jesse_ewiak 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 you wanted em.... http://www.michaelmoore.com/warroom/f911no...index.php?id=16 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justice 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Since Cerbs' isn't on, here's a good source against Farenheit 9/11. Fahrenheit 9/11: The temperature at which Michael Moore's pants burn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 19, 2004 “With information provided from the Voter News Service, NBC was the first network to project Gore the winner in Florida at 7:48 pm. At 7:50 pm ,CNN and CBS project Gore the winner in Florida as well.” By 8:02 pm , all five networks and the Associated Press had called Gore the winner in Florida. Even the VNS called Gore the winner at 7:52 pm. At 2:16 am, Fox calls Florida for Bush, NBC follows at 2:16 am. ABC is the last network to call the Florida for Bush, at 2:20 am, while AP and VNS never call Florida for Bush. CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/storie....report/cnn.pdf SMALL difference --- the erroneous call at 7:48 ACTUALLY hurts Bush. An actually CORRECT call at 2:20A doesn't really hurt anybody. A little irrelevant point. Ten minutes after the top of the hour, network excitement was again beginning to build. At 2:16 a.m., the call was made: Fox News Channel, with Bush's first cousin John Ellis running its election desk, was the first to project Florida -- and the presidency -- for the Texas governor. Within minutes, the other networks followed suit. "George Bush, Governor of Texas will become the 43rd President of the United States," CNN's Bernard Shaw announced atop a graphic montage of a smiling Bush. "At 18 minutes past two o'clock Eastern time, CNN declares that George Walker Bush has won Florida's 25 electoral votes and this should put him over the top."PBS: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/media/election...tion_night.html And this is relevant to anything? Nobody can explain how ANYBODY made a call for Gore in the first place. This isn't proof --- this is irrelevancy here. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: The man who was in charge of the decision desk at FOX on election night was Bush’s first cousin, John Ellis. “John Ellis, a first cousin of George W. Bush, ran the network's ‘decision desk’ during the 2000 election, and Fox was the first to name Bush the winner. Earlier, Ellis had made six phone calls to Cousin Bush during the vote-counting.” William O’Rourke, “Talk Radio Key to GOP Victory,” Chicago Sun-Times, December 3, 2002. And, again, how in THE HELL IS THAT RELEVANT TO ANYTHING? What, exactly, did making a call for ANYBODY several hours after the polls closed impact, well, ANYTHING? And is he attempting to argue that the other networks simply WENT ALONG WITH FOX FOR THE HELL OF IT? Is that his belief? He also misses that Fox ALSO called FL for Gore erroneously. A Fox News consultant, John Ellis, who made judgments about presidential ‘calls’ on Election Night admits he was in touch with George W. Bush and FL Gov. Jeb Bush by telephone several times during the night, but denies breaking any rules. CNN, November 14, 2000; http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/11/14/...ain249357.shtml. And what rule was broken? The wrong call was made in Gore's favor. The ONLY problem IS that Gore got the erroneous call before the polls closed. John Ellis, the Fox consultant who called Florida early for George Bush, had to stop writing about the campaign for the Boston Globe because of family ‘loyalty’ to Bush. CBS News, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/11/14/...ain249357.shtml, He called Florida "Early" --- early being several hours after the polls closed. Man, that is MUCH worse than FL being called early (and incorrectly) about 15 minutes before the polls in FL closed. November 14, 2000. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “Make sure the chairman of your campaign is also the vote countin’ woman and that her state has hired a company that’s gonna knock voters off the rolls who aren’t likely to vote for you. You can usually tell them by the color of their skin.” “The vote total was certified by Florida's secretary of state, Katherine Harris, head of the Bush campaign in Florida, on behalf of Gov. Jeb Bush, the candidate's brother.” Mark Zoller Seitz, “Bush Team Conveyed an Air of Legitimacy,” San Diego Union-Tribune, December 16, 2000. They also can't really, you know, DISPUTE anything. Jeb removed himself from the recount entirely and Harris did EVERYTHING very much by the letter of the law. The Florida Department of State awarded a $4 million contract to the Boca Raton-based Database Technologies Inc. (subsidiary of ChoicePoint). They were tasked with finding improperly registered voters in the state’s database, but mistakes were rampant. “At one point, the list included as felons 8,000 former Texas residents who had been convicted of misdemeanors.” St. Petersburg Times (Florida), December 21, 2003. Yup. And WHY? Because the Miami mayoral elections had RAMPANT problems with ex-cons voting (coverage of this led to several writers winning awards for the coverage). ALSO, EVERYBODY who was removed was given MONTHS to dispute it and fix the problem. Most did so, mind you. Also, the errors affected WHITES more than others. Shocking, I know. http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/27166.htm Database Technologies, a subsidiary of ChoicePoint, “was responsible for bungling an overhaul of Florida’s voter registration records, with the result that thousands of people, disproportionately black, were disenfranchised in the 2000 election. Had they been able to vote, they might have swung the state, and thus the presidency, for Al Gore, who lost in Florida. Oliver Burkeman, Jo Tuckman, “Firm in Florida Election Fiasco Earns Millions from Files on Foreigners,” The Guardian, May 5, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,949709,00.html. See also, Atlanta-Journal-Constitution, May 28, 2001. Completely inaccurate. ALL removed voters, according to the election commission, were given the opportunity to appeal their removal MONTHS before the election. In 1997, Rick Rozar, the late head of the company bought by ChoicePoint, donated $100,000 to the Republican National Committee. Melanie Eversley, “Atlanta-Based Company Says Errors in Felon Purge Not Its Fault,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 28, 2001. Frank Borman of Database Technologies Inc. has donated extensively to New Mexico Republicans, as well as to the Presidential campaign of George W. Bush. Opensecrets.org, “Frank Borman.” This is called a red herring. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: Gore got the most votes in 2000. [A] consortium [Tribune Co., owner of the Times; Associated Press; CNN; the New York Times; the Palm Beach Post; the St. Petersburg Times; the Wall Street Journal; and the Washington Post] hired the NORC [National Opinion Research Center, a nonpartisan research organization affiliated with the University of Chicago] to view each untallied ballot and gather information about how it was marked. The media organizations then used computers to sort and tabulate votes, based on varying scenarios that had been raised during the post-election scramble in Florida. Under any standard that tabulated all disputed votes statewide, Mr. Gore erased Mr. Bush's advantage and emerged with a tiny lead that ranged from 42 to 171 votes. Donald Lambro, “Recount Provides No Firm Answers,” Washington Times, November 12, 2001. This is, of course, total bullshit. “The review found that the result would have been different if every canvassing board in every county had examined every undervote, a situation that no election or court authority had ordered. Gore had called for such a statewide manual recount if Bush would agree, but Bush rejected the idea and there was no mechanism in place to conduct one.” Martin Merzer, “Review of Ballots Finds Bush's Win Would Have Endured Manual Recount,” Miami Herald, April 4, 2001. Also total bullshit. Really bizarre, since they did it in conjunction with USA Today, and USA Today stated the EXACT opposite. See also, the following article by one of the Washington Post journalists who ran the consortium recount. The relevant point is made in Table I of the article. http://www.aei.org/docLib/20040526_KeatingPaper.pdf Which is, of course, still unmitigated bullshit. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: Congressional Black Caucus members tried to object to the election outcome on the floor of the House; no Senator would sign the objections. “While Vice President Al Gore appeared to have accepted his fate contained in two wooden ballot boxes, Democratic members of the Congressional Black Caucus tried repeatedly to challenge the assignment of Florida's 25 electoral votes to Bush…. More than a dozen Democrats followed suit, seeking to force a debate on the validity of Florida's vote on the grounds that all votes may not have been counted and that some voters were wrongly denied the right to vote.” Susan Milligan, “It’s Really Over: Gore Bows Out Gracefully,” Boston Globe, January 7, 2001. The Congressional Black Caucus effort failed for “lack of the necessary signature by any senator.” Sen. Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) had previously advised Democratic senators not to cooperate. ‘They did not.’” Robert Novak, “Sweeney Link Won't Help Chao,” Chicago Sun-Times, January 14, 2001. This is relevant in what way to the way of the world? FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “On the day George W. Bush was inaugurated, tens of thousands of Americans poured into the streets of D.C. They pelted Bush’s limo with eggs.” “Shouting slogans like ‘Hail to the Thief’ and ‘Selected, Not Elected,’ tens of thousands of protesters descended on George W. Bush's inaugural parade route yesterday to proclaim that he and Vice President Dick Cheney had ‘stolen’ the election.” Michael Kranish and Sue Kirchhoff, “Thousands Protest ‘Stolen’ Election,” Boston Globe, January 21, 2001. WHAT? SOME VOTERS PROTESTED A PRESIDENT? GET THE FUCK OUTTA TOWN! “Scuffles erupted between radicals and riot police while an egg struck the bullet-proof presidential limousine as it carried Mr. Bush and wife Laura to the White House.” Damon Johnston, “Bush Pledges Justice as Critics Throw Eggs,” The Advertisers, January 22, 2001. See also film footage. And this proves Moore's film how? FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “The inauguration parade was brought to a halt and the traditional walk to the White House was scrapped.” Bush made one concession to the weather -- or to security concerns: He stayed in his limousine nearly the entire length of the mile-long inaugural parade, waving through a slightly foggy window. He got out to walk only for a brief distance when his motorcade reached the VIP grandstands in front of the Treasury Department and the White House. Doyle McManus, et al., “Bush Vows to Bring Nation Together,” Los Angeles Times, January, 21, 2001. Bush's limo, which traveled most of the route at a slow walking pace, stopped dead just before it reached the corner of 14th St. and Pennsylvania Ave., where most of the protesters had congregated. Then it sped up dramatically, and Secret Service agents protecting the car on foot had to follow at a full run. When they reached a section of the parade route where the sidewalks were restricted to official ticketholders, Bush and his wife, Laura, who wore a flattering electric turquoise suit, got out of the limo to walk and greet supporters. Helen Kennedy, “Bush Pledges a United US,” New York Daily News, January 21, 2001. WHAT? You mean irrational hatred of Bush occurred BEFORE Iraq? FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “For the next eight months, it didn’t get any better for George W. Bush.” In a poll conducted September 5 to September 9, 2001, Investor’s Business Daily and the Christian Science Monitor showed President Bush’s approval rating at 45%, down from 52% in May ( Investor’s Business Daily/Christian Science Monitor Poll, conducted by TIPP, 9/5 to 9/9, 2001). Zogby’s polling had Bush at 47% in late July 2001, down from 57% in February (Zogby, 7/26 to 7/29, 2001). Or, roughly, what ALL Presidents get after the honeymoon ends. In June 2001, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed President Bush's approval rating at 50 percent, which was the lowest presidential approval rating in five years. Richard L. Berke, “G.O.P. Defends Bush in Face of Dip in Poll Ratings,” The New York Times, June 29 2001 Of course, the last time a President was elected for his first term was EIGHT years earlier --- so it's not terribly relevant. On July 26, 2001, in an article entitled “Bush Lacks the Ability To Force Action on Hill,” Dana Milbank of the Washington Post wrote, “ It may be premature to conclude that Bush has lost control of his agenda, but lawmakers and strategists in both parties said that Bush's next year is much more likely to look like the fractious month of July than like the orderly march toward Bush's tax cut this spring.… The troubles began, of course, with Vermont Sen. James M. Jeffords' departure from the GOP, giving control of the Senate to the Democrats. But the problems are nearly as bad in the House, where moderates who supported Bush's tax cut are proving recalcitrant on other issues. They rebelled against GOP leaders on campaign finance reform and held up Bush's "faith-based" legislation over concerns about discrimination. Next week, they're likely to oppose Bush's proposal to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.” Dana needs to eventually learn that he's supposed to be a journalist and not an op-ed writer. California energy crisis also took a toll on Bush’s approval ratings. Due to rolling blackouts and rising utility bills Bush’s ratings took a toll among Californians. The poll showed that almost as many Californians disapproved of the President’s job as approved of it with an approve/disapprove of 42/40. “Calif. Governor Says He'll Sue to Force Government Action,” The Houston Chronicle, May 30, 2001. Ironic, since the problems started before Bush took office. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “In his first eight months in office before September 11, George W. Bush was on vacation, according to the Washington Post, forty-two percent of the time.” “News coverage has pointedly stressed that W.'s month-long stay at his ranch in Crawford is the longest presidential vacation in 32 years. Washington Post supercomputers calculated that if you add up all his weekends at Camp David, layovers at Kennebunkport and assorted to-ing and fro-ing, W. will have spent 42 percent of his presidency ‘at vacation spots or en route.’” Charles Krauthammer, “A Vacation Bush Deserves,” The Washington Post, August 10, 2001. AND? FAHRENHEIT 9/11: Bush relaxes at Camp David, Kennebunkport and his ranch in Crawford Texas. As of April 2004, President Bush had made 33 trips to Crawford during his presidency, bringing his total to more than 230 days at the ranch in just over three years. “Add his 78 trips to Camp David and five to his family’s compound at Kennebunkport, Maine, and Bush has spent all or part of 500 days – or about 40 percent of his presidency – at one of these his three retreats.” “Bush Retreats to a Favorite Getaway: Crawford ranch,” Houston Chronicle, April 11, 2004. OOOOOOH! FAHRENHEIT 9/11: On Sept. 10, 2001 , Bush joined his brother in Florida where he slept the night in “a bed made of fine French linens.” Bush has not been bashful about visiting Florida, ground zero in the vote-recount battle that followed last year's election. On this trip, he was spending a good deal of time with his brother, Gov. Jeb Bush. " President to Push Congress on Education in Fourth Florida Visit,” Associated Press, September 10, 2001; See also, CNN Inside Politics, September 10, 2001. So, he's lazy --- but he's not supposed to visit states, either. Two individuals prepared the president’s room “and made the bed with some of the family's fine French linens.” Tom Bayles, “The Day Before Everything Changed, President Bush Touched Locals' Lives,” Sarasota Herald-Tribune, September 10, 2002. Irrelevancy, thy name is Moore. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “As the attack took place, Mr. Bush was on his way to an elementary school in Florida . When informed of the first plane hitting the World Trade Center, where terrorists had struck just eight years prior, Bush just decided to go ahead with his photo opportunity.” NOTE: It should be emphasized that at the time Bush was notified of the first plane attack, he (unlike the rest of America) was already aware that Osama bin Laden was planning to attack America by hijacking airplanes, per the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief (PDB). He was also aware, of course, that the World Trade Center had been historically a target for terrorist attacks. He nonetheless went ahead with this photo opportunity in a school full of children. Yes, Bush knew EXACTLY what was happening. Yup. Because that briefing was DAMNED clear and precise. “Mr. Bush arrived at the school, just before 9 am, expecting to be met by its motherly principal, Gwen Rigell. Instead he was pulled sharply aside by the familiar, bulky figure of 51-year-old Karl Rove, a veteran political fixer and trusted aide of both Mr. Bush and his father, George Sr. Mr. Rove, a fellow Texan with an expansive manner and a colorful turn of phrase, told the President that a large commercial airliner (American Flight 11) had crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Centre . Mr. Bush clenched his teeth, lowered his bottom lip and said something inaudible. Then he went into the school.” William Langley, “Revealed: What Really Went on During Bush’s ‘Missing Hours,’” The Telegraph, December 16, 2001. And? August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief (PDB), “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike Inside US”: “Al-Qa'ida members -- including some who are US citizens -- have resided in or traveled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure that could aid attacks… FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.” August 6, 2001, Bin Ladin Determined to Strike Inside US, http://www.cnn.com/2004/images/04/10/whitehouse.pdf Wow, THAT is clear and concise. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “When the second plane hit the tower, his chief of staff entered the classroom and told Mr. Bush the nation is under attack.” “At 9:05 a.m., the White House chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., stepped into the classroom and whispered into the president's right ear, ‘A second plane hit the other tower, and America's under attack.’” David E. Sanger and Don Van Natta Jr., “After The Attacks: The Events; In Four Days, A National Crisis Changes Bush's Presidency,” The New York Times, September 16, 2001. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “Mr. Bush just sat there and continued to read My Pet Goat.” “It was while attending a second-grade reading class at Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla., to promote his education reforms that President Bush learned America was under attack. In the presence of her VIP guest, teacher Sandra Kay Daniels, 45, conducted the day's lesson, which centered on a story about a pet goat.” “9/11: A Year After,” Los Angeles Times, September 11, 2002. President Bush listened to 18 Booker Elementary School second-graders read a story about a girl's pet goat Tuesday before he spoke briefly and somberly about the terrorist attacks. “Bush hears of attack while visiting Booker,” Sarasota Herald-Tribune, September 12, 2001. See also film footage. FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “Nearly seven minutes passed with nobody doing anything.” “[H]e lingered in the room for another six minutes [after being informed of the second plane]… [At] 9:12, he abruptly retreated, speaking to Mr. Cheney and New York officials.” David E. Sanger and Don Van Natta Jr., “After The Attacks: The Events;In Four Days, A National Crisis Changes Bush's Presidency,” The New York Times, September 16, 2001 . “Mr. Bush remained in the elementary school for nearly a half an hour after Andy Card whispered in his ear.” Michael Kranish, “Bush: US To Hunt Down Attackers,” Boston Globe, September 11, 2001. And the principal said he did the right thing. Moore doesn't really make, you know, POINTS. “A senior delegation from the Taleban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan. A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taleban were expected to spend several days at the company's headquarters in Sugarland, Texas.” “Taleban in Texas for talks on Gas Pipeline,” BBC News, December 4, 1997 (Sugarland is 22 miles outside Houston.) And how much power does a governor have over who visits his state? Why, none. HOWEVER, the President DOES have some. Just sayin'. BTW, Bush backed the Enron plan, not the Unocal plan. Unocal also denounced any plans in Afghanistan. Man, he is laden with non-points and red herrings. It's amazing how tedious a person he is. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 So....was he supposed to jump out of his seat and scream "OH MY GOD!" when his aide whispered into his ear? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vyce 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 So....was he supposed to jump out of his seat and scream "OH MY GOD!" when his aide whispered into his ear? Aren't you new to this board? It was decided a few weeks ago, by some members here, that Bush should have jumped out of his seat immediately, and used his super powers to personally fly into the air and stop the remaining planes. AND to capture Osama Bin Laden that very same day, possibly by using his super heat-vision, or perhaps his super-cold breath. He didn't do that though, which is why hate him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 I thought we hated him for being the mastermind behnd the attacks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Oh, I know he didn't plan 9/11, but I am certain he had every intention of going to war with Iraq regardless of whether 9/11 happened or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 19, 2004 I thought we hated him for being the mastermind behnd the attacks. We hate him because, unlike Kerry, he didn't grab a gun and start firing at planes. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gert T 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Mike I gotta admit, I don't agree with you on everything, but I do admire that you do your homework, and stand up for your stances. Although crediting and discrediting this movie seems just back and forth banter. However, I guess since Michael Moore trys to portray this as documentary it is allowed to dig deeper into points made. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 SMALL difference --- the erroneous call at 7:48 ACTUALLY hurts Bush. An actually CORRECT call at 2:20A doesn't really hurt anybody. A little irrelevant point. You almost say this like Bush got the most votes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 So....was he supposed to jump out of his seat and scream "OH MY GOD!" when his aide whispered into his ear? Aren't you new to this board? It was decided a few weeks ago, by some members here, that Bush should have jumped out of his seat immediately, and used his super powers to personally fly into the air and stop the remaining planes. AND to capture Osama Bin Laden that very same day, possibly by using his super heat-vision, or perhaps his super-cold breath. He didn't do that though, which is why hate him. Damn Straight! How is this too much to ask huh? Tell me how! I bet you Al Gore would have sensed them coming and stopped them in mid-flight. Damn that Bush, damn him to hell! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Can anyone remind me who these posters are? Because I think it was only the finge crowd, ex. Hunger4Unger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 So....was he supposed to jump out of his seat and scream "OH MY GOD!" when his aide whispered into his ear? Aren't you new to this board? It was decided a few weeks ago, by some members here, that Bush should have jumped out of his seat immediately, and used his super powers to personally fly into the air and stop the remaining planes. AND to capture Osama Bin Laden that very same day, possibly by using his super heat-vision, or perhaps his super-cold breath. He didn't do that though, which is why hate him. Bush: I have to make a phone call. I'll be back........ Aide: Sir I have a cell phone....... Bush: I like phone booths! Call me old fashioned! *Bush rushes to the nearest phone booth where he removes his shirt to reveal a red and yellow S. Bush completely changes with nobody on the street noticing him. Then as Super Man he leaps to save the day.* That's what should've happened........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 and the see-saw battle continues....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Stop being ridiculous. Bush had every fucking reason in the world to leave when he heard the news, but he stayed behind in order to "not scare the children"!?!? What sort of fucking excuse is this shit? Any sense of calm those children had was due to die in short order. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ArchoanJB Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Everyone read Michael Moore is a fat stupid white man...it'll explain soooooo much about Michael Moore's sleeze, too lazy to type it all out, but damn is he a giant sleezebag Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ArchoanJB Report post Posted July 19, 2004 BX - you know as well as I do if Bush got immediately up Moore would've showed it and said, "Bush was OFF TO ACTION, Quick to attack, Not actaully thinking." Then he would show a pic of a nuclear bomb exploding from 1955. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BX 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Stupid bullshit. Stupid, stupid stupid bullshit. Bush should have excused himself, apologized for cutting it short, and left to become informed of the situation from his advisors (who we know were there) in case his authorization was needed to... oh, I dunno, shoot down a plane or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 On a certain News Watch program on a certain Cable News Channel that makes everyone laugh out loud in a certain Year they mentioned this week that Mikey used footage of one soldier's death in his comedy, err, documentary, and the family of this soldier threw a stink about it. Ol' fattie didn't ask for the family's permission or anything -- you think he would, but I guess when he was going to it was last call at Old Country Buffet or something... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ArchoanJB Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Bush sat there for 7 whole minutes..7 WHOLE MINUTES. Let's impeach the fucker for sitting there for 7 minutes. I don't get why this is even a point against him in this damn thing. He was in front of a large group of kids and I don't know if this is true and neither do you, but prob. didn't wanna look bad for leaving the kids as soon as he got there. This was before the severity of it was truly known as well. 7 FUCKING MINUTES. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 It's Bullshit!! Lies! This point doesn't matter!!! Hey, the guy backed his movie up with sources. Get over it Mike. The movie is out. The movie will make over a 100 mil. There isn't a fucking thing you can do about it. So keep yelling at the void. Your boy got caught with his own words and hung HIMSELF! Moore just pointed everyone in the direction to see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stephen Joseph 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 SMALL difference --- the erroneous call at 7:48 ACTUALLY hurts Bush. An actually CORRECT call at 2:20A doesn't really hurt anybody. A little irrelevant point. You almost say this like Bush got the most votes. And what Arch said. Please people, like anyone else would've done anything differently. Hi. Justice department here again. Bush and Gore were a statistical tie. I've said that HOW many times? You can measure and remeasure, but any measurement will have error and bias. And finally, in the end, the SUPREME COURT of the US issued the right opinion. See my thread on the CONCURRING OPINION and why what the florida supreme court did was friggin unconstitutional. God, its been 4 years. Let it go. No one deserves to be president if they can't carry their home state. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 Hi. Justice department here again. Seriously, no one cares. You can spout off your credentials until the next full moon, and we still won't give a shit. Sorry for that aside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 I just find it funny that when Steve talks about economics (which is what he does for a living, allegedly) some people disregard his info anyway. That would be like someone disregarding what I say in the area of... of... of... um, kitties?... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 That's because he repeats the same tripe every time (quick, someone do a search on how many times he's said "Laffer Curve") and backs it up with the same "NO, TRUST ME, I'M AN ECONOMIST!!!!" Thanks, bud! We can read books just fine ourselves! It's the same as if I were a politician and I spouted off "NO, TRUST ME, I'M A POLITICIAN... I UNDERSTAND ELECTORAL POLITICS!!!" It's crass and self-important garbage. No one gives a shit if you're Milton Friedman or fucking Andy Kaufman; we're asking for your opinions here, not your insistance that you're an "expert". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dangerous A 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 I find the people who argue about Bush sitting for 7 minutes reading to kids bit hilarious. It's subjective as to how he should've reacted. This is something both sides need to let go. You could go back and put a variety of politicians in the same situation and they all would probrably react differently and in the eyes of their opponents, it would be wrong. Folks, Let the "Bush did nothing for 7 minutes" argument the fuck go. Anyone still arguing this particular point is a retard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 19, 2004 SMALL difference --- the erroneous call at 7:48 ACTUALLY hurts Bush. An actually CORRECT call at 2:20A doesn't really hurt anybody. A little irrelevant point. You almost say this like Bush got the most votes. Well, seeing as how he did, it's irrelevant. They made the correct call --- and then rescinded the correct call even later. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 I just find it funny that when Steve talks about economics (which is what he does for a living, allegedly) some people disregard his info anyway. That would be like someone disregarding what I say in the area of... of... of... um, kitties?... I only keep you around because you make me laugh, kkk.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted July 19, 2004 It's Bullshit!! Yes, it is. Lies! Yup. This point doesn't matter!!! Correct again. Hey, the guy backed his movie up with sources. And the movie is still easily shredded by anybody who puts forth a modicum of effort. Get over it Mike. The movie is out. Yup. DL'd it myself. The movie will make over a 100 mil. Good chance of that. There isn't a fucking thing you can do about it. Probably not. Then again, not much you can do, either. So keep yelling at the void. Thanks. I will. Your boy got caught with his own words and hung HIMSELF! Except Moore's "sources" are so ridiculous and pointless it defies logic. But, hey, if you find this film intellectually deep and convincing, I might suggest you stick to other boards. Moore just pointed everyone in the direction to see it. And I simply discredited him. Really wasn't hard, either. Weird, huh? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted July 19, 2004 What I found more funny about the "7 minutes" was when they would cut the camera to Ari Flescier(sp?) and he had this, "wtf, get the hell up, we gotta go" look on his face.......but really, this 7 minutes debate has been done to death, it is a moot point as in retrospect, nothing different would happened had Bush got up within 5, 10, 30 seconds rather then 7 minutes. There are a lot more important issues to worry about concering Bush and the War. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites