who dates the cheerleader's ugly sister just b/c they have the same last name." Don't forget the Giant Killer, Harry Coveleski.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I just got done watchingt he Os game from last night..how many grand slams are they going to give up to win games this year..ugh..really great game though to go that long 0-0..ugh but still..Im convinced the Os offense is only good vs crappy pitching.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Not as bad as the Dodgers. http://www.dodgerblues.com/content/features_brother.html Two things I take from that article. 1. Todd or Tim Worrell? There's a fun debate. I take Todd. 2. Ken Brett had one of the most interesting careers of any under-the-radar player. Besides pitching, Brett slugged .406 as a pitcher.
Fökai Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Santana isn't a free agent until after 2008. Am I the only one who finds it weird that he's cut all off negotiations for the next eighteen months? My mistake on the contract.
Cheech Tremendous Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Santana isn't a free agent until after 2008. Am I the only one who finds it weird that he's cut all off negotiations for the next eighteen months? My mistake on the contract. I'll reiterate that if the Twins fall out of playoff contention this season, they should try to trade Santana. They have a 0% chance of resigning him if he goes to free agency. They don't have the $200 million+ that it is going to take to get him on a long-term dea. Teams would be willing to give up a hell of a lot of interesting stuff for a year and a half of Santana.
Guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I hope the Twins trade him for our glut of outfield prospects.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Tonight I'm going to catch Phil Hughes pitching for Scranton.
The Man in Blak Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 The remaining value on Santana's contract is an absolute steal for the Twins, so I can't see why they wouldn't want to wait as long as possible before dealing him off. I know that the Soriano non-deals from last year's deadline are still in recent memory, but Santana is a much more valued commodity than that and, as a result, I can't really see any scenario where the Twins would have difficulties dealing him next season.
Cheech Tremendous Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Tonight I'm going to catch Phil Hughes pitching for Scranton. You'll have to give us a scouting report. I hate the Yankees with all of my heart, and I'm even giddy about the guy's potential.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Tonight I'm going to catch Phil Hughes pitching for Scranton. You'll have to give us a scouting report. I hate the Yankees with all of my heart, and I'm even giddy about the guy's potential. I'll let you guys know, but I'm not sure I trust any performance in the weather we've experienced.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Fun stat from Jayson Stark. The Nationals have never batted with a lead at any point this season. (They got their only win in their last at-bat.)
razazteca Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I didn't know that the San Antonio Missions were affiliated with the Padres as their Double A team.
vivalaultra Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 This Sunday, on Jackie Robinson Day, there won't be only select representatives from each team wearing Robinson's #42. Five teams, the Dodgers, the Cardinals, the Pirates, the Phillies, and the 'Stros, are having their entire team wear special #42 jerseys. I think it's a fitting tribute, but, perhaps this is overkill a little bit. Since the Phils and the 'Stros are playing each other on Sunday, That'll be...what...like 60 guys wearing it for one game? The Dodgers, though, I can understand wearing the number as a team. Edit: Oh, and Mark Prior, after making progress in extended Spring Training, had to be shut down and sent to the doctor because of shoulder concerns. There goes his playing the 2007 Future's Game.
Guest Queen Leelee Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 I'm fine with it. But, let's please shut up about Jackie for a while after Sunday.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Why? If it wasn't for him, your avatar wouldn't be playing and you couldn't rave about "Alexander"'s sexiness.
Guest Eagle Man Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 This whole thing is pretty poorly executed. Just leave it to the Dodgers and the Mets. Having 25 guys wear 42 is going to look ridiculous, and it's really kind of a superficial way to honor breaking the color line, don't you think? It's just a 4 and a 2. I'm sure there are better ways to do this.
Slayer Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Frank Robinson Day is not the answer to everything
Guest Eagle Man Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 That's the day you stumble around asking which of those whippersnappers stole your fruit cup.
razazteca Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Frank Robinson Day is not the answer to everything All managers must wear his number?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now