Black Lushus

poor Booker, he just doesn't seem to have the best showings at Royal Rumbles. He gets a couple eliminations but he just doesn't last worth a shit...with his injury, that won't change.

What'd you want? Motive behind their actions? An epilogue? To me, Elephant works because it's a non-biased look at what is (until the shootings) just another, uninteresting day. People walk the halls, bump into friends, have lunch, and talk about trivial things that don't have the same wit we've become used to because of people like Kevin Smith. The motives behind the Columbine incident and countless others like it has been done to death (no pun intended). We've heard all of the alleged experts present theories on what caused it, but in most cases, the real answer is never known. What Van Sant does here is present the scenario and leave the viewer to fill in the pieces. Why should he or anyone else tell you what the motives were, when his guess is probably as good as the person's watching it? Bruiser, brother, relax, I just wanted to see an actual ending! Motive I get, though I found it odd that dark haired gunner capped blonde haired gunner...

TRAVIS BRICKLY REALLY IS DEAD???

HHH is not currently Raw's top star and hasn't been so for 3 quarters of a year now...sure someday he'll be there again, but he currently is not. and I've gone on record numerous times with my dislike of RVD, but he's hardly the worst wrestler they have, not as long as Chris Masters still appears.

I was just gonna say something about this as well as I started reading Drew's post...for nostalgia reasons alone, they should include it SOMEWHERE...I mean it's not like it's gonna hog a lot of disc space...just throw it on somewhere.

LOL Rip, my "Kobe has the numbers line" was refutting YOU mentioning freaking Robert Horry and Will Perdue! We're talking about Kobe and LeBron, not muthafuckin Will Per fuckin due! I've said from jump, when LeBron wins a couple titles, we'll talk. THE END.

that's your counter in the arguement? comparing lower tier/support type guys when people are comparing top level stars? okay, if you want to talk numbers, which ringless guys like Malone and Iverson have, let's talk numbers...Kobe has titles AND numbers. Kobe doesn't just have titles...he has the numbers too...I don't think I can make that any clearer. So, you're telling me, two guys who are in the upper echalon of the NBA and say they both play the exact same number of years when it's all said and done, yet LeBron comes up with no titles, he's still going to have the better career...ooooookay...you honestly think Iverson will have the better career overall than Kobe? Vince Carter is the king of overrated, Rip, I can't believe you went there with that shit.

909 hit it on the head, I can't say it any better...when LeBron gets all those accolades, regardless or whether Kobe had Shaq or not, then we can talk. We're talking career, not better player, and I still think even that is highly highly debatable.

I noticed on mine, at the beginning of the month, Taboo Tuesday as well as whatever that PPV was where Eddie faced Batista, both PPVs were listed as being 1 minute in length...sure enough, they were both just 1 minute in length...now the Eddie/Batista PPV isn't there anymore but Taboo Tuesday is and now it sawys 162 minutes in length...I haven't checked to see if it's the real deal or not, however.

someone else's opinion is affecting you that badly? Better start setting that VCR/DVR!

I hated the ending...hated hated hated it...oh yeah and the non-stop walking...ugh!

I didn't want to blow a load of cash on Angle and figured I'd go for some slighly lower end guys like Lashley, Rey and Orton, simply based on the Rumble itself...I'm riding on Lashley getting a ton of eliminations and either Rey or Orton winning it...I may have screwed myself with picking Henry because he'll probably lose by DQ and set up a rematch at No Way Out or some shit.

that wouldn't make sense on PPV days.

be honored that your old posting friend is the first to comment on your blog! Of course, I don't really have an actual "comment", but it's cool.

you have an insider in the tennis world that you dangle from the balls by?

hard to beat people in the assist category when you have to carry a whole team by yourself.

how'd everyone do last night? On the Raw side I had Shelton, Carlito, Lita and Masters, so it was shitty and I suck at this, but hey, it's my first time! I should hopefully have a strong showing on Smackdown and the Rumble (with my Smackdown guys).

well, i think it's unreasonable to expect them to put out an ALL AROUND good product, but there's definently been plenty of times when the good far outweighed the bad. I just don't think right now, except for most of Smackdown, you can really say that.

I'm going to miss the JR/Tazz combo...that was a damn good one.

does Michelle Tafoya still work the ABC sidelines? I like her in a MILF kinda way.

I don't agree with that statement, it can go either way...Shaq needed Kobe, too, ya know...Shaq couldn't do it alone in Orlando and he hasn't gotten it done in Miami WITH Dwayne Wade. Even this year, they're not the favored ones to win the title, Detroit and San Antonio still stand above them.

if AI ever wants to win a title he's gotta get the fuck outta Philly.

are we talking in numbers here or opinions?

LeBron's gotta win some titles before I put him over Kobe.

the WWE does swing in and out from being good to not being good...consistency is the problem, so dealing with the crap and "waiting for it to get better" is actually a viable option. I agree, people should shit or get off the pot...if you're going to bitch about the product sucking, tell us why, don't just say "i'm done watching". If you're done, then be done, but I certainly think people have the right to complain about what sucks with the product, a product they've been dealing with for years, through good and bad.