Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest hhheld_down

The OAO WWE RAW Thread 11-03-03

Recommended Posts

Guest Kamui
So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked?

Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent

Batista and Orton are the future of the WWE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent

Goldberg vs. Batista

 

thats off the charts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked?

Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

oh boy... so then can he just say that any time from here on out would be technically "after" the match, and he could kick the crap out of him?

 

Thats lame... rules should only be enforced bell to bell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked?

Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

 

You know most of us don't give a shit about nor we do care to remember most of RAW's backstage segments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only Austin would have drinking shoes.

 

Austin probably has a drinking toe too.

 

"Steve, you've really had too much to drink."

 

"Hol' on..

 

Yep, yep. Toe's still there, get me the damn beer."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked?

Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule??

Thank you. There's no point in even having the SS match now. Austin controls the rules that governs him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest hhheld_down

i will give goldberg a little credit for limpin a little bit but still

 

oh well, theres always next week's exciting episode..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kamui
So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked?

Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad?

 

Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation."

 

-I'm not here

Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule??

I didn't say it was logical, made sense, or a good thing. I just said, storyline-wise, he was allowed to do it.

 

-I'm not here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
when is Henry going to do that SSP that we've heard so much about from his indy days?

I never heard about that. Are you sure you're not thinking of Brock?

quick on the draw there...

 

woosh.

 

 

Now all we have to do is wait for Goldberg to do the Van Terminator...

Um...I believe you are confused with TBS...

 

It's a legend that in his early wcw days, He was capable of hitting a SSP.

Moonsault, not SSP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×