Guest Cerebus Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 OMGFAUX...You know the rest. A boon for Bush I guess. But it doesn't matter b/c all the other canidates are exactly alike so it won't matter which gets in right?
Guest MikeSC Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 OMGFAUX...You know the rest. A boon for Bush I guess. But it doesn't matter b/c all the other canidates are exactly alike so it won't matter which gets in right? Bah. Nader is useless and the Green Party is an openly Socialist group. -=Mike
kkktookmybabyaway Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 I like Ralph. He makes me laugh...
Henry Spencer Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader.
Guest cobainwasmurdered Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 *likes Nader but wouldn't vote for him*
Rob E Dangerously Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 I'd say that Nader will get alot less support, considering how he'd hurt the Democrats more than Bush If the Nader supporters moved to a safe state like Utah, then that wouldn't be too harmful overall.
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted February 21, 2004 Report Posted February 21, 2004 In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader. I think most school mock elections tend to vote for the third party. Our school had elections in '92 and '96 that went for Perot.
BX Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 According to Nader, he isn't running as a Green this time.
The Amazing Rando Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 I predict this campaign will be struck in the rear by another campaign, catch fire, and explode.
Vyce Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 Will this spark another round of Democrats whining that he cost them the election? Nader will have as much effect now as he did then - zilch.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader. My mock election -- back in '92 -- gave it to Perot, of which I voted for...
Rob E Dangerously Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 my school's election went for the incumbent in 92/96.. but these were 1st/5th graders
Henry Spencer Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 Our mock election in '96, when I was in third or fourth grade, went to Dole, most likely because I live in Dole's home state, which the teacher mentioned constantly, and nine year olds know jack shit about politics.
MarvinisaLunatic Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 I voted for Nader in 2000, but I don't think I'll vote for him again.
Rob E Dangerously Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 I voted for Nader in 2000, but I don't think I'll vote for him again. Thanks alot Marvin..
The Ghost of bps21 Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 I voted for him last time. I'm proud to say that since the election was held up until Florida was recounted...Nader...he hung on for a long time!
Guest Cerebus Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 It seems Democrats will be far less tolerant for a Nader campaign than 2000. Edited to add: It's official. He's running.
Spaceman Spiff Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 In the 2000 election, my middle school had a mock election, and the stoner population managed to give it to Nader. My mock election -- back in '92 -- gave it to Perot, of which I voted for... Oh yeah, top this: Jerry Brown/Howard Stern ticket got our nomination.
Jobber of the Week Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 Nader has set his own agenda back by his constant running. Why not actually do something to build up a third party from the ground floor, and run for Congress? It would actually give you strong chance to win.
Dr. Tyler; Captain America Posted February 22, 2004 Report Posted February 22, 2004 The Nader vote will likely be cancelled out by 10 Commandments Roy Moore, who looks like he's going to run a third party candidacy as well.
Dr. Tom Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 The Nader vote will likely be cancelled out by 10 Commandments Roy Moore, who looks like he's going to run a third party candidacy as well. Truly the apocalypse is at hand.
MrRant Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 *Picks up gun* So when do we start the raping, looting and pilliaging?
MrRant Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 So in about 6 months? *Puts down gun*
Guest MikeSC Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 Nader has set his own agenda back by his constant running. Why not actually do something to build up a third party from the ground floor, and run for Congress? It would actually give you strong chance to win. Thing is, he already promised Terry McAuliffe (well, according to Terry) that he won't criticize the Democratic nominee at all. So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Because he can't win the Democratic nomination? -=Mike
snuffbox Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 I really dont 'get' all the hate for third parties...it usually always comes from people with strong ties to one of the two main parties, and it really seems very un-democratic.
snuffbox Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other.
Guest MikeSC Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other. If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee. -=Mike
snuffbox Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other. If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee. -=Mike Did you watch Meet the Press tonight Mike?
Guest MikeSC Posted February 23, 2004 Report Posted February 23, 2004 So, WHY, precisely, is he running? Possibly, because he feels strongly enough about his ideals/beliefs/ideas that he will run for predident of the United States. He is a man of himself, not a polititian of one party or the other. If he feels only one side is worthy of condemnation, then he's not a third-party candidate. He's just another Democratic nominee. -=Mike Did you watch Meet the Press tonight Mike? This morning, actually, and Nader is the same boring, tedious, "Why the heck do hippies LIKE this guy" man he always was. I'm referring to McAuliffe's claim that Nader swore to him that should Nader run for office, he won't criticize a Democratic nominee. If he only criticizes one nominee, then how is he independent? -=Mike ...And many points off for that lame "Supreme Selected..." crack. Jesus, that is REAL weak
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now