Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Doesn't scream out "I'M A WRESTLING FAN!" (unless someone knows who Booker T is), isn't over the top, plus I don't see the WWE logo (although I'm sure it will be on the actual shirt). What say ye? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Coffey Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's decent...but it'd be SO much better if it was just the Booker logo on the front and that was it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PLAGIARISM! 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Agreed, as with all WWE shirts, NO NEED FOR THE BACK PRINT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PLAGIARISM! 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 That said, they are getting closer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Princess Leena Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Close, but any wrestler's name on the shirt automatically kills it for public viewing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaceman Spiff 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Yeah, I'd lose the "Booker T" on the front, but the catchphrase on the back doesn't bother me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest droptoehold Report post Posted June 1, 2006 damn...i might buy it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LJSexay 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 agreed on the notion to remove the front text. It would be completely wearable, and even kinda cool, if it didn't have BOOKER T on the front. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
geniusMoment 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 But, most people might think you're just a fan of Booker T Washington. Who was famous for his use of the word sucka. Plus, I heard he was an OG, a straight thug. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mfn 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 I still wear my DX shirt. Does that make me a loser? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just John 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Wouldn't removing Booker T from the front defeat the purpose of it being a WRESTLING shirt? I don't know why WWE would try to appeal to closet fans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Coffey Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest droptoehold Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cran Da Maniac 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Put it in really small print on the tag or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
claydude14 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt I'm calling bullshit. Chain Gang shirts don't all say Cena and I'm sure he gets royalties. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt I'm calling bullshit. Chain Gang shirts don't all say Cena and I'm sure he gets royalties. Hogan got royalties from NWO shirts. His name was nowhere to be found...that was WCW though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maztinho 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt I'm calling bullshit. Chain Gang shirts don't all say Cena and I'm sure he gets royalties. Hogan got royalties from NWO shirts. His name was nowhere to be found...that was WCW though. Yet it could be argued that Hogan was the nWo so he would still get royalties. He was the face of the nWo... shoe polish beard and all. The Chain Gang thing could be because it's directly linked to that wrestlers persona, ala Hulkamaniacs, or whatever. Back onto the shirt itself. I'd buy it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lt. Al Giardello 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 Only of the few(along with the Carlito shirt) t-shirts I'd wear in public. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2006 I still wear my DX shirt. Does that make me a loser? Yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
geniusMoment 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 I still wear my DX shirt. Does that make me a loser? Yes. In all fairness he would be a loser regardless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunter's Torn Quad 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt I'm calling bullshit. Chain Gang shirts don't all say Cena and I'm sure he gets royalties. Hogan got royalties from NWO shirts. His name was nowhere to be found...that was WCW though. Hogan got royalties from actions figures that weren't even his. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Masked Man of Mystery 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 There have been some really bad shirts in the past, but having a name on it doesn't make it a bad shirt. If you're that embarassed to be a wrestling fan in public, that's your problem, but a name won't make me not wear a shirt. It's more I can't buy them in a store(unless someone knows of a real store that sells WWE or TNA shirts) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Satanico Report post Posted June 2, 2006 A perfectly acceptable shirt. The front design wise is better without the name, but the name doesn't affect it's public wearability. The back graphic is a phrase that's not linked solely to pro wrestling, so no foul. If it came in brown, the public would be more likely to see it as a "blaxsploitation" style shirt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawk 34 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 Am I the only one who thinks if the back was on the front without the booker t name or logo, it'd be more public fitting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daileyxplanet 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 Am I the ONLY one who is annoyed by the apparent lack of a question mark? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karnage 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 Million Dollar Man's new t-shirt is awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ravenbomb 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 It's a PICTURE of Booker T. Why would you need more than that? In order to collect royalties you need to have your name somewhere on the shirt I'm calling bullshit. Chain Gang shirts don't all say Cena and I'm sure he gets royalties. Hogan got royalties from NWO shirts. His name was nowhere to be found...that was WCW though. Hogan got royalties from actions figures that weren't even his. I can't tell if you're joking or not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Buzz 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 Hmm..I don't own any wrestling shirts, but a shirt is a shirt. Who give a fuck if someone likes you wearing it or not. Why be ashamed of being a wrestling fan if you enjoy it? I just don't get it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Cucaracha 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 That looks more like something Booker would wear during a face run than a heel run. I'm not sure why. Doesn't seem like the shirt one of the top heels on your roster would wear. That DiBiase shirt is fantastic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haVoc 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2006 Only two T-Shirts I've liked in recent years are Edge's And Kurt Angle's "American By Birth, Angry By Choice." Couldn't find a pic of the Angle shirt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
