Cherry Blossom Viscount Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 ACTUALLY, the angle with Batista not giving a damn about Austin is carried over from the last show where he was going to go toe to toe with Austin when the Artic Twins showed up and beat up Evolution.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Maybe Berg wont drink the beer and then Austin will stunner him..
Guest Kamui Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked? Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here
dubq Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 They didn't when he stunned Stacy, why should this be any different? *sigh* God I hope Austin's team loses that match...
Drury37 Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 I just got a call from 1998 and he said he just wet his pants over this moment. Thanks.
Astro7x Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 2 more minute of overrun beer drinking fun :\
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Batista and Orton are the future of the WWE.
The Mandarin Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Goldberg drinks it and spits it out and makes an "eeewww" face.
Steviekick Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 At least Gberg has been selling the leg injury well. He even sold it during his little jumpy thing taunt.
Ted the Poster Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Now GOLDBERG is channeling HHH...
Jobber of the Week Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 All this heavy breathing.. Just from that? HUFF.... PUFF.....
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Goldberg vs. Batista thats off the charts.
Astro7x Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked? Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here oh boy... so then can he just say that any time from here on out would be technically "after" the match, and he could kick the crap out of him? Thats lame... rules should only be enforced bell to bell
LaParkaYourCar Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked? Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule??
dubq Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 King is having a "puppies" orgasm over this match making bit...
Cherry Blossom Viscount Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Austin on top again. You know, why can't Eric ever stop Austin from abusing his power, seeing as how many times Austin has foiled Bischoff. Oh well.
Guest Choken One Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 way to give goldberg his own seperate identity
Lil' Bitch Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here You know most of us don't give a shit about nor we do care to remember most of RAW's backstage segments.
LaParkaYourCar Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Batista and Orton are the future of the WWE. Then count me out.
The Mandarin Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Only Austin would have drinking shoes. Austin probably has a drinking toe too. "Steve, you've really had too much to drink." "Hol' on.. Yep, yep. Toe's still there, get me the damn beer."
Cherry Blossom Viscount Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked? Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule?? Thank you. There's no point in even having the SS match now. Austin controls the rules that governs him.
Guest hhheld_down Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 i will give goldberg a little credit for limpin a little bit but still oh well, theres always next week's exciting episode..
Guest Kamui Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So we ignore the fact that Austin wasn't provoked? Are the listening skills of smarks really getting this bad? Austin said earlier (paraphrased)- "I'm going to be the special guest enforcer, which means anyone coming down to the ring before, during, or after the match I'll consider committing an act of physical provocation." -I'm not here Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize Austin could just change the rule like that...so why didn't he do that before? If Austin just had to say "that's physical provacation" then why is he even worried about getting rid of the rule?? I didn't say it was logical, made sense, or a good thing. I just said, storyline-wise, he was allowed to do it. -I'm not here
Guest The Old Me Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 Orton is one of the best on the roster today. Batista is a monster.
Spaceman Spiff Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 when is Henry going to do that SSP that we've heard so much about from his indy days? I never heard about that. Are you sure you're not thinking of Brock? quick on the draw there... woosh. Now all we have to do is wait for Goldberg to do the Van Terminator... Um...I believe you are confused with TBS... It's a legend that in his early wcw days, He was capable of hitting a SSP. Moonsault, not SSP.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 4, 2003 Report Posted November 4, 2003 So whose better? Orton or Batista? Be honest now.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now