Guest Duncan Eternia Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 I think the Taker line is total BS. Sounds like more 1wrestling crap designed to make a stir. I am sure some things were said but that line just sounds too made up.
Lil' Bitch Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 You can't be serious, Rico. With the FBI and Vince run-ins??? Its called Shawn Michaels Syndrome. When he does decided to put somebody over, its hardly clean.
Prophet of Mike Zagurski Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 . Brock's been put over by Taker on multiple occasions HiaC and.....?????? The Royal Rumble
Spaceman Spiff Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 This was echoed at the Smackdown meeting on Tuesday, when a major member of the roster allegedly said something similar to "Let's all get over so that The Undertaker can come back and beat us two at a time, even though he doesn't draw anymore" I volunteer to have this guy's man-babies.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 11, 2004 Report Posted January 11, 2004 This was echoed at the Smackdown meeting on Tuesday, when a major member of the roster allegedly said something similar to "Let's all get over so that The Undertaker can come back and beat us two at a time, even though he doesn't draw anymore" That sounds WAY too Smark-ish. I highly doubt any wrestler would define someone by how much they draw, otherwise everyones the blame. If someone DID say it, it's either Brock or Big Show, but I still think it's BullShit.
HarleyQuinn Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 This was echoed at the Smackdown meeting on Tuesday, when a major member of the roster allegedly said something similar to "Let's all get over so that The Undertaker can come back and beat us two at a time, even though he doesn't draw anymore" I doubt it for the bolded words. So it's an alleged, similar wording that happens to be followed by a very descriptive Smarkish quote...hmmm
Spaceman Spiff Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 Why not? You hear guys like Ole Anderson (shoot interview) and Dusty (in the Flair DVD), to name a few, talk about "drawing money", so why wouldn't today's guys use it? Especially in reference to a guy like Taker who hardly "gives the rub" to the younger guys (never did a clean job to Cena, beat Brock & Show in a 3-way to set up a feud w/ *Vince*), and who always works to make sure he gets his win at WM to preserve his streak. If anybody has a right to throw around "smart" talk, it's guys in the business.
Corey_Lazarus Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 Damn you, Kotz! I was planning on doing the Ghostbusters quotes in reply to that!
SuperJerk Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 According to Dave Scherer the person who said this is a babyface. My money is on Cena now Where was this?
Steviekick Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 According to Dave Scherer the person who said this is a babyface. My money is on Cena now Where was this? From what we have heard previously, it doesn't sound like something Cena would say. Besides, he wouldn't want to start messing up his push now, would he?
Guest Korgath Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 I think we're all just getting worked up over a comment that may or may not (which is where my money is, incidentally) be true. The company's not exactly doing too well at the moment, and they're talking about layoffs post WrestleMania... I doubt anyone would actually say that, unless he was drunk or smoking pot. Which, in both cases, are trademarks of RAW wrestlers.
geniusMoment Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 They never said the wrestler made the remark during the meeting for everyone to hear. It probably was just one of the guys telling one of his friends after the meeting what a bunch of crap the meeting was. This takes no guts, in fact it happens in every place of employment.
Art Sandusky Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 Damn you, Kotz! I was planning on doing the Ghostbusters quotes in reply to that! (wins)
Art Sandusky Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 In these times of crisis, only one man can save the day: This is quickly becoming my favorite running gag.
Guest Stunt Granny Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 It was Willie the Worker!!!!!! Willie Lives!!!!!!!!
Guest Dynamite Kido Posted January 12, 2004 Report Posted January 12, 2004 The funny thing is that Raw has been better than Smackdown for a good while now, yet it gets the "more intense" pep talk. Raw never gets pre-empted for real sports..........unless you remember the dog shows from the USA days. But that's because Spike TV doesn't cover any sports. Just wait one day Raw will lose its time spot for NASCAR, Monster Trucks, Rodeo. or Rock N Bowl
OldSchoolWrestling Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 GOLDBERG UPDATE, NEWS FROM LAST NIGHT'S MEETING AND MORE BACKSTAGE NOTES FROM RAW by Dave Scherer Updated: 1/13/2004 2:19:21 PM As they did at last week’s Smackdown, WWE had a talent meeting before Raw last night. It was made clear that the meetings will be a weekly event, as they will be at Smackdown as well, where Vince McMahon and company will critique matches from the previous week, “not as a way of criticizing the talent but instead as a teaching tool”. The wrestlers were told to watch the recent match between HHH and Shawn Michaels as being an example of what the guys need to do to get their work over and make him or herself a better character. There was the usual talk of stepping up and seizing opportunities, though a number of people that I spoke with thought that rang hollow since it’s up to creative to give them chances to do so, not to mention that Shawn and HHH got a half hour of TV time for their match. Vince also talked about the landscape of the business today, making reference to “Ted Turner folding his tent and walking away from wrestling”, even though Turner was not in the position to do so at the time WCW was sold. A few people who were at the meeting actually told me that they believe Vince himself is starting to think that some of WWE’s revisionist history concerning the WCW wars is actually true now. Something else that had a number of the wrestlers laughing after the meeting came from a comment that Vince made when he addressed the troops. He said that it always shocks him when a wrestler turns his back to his opponent in the ring. Of course, as the wrestlers pointed out to me, there is no one guiltier of that transgression that Vince’s son-in-law. According to the people I spoke with today, the general feeling was that if you had to bet right now on whether Goldberg would be with WWE after WrestleMania, the smart money would be placed on him not being around. That is, of course, hardly scientific. There weren’t a lot of glowing feelings after the weekend house show tour through Canada. The houses weren’t great (and get worse after the conversion from the Canadian to US dollar) and because of the fact that they chartered a jet, the wrestler payoffs aren’t expected to be very good.
Guest webmasterofwrestlegame Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 At least Vince sees some familiar things from WCW's demise here.
Guest Quik Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 The wrestlers were told to watch the recent match between HHH and Shawn Michaels as being an example of what the guys need to do to get their work over and make him or herself a better character. Allright, so from now on Shawn will simply carry everyone on the roster to at least *** matches. First two people he'll face are Randy Orton and Batista. Then Trips will officially end his career. Maybe Flair will get a chair shot in, it's not 100% certain yet.
Spaceman Spiff Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 The wrestlers were told to watch the recent match between HHH and Shawn Michaels as being an example of what the guys need to do to get their work over and make him or herself a better character. Yes, do what HBK does and no sell damage to a body part that gets worked on for the majority of the match.
Zetterberg is God Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 Something else that had a number of the wrestlers laughing after the meeting came from a comment that Vince made when he addressed the troops. He said that it always shocks him when a wrestler turns his back to his opponent in the ring. Of course, as the wrestlers pointed out to me, there is no one guiltier of that transgression that Vince’s son-in-law. That's pretty funny.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 I'm sorry but I'm not clear on that.... what does that mean, turn his back on his opponent? As in not listening to what his opponent says or simply turning around on his opponent?
razazteca Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 The wrestlers were told to watch the recent match between HHH and Shawn Michaels as being an example of what the guys need to do to get their work over and make him or herself a better character. Yes, do what HBK does and no sell damage to a body part that gets worked on for the majority of the match. Mark Henry must of been taking notes.
Guest webmasterofwrestlegame Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 It means literally turn his back on an opponent through a match. Its one of Vince's pet hates - another one is wrestlers who do not try and block punches when they are being pounded on.
The Tino Standard Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 Ricky Steamboat was a HUGE believer in not turning your back on your opponent... Vince is not alone in that mindset.
DMann2003 Posted January 13, 2004 Report Posted January 13, 2004 OMG, Vince & Steamboat agree on something regarding a wrestling match? Doesn't that mean the world caves in or something?
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted January 14, 2004 Report Posted January 14, 2004 I can see why they believe that. Considering in a fight it's common knowledge not to turn your back on the opponent.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now