AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Here are the top 50 players of my generation, 1984 to the present day. Only players whose whole careers encompassed that span are eligible. I made the list more in terms of career performance rather than peak performance, so players like Garnett or Kobe aren't as high as they would be if I did this list five years from now. Here they are: 50. Charles Oakley 49. Mookie Blaylock 48. Antoine Walker 47. Alvin Robertson 46. Otis Thorpe 45. Vin Baker 44. Kevin Willis 43. Brad Daugherty 42. Terry Porter 41. Paul Pierce 40. Anfernee Hardaway 39. Glen Rice 38. Detlef Schrempf 37. Vince Carter 36. Latrell Sprewell 35. Stephon Marbury 34. Ray Allen 33. Mark Jackson 32. Dennis Rodman 31. Alonzo Mourning 30. Mark Price 29. Dirk Nowitzki 28. Steve Nash 27. Shawn Kemp 26. Joe Dumars 25. Dikembe Mutombo 24. Tracy McGrady 23. Chris Mullin 22. Kevin Johnson 21. Grant Hill 20. Reggie Miller 19. Chris Webber 18. Mitch Richmond 17. Tim Hardaway 16. Kobe Bryant 15. Jason Kidd 14. Allen Iverson 13. Kevin Garnett 12. Scottie Pippen 11. Gary Payton 10. Clyde Drexler 9. Tim Duncan 8. Patrick Ewing 7. David Robinson 6. John Stockton 5. Charles Barkley 4. Shaquille O'Neal 3. Hakeem Olajuwon 2. Karl Malone 1. Michael Jordan There you have it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Grant Hill is too high for a person who sat out 3 years with bad legs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Grant Hill is too high for a person who sat out 3 years with bad legs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, but he was also five time All-NBA and a seven time all-star, that should count for something and it's more than just about anybody below him has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Scottie Pippen is the most consistently overrated player in any sport that I have ever seen. You have him ranked over KG and AI? That's a joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dangerous A 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Scottie Pippen is the most consistently overrated player in any sport that I have ever seen. You have him ranked over KG and AI? That's a joke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed. Pippen should be ranked somewhere in the 30's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 Scottie Pippen is the most consistently overrated player in any sport that I have ever seen. You have him ranked over KG and AI? That's a joke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed. Pippen should be ranked somewhere in the 30's. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That would put him ahead of at least a few of: 39. Glen Rice 38. Detlef Schrempf 37. Vince Carter 36. Latrell Sprewell 35. Stephon Marbury 34. Ray Allen 33. Mark Jackson 32. Dennis Rodman 31. Alonzo Mourning 30. Mark Price No way would I rank a player who made his career off of another player above any of those on this list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 I guess the fact that Pippen scored 18,940 points, had 6,135 assists, was named one of the 50 greatest players of all time, made All-NBA seven times, was selected for seven all-star games, and made all-defensive first team eight times in a row seems to slip people's minds. It's also very possible that Garnett and AI would end up ranked higher after their careers are over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 I guess the fact that Pippen scored 18,940 points, had 6,135 assists, was named one of the 50 greatest players of all time, made All-NBA seven times, was selected for seven all-star games, and made all-defensive first team eight times in a row seems to slip people's minds. It's also very possible that Garnett and AI would end up ranked higher after their careers are over. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nah, you're just bad at ranking people. Quit being defensive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2005 I guess the fact that Pippen scored 18,940 points, had 6,135 assists, was named one of the 50 greatest players of all time, made All-NBA seven times, was selected for seven all-star games, and made all-defensive first team eight times in a row seems to slip people's minds. It's also very possible that Garnett and AI would end up ranked higher after their careers are over. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nah, you're just bad at ranking people. Quit being defensive. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, God forbid I defend my own list with facts and figures. And who said I was being defensive? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 I'm not the president of Pippen's fan club or anything, but Jesus, give me a break, you guys. Detlef Schrempf and Glen Rice? I'm a big fan of both those guys, but you've got to be shitting me if you honestly think Pippen ranks with those guys. I don't really like to dwell on personal achievements too much, but what was posted above really speaks for itself. Granted, I think some of the All-defensive berths really are given out on reputation after you've been selected two or three times, but Pippen is 5th all-time in steals, and with 25 more of them would be third. And the eight first-teams in a row, without looking it up, I believe is unmatched. And he *did* make the Bulls a threat the year after Jordan retired, but no one was going to overcome Stern's "I'LL GET THE KNICKS TO THE FINALS OR DIE TRYING" campaign in '94. I could very easily have bought them winning a fourth straight that year. Pippen is top 15 at the absolute lowest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted June 21, 2005 I agree quite strongly with alf here. How you can not have Pippen as one of the top 15, especially against who you're talking about here, is beyond me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 He played his entire career with Michael Jordan, that's how. What did he do without him? OH nothing. That's right. He was a good defender and an average scorer and that's it. That top 50 players of all time list was a joke. Making all-star teams doesn't make you great, just popular. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Michael Jordan, and Michael Jordan alone, wouldn't have won all those titles. Even if he was the best player to have ever played the game (which is debateable), it was having Pippen, Rodman, and the triangle offense, and whole host of other great players that propelled the Bulls to all those championships and dominate for so long. And to play devil's advocate here, what did Michael Jordan do without Scottie Pippen? After 1998, neither did much of anything, with the exception of Scottie helping the Blazers reach the Western Conference Finals and take the eventual champ Lakers to 7 games. Pippen was an excellent defender and a good scorer, and complemented Jordan's skills nicely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 I think you are underestimating Jordan greatly here VX. I'd love for you to name some of that whole host of other great players too. Bill Wennington? Luc Longley? Who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 I don't think he's underestimating the Jordan. THe point is that Jordan won championships when Pippen was on his teams, and wasn't quiote good enough without Pippen. And people forget that Pippen was on the 2000 Portland Trailblazers, who nearly made the Finals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 When did Jordan play without Pippen? How old was he? That Portland team was stacked too, Rasheed Wallace, Damon Stoudamire, Steve Smith, Arvydas Sabonis, Bonzi Wells, Jermaine O'Neal, Detlef Schrempf. All better than ANYONE that Jordan had outside of Rodman really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brett Favre 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Dude you just ignored the years Jordan wasn't with the Bulls in '94, and '95. Pippen lead the Bulls to 55 wins one year, and 47 the other, and lost in 6 and 7 games in the playoffs, in the conference semi-finals. Oh, and Jordan had Pippen. Jermaine O'Neal didn't play shit with the Blazers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 What did he win those years (Pippen that is)? I know Jordan had Pippen, I was talking about the surrounding cast for both teams. I hope you are not going to tell me that Chicago's roster was EVER better than that Portland team (during the years Jordan was there). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 What did he win those years (Pippen that is)? I know Jordan had Pippen, I was talking about the surrounding cast for both teams. I hope you are not going to tell me that Chicago's roster was EVER better than that Portland team (during the years Jordan was there). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> By the same token, what did Kevin Garnett and Allen Iverson win? You argued that Pippen does not rank with those two, when they do not have superior championship credentials. So what makes them better than Pippen? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ripper 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 The fact that anyone is even trying to argue that pippen isn't in the top 15 of the players of this generation is ridiculous. Is is one of the best on the ball defenders of all time. he could score, he could run the point, he could rebound, he could block shots. All excedingly well. And dude...really...I am an Atlanta fan and I got to say Kevin Willis and Mookie Blaylock being on the list while Steve Smith and a GOD of a man like Tom Chambers not being on there is a crime. I know its your opinion and all, but seriously....Tom fucking Chambers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Didn't Chambers start before 84, though. This list is players whose entire careers happened since 84. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 What did he win those years (Pippen that is)? I know Jordan had Pippen, I was talking about the surrounding cast for both teams. I hope you are not going to tell me that Chicago's roster was EVER better than that Portland team (during the years Jordan was there). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> By the same token, what did Kevin Garnett and Allen Iverson win? You argued that Pippen does not rank with those two, when they do not have superior championship credentials. So what makes them better than Pippen? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're clearly missing my point. Pippen played with Jordan. In my opinion, that's the only reason he won a damn thing. I'm not saying he wasn't GOOD, just not GREAT. He was a good player who's career was MADE by playing alongside one of, if not THE best player of all time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crimson Platypus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Oh and one more thing: 24. Tracy McGrady 23. Chris Mullin Just no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Lushus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 What did he win those years (Pippen that is)? I know Jordan had Pippen, I was talking about the surrounding cast for both teams. I hope you are not going to tell me that Chicago's roster was EVER better than that Portland team (during the years Jordan was there). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> By the same token, what did Kevin Garnett and Allen Iverson win? You argued that Pippen does not rank with those two, when they do not have superior championship credentials. So what makes them better than Pippen? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're clearly missing my point. Pippen played with Jordan. In my opinion, that's the only reason he won a damn thing. I'm not saying he wasn't GOOD, just not GREAT. He was a good player who's career was MADE by playing alongside one of, if not THE best player of all time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm with Crimson, history has shown that Scottie can't win without Michael...I shouldn't even have to explain said history... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ripper 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 How does history show that? I think if you look at his post Jordan history, he was averaging around 45-50 wins per season. Plus seriously, 55 wins out of a Bulls team with Pete Fucking MYERS being part of the big three major offensive threats. Stop and think about that for a second. Pete FUCKING MYERS. If not for that bullshit call against the Knicks the Bulls would have went on to get destroyed by the Rockets in the Finals instead of the knicks. Like it has been said. Look at his points, steals, blocks, assist, what he did to opposing players...dude really is top 15 since 1984. And if it is peoples whos entire career was from 1984, then okay. No Tom Chambers. But damn...Steve Smith did alot more for Atlanta than Mookie Blaylock. Mookie just had a name that stood out.(actually I like mookie...he just was no Smity) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Oh and one more thing: 24. Tracy McGrady 23. Chris Mullin Just no. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This is a career ranking, I'm going to post my "peak" rankings later. Chambers started in '83, so he misses it by one year. Steve Smith was a pretty decent scorer but I don't think he was top 50 material. Willis makes it on their for longevity, if nothing else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ripper 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 What did he win those years (Pippen that is)? I know Jordan had Pippen, I was talking about the surrounding cast for both teams. I hope you are not going to tell me that Chicago's roster was EVER better than that Portland team (during the years Jordan was there). <{POST_SNAPBACK}> By the same token, what did Kevin Garnett and Allen Iverson win? You argued that Pippen does not rank with those two, when they do not have superior championship credentials. So what makes them better than Pippen? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're clearly missing my point. Pippen played with Jordan. In my opinion, that's the only reason he won a damn thing. I'm not saying he wasn't GOOD, just not GREAT. He was a good player who's career was MADE by playing alongside one of, if not THE best player of all time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But the other point is that Jordan wouldn't have won SHIT without Scottie Pippen. Thats right. I will say it. Pippen was the guy that would fuck up the other teams offense and shut down their big time player. If it weren't for scottie shutting down Mark Jackson, the Pacers would have spanked the Bulls a couple of those years. Same thing with the Knicks, and when they finally took the Pistons. It was Scottie that did what was necessary. When the Blazers were blowing the Bulls out in game 6 of the finals, it was scottie and a bunch of reserves that got the game tied with Mike on the bench, ending it there(cause they did not want to fuck with Portland in a game 7 in portland). The guy did the dirty work, the clean work and everything else in between while Mike scored alot of points. Pippen kept that offense going Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 The finals are 2-3-2, remember. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Lushus 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 oh please Rip, if it wasn't Scottie it would have been someone else, come off it...if he's so instrumental in helping Jordan win the titles, why couldn't he help someone else elevate their game? bullshit calls aside, he alone couldn't get the job done... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfdogg 0 Report post Posted June 21, 2005 Since the argument against Pippen seems to be that he couldn't win on his own, where are the complaints about Patrick Ewing being in the top ten? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites