Downhome Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 This more than likely doesn't mean anything, but I figured a lot of you would have something witty to say about it. From PWInsider: There's talk about making Hacksaw Duggan a recurring character, possibly as half of a tag team with Goldust.
EdwardKnoxII Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 Or better yet move him over to SD and have him and Booker teamup/feud. And better yet it makes sense.
bob_barron Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 This a comment that doesn't warrant a thread. Oh and I'd mark out.
Dangerous A Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 "Hacksaw" Jim Duggan & Goldust - Tag Team Champions? No. Just, no.
Promoter Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 I agree. Isn't it funny how they say "making Hacksaw Duggan a recurring character" instead of wrestler, while at the same time wanting to make him a tag team? What a concept! Next week, Thea will return and tag with Shelton against Kane and Big Show. Sports entertainment at its finest
jester Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 This more than likely doesn't mean anything, but I figured a lot of you would have something witty to say about it. From PWInsider: There's talk about making Hacksaw Duggan a recurring character, possibly as half of a tag team with Goldust. Wow. The one wrestler I hate more than Hogan. I look forward to the epic Randy "Legendkiller" Orton vs. "Fuckstick" Jim Duggan feud
Dobbs 3K Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis.
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 I guess they are trying to fill out the thin rosters. I don't mind them being used on 24/7 for kicks, but it is ridiculous now.
Placebo Effect Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis. I do. Wrestlecrap > Bland, run of the mill crap
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 More mama Benjamin and Lightning bolts striking the ring then! Fidel Castro's gimmick fits right in here.
Guest Evolution Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis. I do. Wrestlecrap > Bland, run of the mill crap I concur with this. If WWE can't make good wrestling television, they better either do it terribly or just not do it at all, because bland television where you can't even say "This is total Wrestlecrap" is just boring.
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis. I do. Wrestlecrap > Bland, run of the mill crap I concur with this. If WWE can't make good wrestling television, they better either do it terribly or just not do it at all, because bland television where you can't even say "This is total Wrestlecrap" is just boring. This is true somewhat, but I think that was Russo's intention after being red taped so much and we know how that turned out for wcw.
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Russo wasn't intentionally being that crap.
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Well, that's what he claims in his book. That eventually he just saw the writing on the wall and started doing things to amuse himself like becoming champion.
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Russo claims a lot of things.
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Russo claims a lot of things. I guess you don't buy him single handedly bringing the wwe back to the #1 position then in 1998 and 1999 NoCalMike huh?
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Russo claims a lot of things. I guess you don't buy him single handily bringing the wwe back to the #1 position then in 1998 and 1999 He was part of that success, no doubt about that. The key word is 'part'. In his recent WOL appearance, Russo tried to take credit for WWE getting super hot in 2000-1.
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Oh, I'm being sarcastic about the Russo thing. He does talk a lot of crap. I remember The Rock saying he came up with his own material and not Russo on OTR one time.
Guest Timmer Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis. Reasons: 24/7 Wrestling channel Also: For Golddust: he's Dusty's son and he still is one of the best workers on the roster For Duggan: Cause some dumb writer thought of the "hoooo" connection :rolleye:
justcoz Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 I'd rather see a Goldust/Boogieman tag team, putting Boogieman in a tag team situation would mask his obvious weakness as a worker while still playing on the strengths of the character.
Prime Time Andrew Doyle Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 That could work, but in the end it is still a freak tagging with a guy who eats worms.
Toxxic Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 That could work, but in the end it is still a freak tagging with a guy who eats worms. And you're telling me that combination doesn't go together?
Si82 Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 For Golddust: he's Dusty's son and he still is one of the best workers on the roster If his TNA run was anything to go by then I doubt he's one of the best workers on the roster.
thuganomics Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Why is WWE obsessed with bringing in these journeymen types who aren't even true "legends" and trying to push them? No one seriously wants to see Jim Duggan on a recurring basis. I do. Wrestlecrap > Bland, run of the mill crap I wish I didn't agree with that statement, but I do. I'd take Goldust/Duggan as a comedy team of champions over Show & Kane doing nothing with their titles in a heartbeat. Maybe they'll actually be entertaining too...
Promoter Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Guys, I hope you know what your asking for here When things get really ridiculous this thread is to blame
LivingLegendGaryColeman Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 For Golddust: he's Dusty's son and he still is one of the best workers on the roster If his TNA run was anything to go by then I doubt he's one of the best workers on the roster. I think that's true, but for some strange reason to me at least, it always seems like Dustin puts on his A-Game as Goldust. Not TAFKA Goldust, or himself, when he is Goldust, he seems extra motivated almost.
4hartthreat Posted February 8, 2006 Report Posted February 8, 2006 Eh, I still prefer chaosrage's idea of a Goldust/Vader comedy team from a few months ago......
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now