Guest MikeSC Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 Prove it. Can you prove otherwise? -=Mike
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 (edited) Nope, but I'm not sitting here making asinine assumptions, either. Go ahead and research it, or shut the fuck up, mmkay? You're the one who brought the topic up in the first place. Prove it or continue being a joke. Your call! Edited February 13, 2004 by Tyler McClelland
Guest MikeSC Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 Nope, but I'm not sitting here making asinine assumptions, either. Go ahead and research it, or shut the fuck up, mmkay? You're the one who brought the topic up in the first place. Prove it or continue being a joke. Your call! Wow, aren't you a bigger fucktard than usual? I think I'll go back to ignoring you. I don't need a drooling moron who can't grasp political science basics attempting to ruin my good mood by being an epic jackass. I know, my being a joke "threatens" your "spot" here, but such animosity is not needed. Toodles. -=Mike ...Although, would you please endorse Kerry? I want to see that Tyler magic work for John as it did for good ol' Howie. Man, did THAT campaign fizzle.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!!! MIKE: No offense, but do you want to compare HIS accuracy in reporting against, say, the NY Times? Drudge never invented stories out of nothing. ME: Yes. MIKE: JAYSON BLAIR!!! ROFLSREFMSAO ME: One journalist vs. Drudge's many rumors. Care to give us numbers? MIKE: Can you prove otherwise? ME: The burden of proof is on you. MIKE: ......I'm gonna take my ball and go home. C'iao!
Michrome Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 Do you debate like a four year old in real life too?
Jobber of the Week Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 God knows, international opinion is a HUGE deal for us. We lose sleep over the concern of the French/Italians/what have you not respecting us. It truly is the single most important issue in front of the U.S. And now you know how the French feel.
Jobber of the Week Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 Wow, aren't you a bigger fucktard than usual? I think I'll go back to ignoring you. I don't need a drooling moron who can't grasp political science basics attempting to ruin my good mood by being an epic jackass. I know, my being a joke "threatens" your "spot" here, but such animosity is not needed. Toodles. -=Mike LOL!!!!!!!!! YOU want to make extravagant claims, and then when someone asks you for some proof, you decide it's not worth wasting your time? Usually you put up a much better arguement than that, Mike.
Dr. Tom Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 It'd be hard to prove, anyway. You'd have to verify thousands of stories with outside sources, and that's more research than anyone should put into something that's not a doctoral thesis. Personally, I think Jayson Blair trumps Drudge BECAUSE the Times is a longstanding print medium that's interested in preserving an honest reputation, while Drudge has the internet stigma working against him.
Guest Cerebus Posted February 13, 2004 Report Posted February 13, 2004 Ok, let me see if I got this right. I make comment with no evidence or citation other than my own personal opinion/experirence. Someone asks me to prove it. I respond its not my job to back up my own statement but its the job of the other person to believe my statement UNLESS they can provide a citation to prove me otherwise. Gotcha.
tommytomlin Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 Don't you see? Mike is better at POLITICAL SCIENCE than Tyler, so he doesn't HAVE to explain his ridiculous theories. Doesn't 'the left' know ANYTHING?
Vyce Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 My new standard reply, to anyone who ever says anything to me on this board, is "PROVE IT!" Prove it = the new "Deal with it!"
snuffbox Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 It is pretty comical, Mike usually seems to put up a pretty good arguement...I think this one and its backlash just adds to the comedy I guess. It would be pretty dificult to prove which is the more reliable source - Drudge or the NY Times. Both have their positives, negatives, and histories. It was just pretty ridiculous of the poli sci guru to make such a grand claim then use 'prove it' for his own reasoning. Would have been much better off leaving it alone, arguing over two different news sources reliability is inherantly fultile and basically useless.
Vyce Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 Let's all meet in the middle - the rumor is that Time's going to go with the story next week. If Time does publish the story - and, I must assume, we can take it as face value as they SHOULD verify the story with their sources - then we can all point and laugh at Kerry for being a much, much, much lamer version of Clinton.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 Let's all meet in the middle - the rumor is that Time's going to go with the story next week. If Time does publish the story - and, I must assume, we can take it as face value as they SHOULD verify the story with their sources - then we can all point and laugh at Kerry for being a much, much, much lamer version of Clinton. I heard that, too, albeit it IS just a rumor. And if so, all the better. Kerry's horrible, and even if Dean doesn't win it, I'd prefer Edwards x100 over Kerry.
Styles Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 then we can all point and laugh at Kerry for being a much, much, much lamer version of Clinton. With a thimble of his charisma that made him so popular...
kkktookmybabyaway Posted February 14, 2004 Report Posted February 14, 2004 My new standard reply, to anyone who ever says anything to me on this board, is "PROVE IT!" Prove it = the new "Deal with it!" "Source Please" > all of the aforementioned...
bobobrazil1984 Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 Turns out the whole thing was false, and Drudge was wrong. SHE NEVER EVEN WORKED/INTERNED FOR THE KERRY CAMPAIGN! And what about the tabloid quotes from the parents? Ooh he's such a scumbag and all?? Geez, *some* people are getting desperate (memo: psst, it helps quite a bit if the scandal is actually true ) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040216/D80OIHSO1.html
Guest hunger4unger Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 The Bush administration, and the right in general, are getting desperate all ready. The writing is on the wall. Kerry for president.
Guest Salacious Crumb Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 The Bush administration, and the right in general, are getting desperate all ready. The writing is on the wall. Kerry for president. You do realize that this rumor came from the Democratic side don't you? Dean or Clark campaigns are the likely suspects.
Guest MikeSC Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 The Bush administration, and the right in general, are getting desperate all ready. The writing is on the wall. Kerry for president. You do realize that this rumor came from the Democratic side don't you? Dean or Clark campaigns are the likely suspects. Shh. Don't let logic get in the way here. I mean, yes, it's obvious that the GOP wouldn't be asinine enough to leak damaging info about the Democratic front-runner in FEBRUARY --- when it would do them no good. Of course, if the press was CONSISTENT, this story would last for several more weeks. -=Mike
Hogan Made Wrestling Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 The Bush administration, and the right in general, are getting desperate all ready. The writing is on the wall. Kerry for president. You do realize that this rumor came from the Democratic side don't you? Dean or Clark campaigns are the likely suspects. I mean, yes, it's obvious that the GOP wouldn't be asinine enough to leak damaging info about the Democratic front-runner in FEBRUARY --- when it would do them no good. -=Mike On one hand, they've done it before. On the other hand, the Bush camp is smarter than the Nixon camp.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 So, Mike, Drudge was wrong. WHOA!
Firestarter Posted February 17, 2004 Report Posted February 17, 2004 Drudge was wrong Only according to unsubstantiated claims made by Kerry. I'd like him to document his movements for the past two and a half years and prove to all Americans that he never had sex with that woman. We have a right to a full investigation into the character of a man who wants to be our president...
Guest MikeSC Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 Drudge was wrong Only according to unsubstantiated claims made by Kerry. I'd like him to document his movements for the past two and a half years and prove to all Americans that he never had sex with that woman. We have a right to a full investigation into the character of a man who wants to be our president... Indeed. Since when has somebody's word (or, heck, records) been enough to say something DIDN'T happen? -=Mike
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 Drudge was wrong Only according to unsubstantiated claims made by Kerry. I'd like him to document his movements for the past two and a half years and prove to all Americans that he never had sex with that woman. We have a right to a full investigation into the character of a man who wants to be our president... Indeed. Since when has somebody's word (or, heck, records) been enough to say something DIDN'T happen? -=Mike She was being fecetious, you unbelievable moron.
Guest MikeSC Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 Drudge was wrong Only according to unsubstantiated claims made by Kerry. I'd like him to document his movements for the past two and a half years and prove to all Americans that he never had sex with that woman. We have a right to a full investigation into the character of a man who wants to be our president... Indeed. Since when has somebody's word (or, heck, records) been enough to say something DIDN'T happen? -=Mike She was being fecetious, you unbelievable moron. Well, I'm breaking this vow. She was referring to the Bush AWOL non-story that won't die. I imagine if you asked her, she'd probably say that. Call it a safe guess. BTW, you really are a blithering idiot. You should demand a refund from that college that is so horribly trying to educate you. -=Mike
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 *sigh* Forget it, seriously. Haha.
Guest hunger4unger Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 So, Drudge was a blatant lie. And I wouldn't put it passed the Bush admin to start the smear..same with the "photographs" of Kerry and Fonda. Bush is shitting it...he knows he's messed up. Still, he's made his money.
Vern Gagne Posted February 18, 2004 Report Posted February 18, 2004 Drudge's story was the Washington Press was looking into the alleged affair Kerry had. The rumor of an affair was likely started by Clark's campaign manager.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now