RavishingRickRudo

How the hell is Matts column "balanced"?

Just because a guy over-shadowed the other and the aftermath of the match shifted to another feud thus making the win meaningless doesn't mean that Benoit didn't beat Michaels.

No. Unless you think throwing a typewritter at someone elses head is romantic. Then yes, yes it is a Romanic Comedy.

I really don't know what to say besides I have never laughed that hard in the theatre. Now, where's my jazz flute?

Horny?

Your avatar. Her breasts. The "T" in TNA. You "watching" TNA. I'm back, baby~!

A good song for an Angel vid? "Cherish" by Madonna. "Cherish the strength; you got the power to make me feel good (Oh baby) Perish the thought, of leavin, I never would" I am so ashamed of this...

Clearly (He's BACK~!)

Matt isn't "told to" say this, and this isn't a WWE.com writer posing as Hardy; this is what 99% of all wrestlers think. Wrestlers, inherently, look down on the fans -the marks- so whenever the fans look down on them all-of-a-sudden it's because there is something wrong with us. Yes, it is OUR FAULT that they're running what is essentially a RAPE ANGLE where we are to believe that Kane forced Lita to have sex and now she is pregnant. Shouldn't the law be involved in this? I mean, its being portrayed on Television and a woman was threatened into sex, so shouldn't this be looked into by the cops? This is insulting to our intelligence, but apparently we can't say that because we don't know anything about the business and we don't run our own promotions. How dare we -the fans- comment on such things? The outrage! We are totally ungrateful for the sacrifices they make. All we do is give them our time and our money and our attention; we don't deserve to say our opinion - well, unless its either sugar-coated or complementary. "Don't think like that... think like this!" is what Hardy is saying, and it's disgusting. It's OUR FAULT for being negative. It's not the constant insults hurled at us both on television in the form of plot holes and degrading storylines, and on-line in Hardy, Bradshaw, Prichard etc. reminding us how small we are - why should we be negative because of that? It's because of those evil Internet Writers whom we blindly follow and our own closed-minded, "one-dimensional" nature (but Hardy is not insulting us... oh no. He's being polite.) Fuck Matt Hardy. Fuck the WWE. Until they stop making this "The WWE vs. The Internet", until they stop seeing us as adversaries, and until they see where WE are coming from in regards to their OWN shitty programming, then there will always be crap like this. And you know what? It will NEVER stop. And it's not because we are negative; it's because they see us as marks and therefore we are to be "worked", and if they're not working us -if we aren't buying their shit- then it's because we're jaded and bitter and cynical and not because they can't get us to believe in the work. Because they think they are holding up their end of the bargain. They think they are putting out the "quality" feuds, matches, and storylines - and if you had insanely low standards and saw the fans as idiots, then I guess it would be "quality". They will never see it's their fault, because the only people being worked is them.

Benoit retains because this is the least "high-profile" title match since... Bad Blood... so the focus is off "Benoit beating HHH"/"HHH losing" and on "Eugene doing whothefuckcares"/"Oh hey, lookoverthere!" so Benoit doesn't actually benefit from beating HHH and HHH doesn't lose anything in the process. Thus, HHH continues to dominate the show while Benoit continues to be a lame duck champion who no-matter-how-long-he-has-the-belt will always be holding it for the real champ.

No, the "spot the errors in our website" is just to cover for fuck ups where people will think its intentional when really they're incompetent. ...And I could shit out a better Bio.

I lost like 87% of the brilliance I once dominated this thread with. Now I just wander around throwing in pointless one-liners to justify my existance and/or fulfill some sort of self-importance quota. I feel like a fucking Hardcore Discussion reg. OHMGUH~! Let's go back in time... This Classic Rudo moment has been brought to you by... Classic Rudo Moments: Yes, you did just read that.

Alright... Seasons 1,2,3,4,5,6 of Buffy are out, and I believe 1,2,3 of Angel as well. Which disc(s) should I rent? I love commentaries, so pimp away.

I'd like to know who these "Internet Writers" are. Is he talking about Meltzer (who he probably subscribes to)? Keller? Keith? (?) We're writing on the internet, is he talking about us??? Hows abouts you have the balls to actually point out who you're criticizing Mattyboy, rather than hiding behind a generalization.

This got a smirk outta me.

http://spotlight.wwe.com/ He is the master of the Crossface Crippler...

So if Matt says that we shouldn't take opinion as fact.. ... is that an opinion or a fact?

I think they published this article before... twice before, actually. They couldn't even write an original column for the guy(s).

It doesn't help that the wrestlers have a superiority complex over the fans marks that watch them perform.

There, fixed it up fer ya.

So how come one is permitted and the other isn't? So much for this "protection".

Oh, and if My Daddy ran a wrestling promotion, I'd probably take Matt up on his offer. What a fucking maroon. I lost any respect I had for him with this generalizing piece of shit. Matt can't even take his own advice and see things from all views; because if he put himself in the shoes of WWE fans, he'd see what we have to put up with - like WWE.com and its affiliates completely talking down to their internet audience and insulting us at every single chance they get forever reminding us that we know nothing and they know everything. Fuck em. This shit makes me sick.

My biggest gripe is the negativity the Internet is breeding due to people being desensitized and one-dimensional when it comes to our product. That's what happens when you provide a product without feeling and depth you fucking dumas.

To run for President, a person has to meet certain criteria, which were setup for the protection of this nation and its people. To loosen those criteria would be dangerous and potentially very stupid. *Big Laugh* I think "Not born in America" is less dangerous than, say, "has ties with big corporations which can create conflicts of interest" (and this is in general, not just related to Bush - it applies to Clinton as well).

Pull guard.