Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted July 14, 2004 So basically you're making excuses for not backing up why Flair drags these matches down or why they don't compare to anything Bret did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Bret may have wrestled Diesel, but Diesel was no El. Oh yeah? Could El work so hard that he tore a quad just seconds after getting into the ring? Sure, Nash is a little gimpy now but it's only because he pushes his body to the limits instead of being lazy like El. They lost so much potential money by not doing that Nash vs El Gigante feud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Ok, there's a Bret/Steamboat match from 1986 that's available on video. Find it and watch it. Then, find a Flair/Steamboat match, take your pick. Then compare the two. If you want to find other common opponents, there's always Sting, Luger, Hall, Michaels, Austin, Benoit, Misawa, Funk, Vader, Savage, Waltman, Jarrett, Lawler and Hennig, among many others I'm sure. I am getting a bit annoyed here. What i am saying is all these matches where not that great. Certainly not becuase of Flair. I enjoyed the Steamboat Flair fued, but that was before i saw loads of Flair matches. I dont think i would enjoy rewatching them. I am sure you believe those are 5 star matches in your mind, but i dobut most od them will reach 3 stars. well, then lets see your list of 5 star matches.....if you don't wanna do that....then stop your arguing NOW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBigSwigg 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Ok name me one great match on the Ric Flair DVD that doesnt have Steamboat Or Windham on it? How about the cage match with Harley Race? I, for one, think that it is one of the best cage matches I've ever seen. Don't get me wrong, I'm not Super Flair Mark 19904, but I do think that his early work is some of the best I've seen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest brethart Report post Posted July 14, 2004 So basically you're making excuses for not backing up why Flair drags these matches down or why they don't compare to anything Bret did. Are you a idiot? I've just explaned what Flair does in every single match countless times. Ok one last time. Flair kills all the drama in his matches, by doing stupid comedy spots. Flip floping over the top rope. Not selling punches properly by floping on his face. His selling in general is awfull. He takes a body slam every match. He gets thrown off the top turn buckle every match. His finisher is really weak, and rarely wins matches. He got himself more over than the babyfaces by being funny. There i made my points so either reply to them, or shut up. Dont clam i am not backing my clams up ok? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Flair kills all the drama in his matches, by doing stupid comedy spots. Flip floping over the top rope. Not selling punches properly by floping on his face. His selling in general is awfull. He takes a body slam every match. He gets thrown off the top turn buckle every match. His finisher is really weak, and rarely wins matches. He got himself more over than the babyfaces by being funny. Examples? Back it up with tidbits from matches... you sound like you're throwing shit against the wall right now. You're not saying what spots were comedy aside from 2, one of which mainly involved Flair running to the other turnbuckle to try and take the opponent by surprise. Why is it comedy? Why was his finisher weak? Give examples of him getting himself more over than the face. How is any of the spots he did every match different than the spots Bret did any match? Come on stop kicking and screaming here please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest brethart Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Sorry Ric Flair is famous for these spots. I am not debating with you no more your clearly a idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted July 14, 2004 How is it different that Hart's legsweep, stomp to the mid-section, DDT, middle rope elbow drop every match? He was just as guilty of overusing spots as Flair was. Greg Valetine used the flop after the punches too. I'm probably sure several heels have done it before as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBigSwigg 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Sorry Ric Flair is famous for these spots. I am not debating with you no more your clearly a idiot This is quite possibly the greatest argument in the history of TSM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Are you a idiot? I've just explaned what Flair does in every single match countless times. Ok one last time. Flair kills all the drama in his matches, by doing stupid comedy spots. Flip floping over the top rope. Not selling punches properly by floping on his face. His selling in general is awfull. He takes a body slam every match. He gets thrown off the top turn buckle every match. His finisher is really weak, and rarely wins matches. He got himself more over than the babyfaces by being funny. There i made my points so either reply to them, or shut up. Dont clam i am not backing my clams up ok? First off, quit flaming people. Flair got himself over by being DIFFERENT. He was over for being such a cocky prick, aka people wanted to see him get his ass kicked. Start using valid points, or don't make any at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Good first paragraph. Should be followed, with ... "For example, in Flair v Steamboat at Clash VI, around the 15-minute mark ..." and go from there. You're throwing these things out there without naming specific matches where anything of the sort happened and I want specific examples. It's only at that point that this discussion will get anywhere. As for those other matches, I never said any of them would be *****. You're missing the point. I'm saying that if you want to compare Flair and Bret as workers, pick any common opponent they've had and compare the two matches and say which one was better and why. It's worth noting that Bret has had better matches with many of those wrestlers than Flair ever did, so making your case should be as easy as you want it to be. I'm a fan of both wrestlers. I know who I think was better, and the answer would probably surprise you quite honestly. But I want to know where you've seen Flair do all of the things you've accused him of ... specifically. It's your point to make whenever you're ready. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jester 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 They lost so much potential money by not doing that Nash vs El Gigante feud. That needs to be a Triple Threat match with Mabel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BHK 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Sorry Ric Flair is famous for these spots. I am not debating with you no more your clearly a idiot. The first 6 or so pages of this thread were actually some interesting discussion. Then that person showed up. Posts along the lines of "Flair sucks bret rules" aren't really doing anything for the thread, so either back it up or please stop. I like both Flair and Hart. I happen to like Hart more becasue I grew up on 90's WWF. I've seen 80s wrestling, NWA and WWF. I'm not bashing it at all. The Flair/Steambot seires is an awesome series of matches. Survivor Series '96 and Wrestlemania 13 just do more for me. I just find it kind of sad that two great wrestlers have to tear into each other like this. A lot of the people that have posted in the thread are either diehard Flair or Hart fans. There's nothing wrong with enjoying both of them, they're both grat wrestlers. one just happens to be more technical than the other. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dangerous A 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 It's your point to make whenever you're ready. Don't worry. He won't. If he tries. He'll fail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dazed Report post Posted July 14, 2004 (edited) brethart, stop being a jackass and ruining the thread. The first 6 or so pages of this thread were actually some interesting discussion. Then that person showed up. Posts along the lines of "Flair sucks bret rules" aren't really doing anything for the thread, so either back it up or please stop. Yes. Edited July 14, 2004 by nikjohns Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Continuing the somewhat epic nature of this entire discussion, I thought I'd link to a few interesting things: Torch Guest Editorial on Bret-Flair Buddy Landell weighs in, defends Flair Da Meltz Does Da Mail Da Meltz Does Da Mail, Part II There's also a great discussion going on at tOA about all of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 How is it different that Hart's legsweep, stomp to the mid-section, DDT, middle rope elbow drop every match? He was just as guilty of overusing spots as Flair was. Greg Valetine used the flop after the punches too. I'm probably sure several heels have done it before as well. I think the deal is that Bret's repetition seem more natural and seem like something a wrestler who had favorite moves would do. Where as Flair's seemed really contrived and silly, but they were over with the crowd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anticrombie Report post Posted July 14, 2004 No, no, no for the love of god let him go on...it's sad, but this clown is the one ray of sunshine in my life. I fell off my chair while I was laughing my ass off Sorry Ric Flair is famous for these spots. I am not debating with you no more your clearly a idiot. OK read this and now envision this guy saying it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BHK 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Thanks for the links Loss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gert T 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 I think the most interesting part of the Bret-Flair taking shots at each other is that both bring up so many points about what happens when the other was in a different fed. Were they together for what, about three years total? And yes, this thread is interesting on many varying levels. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Promoter 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 set an all-time TV ratings record in 1988 headlining the first Clash against Sting, broke his own record at Clash IX in a match that was the most watched wrestling match in US history for ten years against Terry Funk, Loss, I thought Hogan vs. Andre from NBC had the most viewers of all-time at over 33 million people and a 15.1 rating? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bigm350 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Damn, this thread is funny as hell. brethart is making a complete ass of himself by not backing up his claim that Flair sucks. Its funny he calls someone an idiot yet spells "claim", "clam". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pochorenella 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Man, those WON liks that Loss gave are just great! Meltzer sounds fairly impartial, although he does tend to lean towards Bret's side a little. To point out: - Bret has said on the radio show that Flair was so good he's not human. Now he says he can't work? - Flair never said Savage or Hart can't work. He said both are VERY GOOD, but not great. And that Shawn Michaels is better. Is "very good but not great" really that awful a thing to say? - He agrees Flair had no business stating the Owen/Montreal stuff. - He said Hart told him he agreed to put HBK over not in Montreal but in a Four-way in December. First time I ever heard this. Meltzer says that in next week's WON he'll tell what he feels is Bret's best carrying job, something Flair has never reached doing. Any ideas what it can be? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bigm350 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Wow, and I always thought that Meltzer was a huge Flair mark. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Promoter 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 pochonorella, the carry job most likely would be his match against Davey Boy Smith in England. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BHK 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 - He said Hart told him he agreed to put HBK over not in Montreal but in a Four-way in December. First time I ever heard this. If that's the first time you've heard that, you might want ot check this out: http://www.brethart.com/montreal/facts.asp As far as Bret being obsessed with the above goes, from what I personally know as just a Smark, not truly knowing intricate backstage workings, the only thing that comes to mind that's nearly as ugly is the Sid/Arn stabbing incident, which I've heard was quite the site to see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 It has to be Tom Magee. Meltzer once said it was the most fantastic carry job anyone had ever seen... enough that Vince wanted to the belt on him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shanghai Kid 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Landel gave exclusive comments to 1Wrestling.com about the controversy and leaves no doubt as to who he thinks is the best. "I've wrestled them both and if my thoughts mean anything, here goes! Ric Flair is the single greatest wrestler (bar none) that has ever been in our business. You see Flair arriving, you know here comes the champ. See him in the airport, here comes the champ. In the ring you get your money's worth - if you could ever find a seat! To the few, including myself, who have had the pleasure of wrestling the world champ, it was a tough long night ahead of you and you'd better be in shape. Bret was decent but a robot in my opinion. To someone who wrestled them both there was no comparison. Ric Flair has earned the right to say what ever the hell he wants to say." He knows more about it than we do. Bret= I Robot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Promoter 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Benoit has been called a robot too Landel is a great legend who has put on better matches than both Flair and Hart. He knows what he's talking about. I think Vince wanted to make him wwf champion at one time as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BHK 0 Report post Posted July 14, 2004 Landel's comments mean nothing. "Bret is a robot." Ok, how? why? when? In his selling? in his style? in the way he tells a story in the ring, the way he moves? what? That statement by itself doesn't mean anything. there's nothing that comes after it that's of any value. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites