NYU

Ah, my apologies then, Squirtle. Sorry to drag your name through that mess.

Obviously you've forgotten the now CLASSIC thread of "The Real TSM." Lucky you.

Only start clicking it where it was ONCE THE MOVIE HAS FINISHED. It should only take three clicks until you see the panel.

He points to a tiny area on the wall. Make sure you notice exactly where that star-like point is. After the video is finished and you're left looking at the wall, click on it about 3-5 times. Then a panel should appear on that wall. Click on the panel and it should uncover a safe.

Already solved this although it took me a long time to do it. If you're REALLY desperate, this is what you do (Highlight for spoilers): You play the video of the guy dancing. He points to a tiny mark on the wall. Click on it a couple of times and it should uncover a safe. Click on the safe and you'll have to enter a 4-number code. That link they give you on the note will tell you the code (Hint: 1994) Use the key to open the safe and there, you should finally be closer to solving it.

Hey, get off my case or I'll force 100 pages of Drury posts on you. No Thanks Or then again, he could force 100 pages of BBCW posts on you. Pick your poison carefully.

Uhm...So what? So? It's not pathetically bad. You know more about the material rather than less. I'm not saying 50% is GOOD. I'm just saying it just seems to have gotten a bad rap. And oh yeah, Eddie vs. Angle......B- so far. But I'm not feeling the drug-addict angle. It was uncomfortable enough during the Eddie/Brock "feud", and now we're continuing it with this. I don't find it too entertaining, and I think this Eddie/Kurt feud could be built up so much better than that.

It's more than half the material. I've always felt people have been way too harsh on scoring in the 50 percentile. I mean, it's not THAT terrible. You know more about the topic rather than less.

I don't like when people start criticizing Mel over not denouncing his father's comments in public. Obviously, his dad's comments are ridiculous and terribly offensive. But that doesn't change the fact that Mel is STILL his son and it certainly wouldn't be right for him to come out in public and speak out against his own DAD - who he's still friendly with. Those are the foundations of breaking apart a family. My dad isn't exactly the most politically-correct person around. He has been known to say a stupid comment here or there. But I would never denounce him in front of friends and family, and start chastising him for what he just said. It's your parent, and you have to respect his opinion, no matter how wrong or non-PC it may be. I just think it's unreasonable that people expect Mel to trash his father all over the media and say that whatever he said is ridiculously false. Anybody here that says they would do that to their own parent clearly doesn't have a healthy relationship with them.

hi, my name is George, I'm unemployed and I live with my parents.

WHOOSH!!

I'm not acting as if those effects will come overnight. But if these firings go through, it's very possible we could begin to get to those points. All those incidents you talked about - it was all before Nipplegate. That one incident with Janet Jackson changed the entire monitoring system of the FCC. Do you think they want to deal with Congress calling for hearings and fines? I doubt it. That whole hearing about the F-Bomb being allowed in a description sense on television, I am absolutely sure it's being reconsidered now. Tell me, how many network - or even cable - shows have you heard use "fuck" yet? Personally, I haven't heard any. Nudity on national television? Since the Superbowl? When and where? ER had to recently edit an episode where someone's breast was partially revealed. Why? Because of how pathetically PC America is becoming. Doesn't exactly prove your point. I'm saying that this could potentially become a huge deal with the airwaves in America. Call it what you want, but these two DJs are being censored. And correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the morning slot. Children should be getting ready for school. Their parents should be helping them. Their parents should be driving their children for school, or getting them ready for the busstop. The children should then be IN school. There shouldn't be a way for them to get a hold of the radio and listen to Howard Stern, if they have parents that are taking part in the morning routine. If the parents are involved, the children don't have easy access to this timeslot because they're being monitored on the way to school. Be reasonable here. It's not like we're talking about the after-school slot. Congress is starting to get involved in FCC matters. Colin Powell's son has made it a goal of his to clean up the airwaves the best he can. TV and radio will not go back to the way it was before. Take a closer look at what will be on the radio and television in the upcoming months. If this trend continues, it's inevitable that America will soon be entering a cleanup mode in its entertainment - a cleanup mode that could become much more drastic than firing two "shock-jocks."

But why now? Why not 10 or 15 years ago when the show was the absolute hot topic of controversy? At this point, the Howard Stern Show is relatively tame compared to what it was. Yet, it's being singled out now more than ever. It can't be denied that the FCC is doing this to cover themselves on Nipplegate. They want to show that they're making contributions on the fight against indecent programming, and who's a better target than Howard Stern? But the timing, and seemingly the reason that sparked it all, does not make sense. Those on a radio show really can not be considered liable for their callers. They can do their best to screen the callers, but once they reach the air, not much more can be done. Howard didn't say the racial slurs himself. No one on his show did. It was a caller that did it in a disappointing attempt to be funny, and it wound up backfiring. Yet, how can Howard can be considered at fault for something a caller said? From what I heard, for the most part, the slur was edited out anyway with the delay. So what's the problem? The problem is, once again, the FCC is looking for a scapegoat. But come on, what are we talking about here? I understand that the purpose of the FCC is to regulate decent programming, but who's to determine what is decent? I could understand them stepping in if Howard got on the radio and demanded all his listeners to take out all the blacks of the world in an evil, sadistic attack. I could understand them stepping in if Bubba started calling out to his listeners, asking them to bomb their local government building to make a stand. These are things that OBVIOUSLY should be monitored against. But talking about sex? Talking about a lesbian in the studio? Mentioning cocaine on the air? THESE are fireable offenses? These are the kind of topics that need to be fought against for the common good of society? Sex and drugs? Talking about hate crimes and attacking the government are dangerous to society and should obviously not be allowed. But talking about sex on the air is what freedom of speech falls under! It doesn't hurt anybody and it doesn't put any lives in danger! When does it become enough? Soon, we'll take away all those that talk about sex and drugs on the radio. Then, those songs that have any suggestive sexual, drug, or "offensive" content will be banned from the airwaves. We'll soon come to making sure simple words like "hell", "damn", and "ass" are banned from being spoken on the radio. Any topic that can be considered offensive to another will be taken off the air eventually. This would mean no more talk shows on politics - Bye Bye Rush Limbaugh. Sporting fans will begin to become alienated with calls about how other teams are better than the home team, so those fans will start a pettion. Sports call-in radio shows will be gone. What will we be left with? Stations and stations of classical music, jazz, and broadcast tests. You need to draw the line somewhere because that is what the airwaves of the country will resort to. By banning radio shows like this, for no real foreseeable reason at this point, this country is regressing. We would be going back to the days where talking about a controversial topic in public is taboo. And, at this point, it doesn't really help anybody in the end.

The Six Markets: Pittsburgh Ft. Lauderdale Orlando Rochester Louisville San Diego There is also a serious possibility that Infinity Broadcasting could be dropping Stern soon. That would basically mean he'd be off the air.

From what I heard, this whole controversy is over a caller asking Solomon if he ever "banged any n***ers or s**cs before." (I'm not even sure exactly what we could say on these forums now, hence the editing) Of course, it was a caller that used this language and he was promptly hung up on. But the FCC doesn't look at matters like that. They've been gunning for Howard for years and years and figured, with the Congressional hearing coming up, they would take the quickest advantage they could. Again, just imagine: A boob falling out during a FOOTBALL game has led to possibly the biggest mess ever when it comes to Freedom of Speech.

And in a related story.....having to deal with Bubba the Love Sponge.... Both from CNN.com This is censorship at its absolute worst. Regardless if you're a fan of Stern or Sponge, this could really become an extremely serious issue sooner rather than later. This kind of censorship is only going to continue until TV and radio have been completely castrated. Freedom of speech?! Where the hell is it?! And imagine....all this because of one simple tit.......

Yeah, and I don't clean. Well, cooking's out. Cleaning's out. Looks like we're left with only one other thing for the females on the island..... It's baby-making time. -NYU ....cause we all know women can't do the hard work .

OMG YES LET'S MAKE BABIES!!!!!!!1111111 you stud you. No, you only want me for my culinary skills *runs off sobbing in the new post apocalyptic world* Perhaps I'm way off here, but I detected a little bit of sarcasm in WJM's post.

Where the hell did you get that ridiculous idea from?

Maybe a little, but not much. Feel free to insult the religions of others, as long as you don't use the "N-Word" while you do it.

Well, the question is: If you make it and Zack doesn't, are you going to be all weepy over the fact that he didn't survive? Or will babymaking become a high priority? That could change my list a little

Bah, this is bullshit. My countless contributions to TSM have been ignored. As for the list.... RRR AngleSault KKKTookMyBabyAway Canadian Chick Cancer Marney Hoff Frigid Soul Sass Piss Bring Back Charlie Ward - always need one person to make fun of.

Today in the Current Events folder, Mole started the one and only Why do people like George Washington? thread. TheMikeSC immediately caused a controversy by exclaiming THIS IS DEMOCRATIC GARBAGE!. Jobber of the Week called TheMikeSC a Nazi supporter. MrRant chimed in with FLUFF~! adding INTENSE ANGER to the topic. DrTom warned Jobber of the Week that he was using a dreaded N-Word and was being suspended for 2 days. Cancer Marney felt Jobber of the Week was suspended unfairly and started a poll to end this disgusting male tyranny. Sass moved the topic to the WWE Folder saying that was the hopeless folder. Loss also warned that he didn’t want 15 topics started on the subject, and locked the thread and moved it to Site Feedback.

*dodges the wrath of the fiery Hyuiken dragon before slashing it with the blade of SAMURAI DESTRUCTION to gain 10 HP* *after using 20 MP to perform such a swift move, is susceptible to the GLORGON NAIL-SCRATCH OF CONDOR and FLYING ORGEN SHOE OF DISCOMFORT from the Ethnic Queens. Does not pass go. Does not collect 200 ruby simoleans*

They can't add to it. Even if the thread isn't locked, the topic won't allow you to add onto it because it has already been moved to the Classics Folder (which is read-only) OMG~! LOCK TOPIC PLZ!OASLKA~!@!