MrRant Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 In this field office in Washington, 32 prosecutors, investigators and a handful of FBI agents are spending millions of dollars to bring anti-obscenity cases to courthouses across the country for the first time in 10 years. Nothing is off limits, they warn, even soft-core cable programs such as HBO's long-running Real Sex or the adult movies widely offered in rooms of major hotel chains http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationwor...-home-headlines Isn't there other things that Ashcroft can do outside of worrying what people are jacking it too?
The Amazing Rando Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 bwahahahaha.... maybe they are worried about Porn Bombs.
Rob E Dangerously Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 and I thought terrorists were the real threat.. silly me
Ravenbomb Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 I thought the softcore stuff on HBO was only on late at night
Mole Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 Wow, wow, wow, this is so stupid. There are SO many problems in this world and we have the gov't worrying about FUCKIN PORN.
MrRant Posted April 6, 2004 Author Report Posted April 6, 2004 I thought the softcore stuff on HBO was only on late at night It is. Unless you get say the East Coast feeds and live on the West Coast and it starts at 7PM.
Jobber of the Week Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 Gee, where's Bill "HBO porn is okay because you pay for it but this MTV stuff is unacceptable" O'Reilly now to defend HBO now? Oh, wait. I forgot.
Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0 Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 UGH. The Planet Of the Apes Extra's boobshot strikes again. Fuck her, fuck MTV, fuck this 'back to morals' bullshit. We do NOT need to be sent back several years in time for this, especially not on (what should be) such an insignificant event.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 Who gives a fuck about what people whack to. It's my right as an American to jerk off to others having sex. [/Patriotic mode]
2GOLD Posted April 6, 2004 Report Posted April 6, 2004 Prepare gentleman Prepare for ladies in full length dresses on the beach. Get ready to start preparing to dim your lights so you can jerk off to an ankle a woman shows in an 8x10.
razazteca Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 That's it I will now spend 14 hours a day downloading porn now.
Kapoutman Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 hahaha. God Bless Canada. Indeed. *Puts hand on heart and sings "O Canada"*
Slayer Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 If it's anything like the war on terror, the perverts are safe
Highland Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 (edited) "The State has no business in the bedrooms of the nation." Too bad that doesn't apply to the United States. Edited April 7, 2004 by Naibus
Rob E Dangerously Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 One of the good reasons to vote for Kerry: President Kerry = Attorney General Ashcroft (preceding picture was not intended to threaten Mr. Ashcroft. Don't break down my doors, mmk?)
Guest Evolution Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 "Sexual activity does not cause prostate cancer, and men who ejaculate frequently may even be protecting themselves against the disease, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday." Well, men. We're all fucked.
Slayer Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Well, at least we'll still have our imaginations Unless the gov't wants to take that away too (no impure thoughts, SINNERS~!)
LaParkaMarka Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Ok. Isn't there a big thing in the States about unemployment? Isn't the porn industry one of the only industries that is booming in the US? Harrassing the porn industry is only going to cause even more jobs to leave the US. If there's one thing that shouldn't be outsourced, it's pornography.
bobobrazil1984 Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Fucking religious right. These are the kind of push-their-morality-on-you people who are in bed with George Bush. (Kerry should start using this "vote for Bush, and you will lose your porn!" He'd win in a landslide!) Ashcroft, a religious man who does not drink alcohol or caffeine, smoke, gamble or dance, and has fought unrelenting criticism that he has trod roughshod on civil liberties in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, is taking on the porn industry at a time when many experts say Americans are wary about government intrusion into their lives. The Bush administration is eager to shore up its conservative base with this issue. Ashcroft held private meetings with conservative groups a year and a half ago to assure them that anti-porn efforts are a priority. read that first line. He's deciding what we can and cannot watch, and what is obscene. THE GUY PROBABLY THINKS showing someone downing a beer to unwind is "obscene"
Slayer Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Ashcroft, a religious man who does not drink alcohol or caffeine, smoke, gamble or dance "Great. The world's most boring human." What did Missouri see in this guy anyway?
Guest El Satanico Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Why do these people care about legal things people do in their own homes. If we hadn't already witnessed wars waged by this administration, I may have been concerned.
Guest El Satanico Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Ashcroft, a religious man who does not drink alcohol or caffeine, smoke, gamble or dance What did Missouri see in this guy anyway? I don't think Missouri thought much of him...Didn't they elect a dead person over him?
Highland Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 What did Missouri see in this guy anyway? They don't see anything in him; he lost to a dead man.
bobobrazil1984 Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 What's next for Ashcroft? Levying fines against shows that depict people playing poker? Dancing?
Slayer Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 I don't think Missouri thought much of him...Didn't they elect a dead person over him? They don't see anything in him; he lost to a dead man. Yes, but he still was elected twice for gov ('84 and '88) and then elected to one term as senator before losing to said dead guy
Styles Posted April 7, 2004 Report Posted April 7, 2004 Ridiculous. I'm not condemning the whole adminsitration (especially for their actions on the war on terror which I do support) but this is just a waste of resources. I think it's time Bush kicked Ashcroft to the curb. Perhaps a restructuring is needed. And Cheney and Rice should switch places. Let Cheney work in the background as an advisor which is what he is anyway, and let Condi come to a more high profile position which would make history in 2 ways, and gain Bush more support on his ticket. Don't know if it will happen though. Oh and thanks Janet for starting this whole thing, hope you get a few more record sales out of it. Bitch.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now