Jump to content

Stephen Joseph

Members
  • Posts

    1620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stephen Joseph

  1. and yeah, justcoz, that's pretty much what me and the source were chatting about. I've heard alot of stories through my friend about Hassan and Davairi, and they're good people who got screwed by Creative... and rather than say "Hey, we fucked up, we'll keep you on the payroll per our agreement, try to figure out something, but if we can't, at least you've got an income for awhile and we'll see if we can use you in corporate somewhere..." No, they couldn't even give him that.
  2. I'm called a cow I'm not about to blow it now for all the cows it's funny how money allows all to browse and be endowed the wish is true it falls into places new the cow is you my kind has all run out as if kinds could blend some time if time allows everything worn in like it's a friend I said you're all a painted doll and it caused the walls to fall how far is he? impatiently that's as far as could be
  3. Name: THE COW Height: 6'7 Weight: 1400lbs From: The Dairy Entrance Music: "For All The Cows" by Foo Fighters Manager/Owner: Farmer Jim THE COW comes to the ring wearing a Ric Flair-esque robe. Basic moves: Headbutt, shoulder charge, back kick, bite, lick, grass spit, GORE, milk squirt from udders to the eyes Finisher: THE TRAMPLE~! (jumps up and down upon opponent until either submits or can be pinned) Weaknesses: Prone to blows to the udders, and also being tipped will render THE COW unable to get back to its feet. Also has an inate fear of leather and meaty snacks. Bio: THE COW is a real flesh and blood cow who has been trained to wrestle by her owner, Farmer Jim, who noted her unusual abilities while trying to milk her. Contrary to earlier rumours, THE COW is in no way two guys in a suit.
  4. Yes, I'm fighting a cow. Don't worry, I'll find a way for Caboose to say "Don't have a cow man"
  5. See the new post about Hassan's character now, courtesy of moi
  6. I have a ton. Because WWE creative dropped the ball on his character, they turned it into a cheap heat gimmick. They brought him in when he was still green in the ring, but he can cut it on the mic. What I'm saying is that his career is fucked, and it speaks to the character of the WWE that they won't own up to their mistake and even attempt to make it right. The man just bought a home...
  7. If this is used for any so-called insider report, just credit TSM. Thanks "Hassan" left the PPV immediately after his match. He was told by WWE that he is their #1 priority and that they're going to do everything to repackage his character. However, it was a "don't call us, we'll call you" type of thing. At this moment, "Hassan" has no idea what's going to happen. He is currently spending time with his family. Also, Davairi has been told the same thing. EDIT: Before being banned from UPN tv, "Hassan" was scripted to win @ GAB. --TSM /Obviously, I won't reveal my source, but suffice it to say that he's close enough to "Hassan". I suggested this situation be combined with the Matt Hardy shoot angle to my source, who thought the idea might work and will filter it to "Hassan" Needless to say, its pretty shitty that the WWE won't take care of its own after they botched things up. You gotta have sympathy for em.
  8. Still no takers for a match with me? Cmon now!
  9. It's not interesting at all, unless you like nutjob consipracy theories this is fluff
  10. I'd love a title shot, but I have some very HEAVY competition at LTP that I'm going to have to MOOve out of my way
  11. Booking thread here. I started this thread because I have one very easy question. I would like to have a match with another writer. I really don't care much about the outcome, but I've got to get used to writing with other people again, especially since many of you are new. So will anyone join me in a match? Thanks -sj
  12. OMG WASHINGTON POST REPUBLICAN BIAS LOL2005!!! Credit: Washington Post You can follow the next two months of political thrashing and hullabaloo over the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court, or you can get the whole thing over with by looking at how he handled a single french fry. Thanks to a ninth-grader at Deal Junior High School who in 2000 committed the horrifying crime of eating a fry in the Tenleytown Metro station, we have as strong a look inside Roberts's mind as we're likely to get from weeks of investigation and hearings. Download audio transcripts of Marc Fisher's previous Talk Live call-in shows or subscribe to the XML podcast. Ansche Hedgepeth was only 12 when a Metro police officer caught her, fry in hand, as she waited for her Red Line train. Under the system's zero-tolerance, no-eating policy, the cop arrested Ansche, cuffed her and took her in. An adult in that situation would have gotten a citation, but District law said minors were to be taken into custody until retrieved by a parent. The french fry case hit John Whitehead's buttons. A Charlottesville lawyer whose Rutherford Institute fights for civil liberties from a conservative perspective, Whitehead took on Ansche's case, arguing that the government had gone too far. The matter wound up in the U.S. Court of Appeals, and Roberts's decision last fall shows him to be a witty writer with the confidence to show some heart. He seems pleased that after "the sort of publicity reserved for adults who make young girls cry," Metro changed its policy and no longer arrests young snackers. Roberts recognizes that Ansche wants the charges nullified because no one wants to have to say yes to that standard application question, "Ever been arrested?" But Roberts quickly divorces himself from the human side of the case. He has no sympathy for the notion that Ansche was discriminated against because of her age. Roberts says government has every right to treat children differently, setting age requirements for voting, marriage, driving and drinking. Anyway, he notes, the fact that Metro changed its policy so quickly shows "that the interests of children are not lightly ignored by the political process." But Roberts rejects the idea that the court should weigh in on whether the police trampled on Ansche's freedom. President Bush has always said he likes judges who take a limited view of their role, who stick to the facts without imposing their political interpretations. But that's all political rhetoric: Every case requires every judge to interpret the law. The question is what philosophy guides them. At every turn in the french fry case, Roberts defers to authority. He says Metro's policy of arresting kids "promotes parental awareness and involvement" by requiring parents to pick up their misbehaving child. Roberts may personally doubt Metro's arrest policy -- "it is far from clear that [the arrest is] worth the youthful trauma and tears" -- but he concludes "it is not our place to second-guess such legislative judgments." There's the Roberts philosophy. He repeats it throughout the opinion: It's not the court's role to tell police whether an arrest is reasonable if the officer has probable cause. It's not the court's place to consider Ansche's constitutional rights if Metro has already changed its rules. As Whitehead told me yesterday: "He's exactly what I would expect George Bush to choose. He's very deferential to authority, whether government or business. He's not a civil libertarian. He is a thinking judge and he sees Ansche's pain. But he's like the father that comes to whip you and says, 'This hurts me more than it hurts you.' He just doesn't see that the letter of the law only works when it applies to human beings." The french fry case tells the story of someone much like the president -- a man who embraces the rhetoric of limited government but defers to and protects government authority. Roberts will disappoint both ends of the spectrum. He's neither an Antonin Scalia nor a William Douglas, justices whose personal passions bled through their judicial opinions, making them polarizing but creative and influential. The reporting on Roberts describes him as a conservative Republican, but a single french fry reveals more about who he is on the bench: a judge who sees it as his task to separate the mess and emotions of daily life from the letter of the law.
  13. Well, I claimed the falcons over at the PIT, so I damn sure hope I don't have to reclaim them... cmon kkk...
  14. Derrick Lee 3 home runs in 3 games Damn I love this guy
  15. you mean eminent domain, because that was the 4 liberal justice and stevens mucking it up...scalia was against it. and i think we all agreed that kelo was bullshit, so scalia would be on the right side
  16. For pete's sake there's alot of uneccessary posting and bickering here. Getting back on the subject, it appears today (from a dc persepective) that we're going to enjoy a long confirmation, but no filibuster. Most everyone is pretty much saying this guy was as close to a non-controversial pick as you could get. guess the confirmation hearings will be fun...webcasts! /aside...stupid pro-choice protestors making most pro-choicers look crazy...we don't even know where he stands yet, please dont have rash protests, he wrote that opinion for a client, which is different from his opinion, and his only stated opinion was that its just law (meaning Roe) now, and he upholds just law... yawns
  17. Former Clinton admins are saying its a good choice hell, everyone in DC seems to be saying (hmm, good choice, weird)
  18. SJ Hey Puerto. Can I borrow your belt? TPR Sure Popick. Why? SJ Because someone can't dance worth shit. ::Beltshots Zack:: SJ Whew. Saved by the BELT!
  19. Firstly, I really want to commend JOTW for being the only THINKING liberal in the CE folder. There rest of you...wow. Roberts is about as moderate of a choice as Bush is going to throw out. Why? Because he WON this right. I said the same thing about Clinton. When you win, you get to dictate the agenda and players. Roberts is going to be very difficult for the Dems to filibuster. Do you know how badly a filibuster is viewed (its the equivalent of blowing your load politically). /Aside JOTW, its actually opposite. Most Americans are actually more identified with conservative values than liberal (no change vs. change). However, the country is still evenly split with about 1/3 strongly democrat and the othe 1/3 strongly republican. Had the US been so strongly liberal, Kerry would have won. It's quite the opposite.
  20. I would hope it would start out with the plane crash again...but the camera is in the tail section...black it out as soon as the tail rips away...
  21. My Promo is done.
  22. Only highlight this one if you REALLY want to know
×
×
  • Create New...