The Niggardly King Posted January 4, 2008 Report Posted January 4, 2008 People sure do get excited about the smallest things. Personally, I'm more interested in seeing Santino's on-screen reaction. I hope he tries to break into the Playboy mansion Eddie Guerrero style.
Jingus Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. And yes, I'm fully aware that Playboy does indeed airbrush/photoshop/whatever the hell out of their pictures with a vengeance. To which I say, so what? It's the only place where you can get nudie pics of lots of the celebrities who get featured there. You're saying you'd literally rather have no nekkid Maria photos over some touched-up nekkid Maria photos?
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. And yes, I'm fully aware that Playboy does indeed airbrush/photoshop/whatever the hell out of their pictures with a vengeance. To which I say, so what? It's the only place where you can get nudie pics of lots of the celebrities who get featured there. You're saying you'd literally rather have no nekkid Maria photos over some touched-up nekkid Maria photos? Preachhhhhh
Lt. Al Giardello Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time.
foleyfanforever88 Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time. Ya, I'm sure that's it..if you aren't interested in seeing Maria naked there might be something wrong with you.
Lt. Al Giardello Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time. Ya, I'm sure that's it..if you aren't interested in seeing Maria naked there might be something wrong with you. I'll look at the pictures online, but I ain't going through the effort of buying the magazine. There's nothing wrong with me, sorry I ain't a no pussy getting computer nerd, who's obsessed with seeing a girl I'll never meet before in my life. I have more important things to worry about. I stopped reading nudie magazines as an adolescent, I've already gave my collection to my 14 year old cousin.
Jingus Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time. I've never paid money for any sort of porn in my life. Nice try. What does it matter if I've never met her? I have met Mickie James. Would my opinion somehow be more valid if it was her doing the spread instead of Maria? Also, you're disqualified for using the "pathetic aging virgin geek" cliche that so many wrestlers love to utilize whenever they go on their rants about smart marks. We need some sort of new version of Godwin's Law that states the first person to refer to a complete stranger as either being a virgin or living in their mother's basement has automatically lost the arguement.
Bruiser_Brody_ Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 This exact argument made DVD Message board ban hundreds of posters
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I can think of one that should be banned here. Personal attacks are not tolerated in the regular forum areas, EHME!
Lt. Al Giardello Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time. I've never paid money for any sort of porn in my life. Nice try. What does it matter if I've never met her? I have met Mickie James. Would my opinion somehow be more valid if it was her doing the spread instead of Maria? Also, you're disqualified for using the "pathetic aging virgin geek" cliche that so many wrestlers love to utilize whenever they go on their rants about smart marks. We need some sort of new version of Godwin's Law that states the first person to refer to a complete stranger as either being a virgin or living in their mother's basement has automatically lost the arguement. Either way, classifying anyone who isn't interested in seeing Maria in Playboy as a homosexual is just as ignorant as my "30 something year old virgin" comment. That's just plain fucking stupid. And also I don't even find Maria all that hot, there are pently of more good looking women on the WWE roster then Maria.
Canadian Brandon Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Maria in Playboy will be nice, but at the end of the day it's only a picture. We already see her half naked every week on Raw. No need for all the arguing.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 If we're choosing sides... I'd like to relay my support firmly in the "likes to look at boobies" camp.
2GOLD Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I'd preview the pictures first and see how much damage Playboy did before I buy it. Too much airbrushing doesn't make it worth a damn. But hell, I'll gladly take a naked Maria.
Jingus Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 This exact argument made DVD Message board ban hundreds of posters Really, what happened there? (I just started posting on DVD recently and it's... unique.) Either way, classifying anyone who isn't interested in seeing Maria in Playboy as a homosexual is just as ignorant as my "30 something year old virgin" comment. So is EHME/CB here the only one who didn't get the not-serious tone in my post? After all, it's statistically impossible for you ALL to be homos, so clearly I was joking to some extent. Meanwhile, he responded to my short quip with a long, detailed description of how I've never experienced the love of a woman. The two are not equitable. I don't even find Maria all that hot See, totally gay.
haVoc Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Some of you people disappoint me so much. "It's just completely naked pictures of Maria, who cares." You're all gay. No you're likely just some 30 something virgin who's never seen a naked female in REAL LIFE. And also has to resort to magazines like playboy to fulfill your sexual desire. I haven't bought a playboy magazine since Torrie Wilson in 2003, and I was in Gr. 10 at the time. I've never paid money for any sort of porn in my life. Nice try. What does it matter if I've never met her? I have met Mickie James. Would my opinion somehow be more valid if it was her doing the spread instead of Maria? Also, you're disqualified for using the "pathetic aging virgin geek" cliche that so many wrestlers love to utilize whenever they go on their rants about smart marks. We need some sort of new version of Godwin's Law that states the first person to refer to a complete stranger as either being a virgin or living in their mother's basement has automatically lost the arguement. Either way, classifying anyone who isn't interested in seeing Maria in Playboy as a homosexual is just as ignorant as my "30 something year old virgin" comment. That's just plain fucking stupid. And also I don't even find Maria all that hot, there are pently of more good looking women on the WWE roster then Maria. So when the pictures are posted online you won't look? Quit trying to act cool. I don't care if your single, a virgin, a male whore or married. All straight men wanna look at hot naked chicks. And don't try to say Maria isn't good looking. She sure as Hell isn't a dog.
luke-o Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 As much as I'd like to see Maria nude, it probably won't be all that good. I think Candice is hot, but her playboy spread was pointless, as was Torries and Ashleys.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 How was Torrie's useless? I know Candice was already in soft core porn and was on Playboy TV's Busted show for the 1st season and Ashley already had a spread in Playboy before. But I don't remember Torrie doing anything like that before the spread in Playboy.
Enigma Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Why is there even a discussion here on whether or not seeing Maria naked is a good thing? I smell a little bit of gay around here.
luke-o Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 How was Torrie's useless? I know Candice was already in soft core porn and was on Playboy TV's Busted show for the 1st season and Ashley already had a spread in Playboy before. But I don't remember Torrie doing anything like that before the spread in Playboy. I didn't say it was usless, I said it was pointless. Call me queer all you want, but I find Playboy spreads to be boring.
Thanks for the Fish Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I think the term "Playboy Spreads" is an oxymoron...
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 ... ... ... ... (shrugs shoulders) +1 ...I don't feel good about that. That's not helping...
Lt. Al Giardello Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I don't even find Maria all that hot See, totally gay. Kelly Kelly, Layla, Michelle McCool, Melina, Mickie James are all hotter then Maria.
Toxxic Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 This last page was awful. Thank God there's no such thing as HD Playboy magazines, or lives may have been lost through the vehemence.
Black Lushus Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 Why is there even a discussion here on whether or not seeing Maria naked is a good thing? I smell a little bit of gay around here. We want to see Maria naked, but Penthouse or Hustler would be better choices. Nothing gay about it, Playboy sucks.
Scroby Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I don't even find Maria all that hot See, totally gay. Kelly Kelly, Layla, Michelle McCool, Melina, Mickie James are all hotter then Maria. Those sir, are fighting words.
King Kamala Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 It don't mean shite if there ain't a dick goin in that pussy, son!
garfieldsnose Posted January 5, 2008 Report Posted January 5, 2008 I thought we were all gay since we post on a wrestling forum.
Recommended Posts