Guest DaGoodz Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 25. Motorhead 24. Rage Against The Machine 23. Emperor 22. Marilyn Manson 21. Def Leppard 20. Slipknot 19. Soundgarden 18. Black Flag 17. Napalm Death 16. Fugazi 15. Nine Inch Nails 14. Blink 182 13. Judas Priest 12. Korn 11. Bon Jovi 10. Nirvana 9. Pantera 8. Faith No More 7. Slayer 6. Ozzy Osbourne 5. Green Day 4. AC/DC 3. Metallica 2. Guns'n'Roses 1. Iron Maiden Credit: Kerrang! Whaddya think?
PLAGIARISM! Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Well it's er..specialist.. Within that sphere I think solo Ozzy might be a little high, his act took a lot from Alice Cooper and much of his goodness was due to being able to get the best session men.
daileyxplanet Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 I completely discredit it simply because U2 is no where to be found, and they've been active the entire timespan.
PLAGIARISM! Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Yeah, but I'm making allowances for this list being from Kerrang! because all lists are a waste of time outside their inevitably specialist little world.
C Dubya 04 Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 I might give this list a bit of credit if they specifically said metal/hard rock bands. And if it didn't have Blink 182 on it. Oh, and don't hate on Bon Jovi.
Black Lushus Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 wait a tic... Soundgarden is on this list but Alice In Chains and Pearl Jam are not on this list? rubbish...
Dobbs 3K Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 As far as strictly hard rock/metal bands, that list might suffice. If they truly mean simply "top 25 most important rock bands", then it's completely wrong. Like was mentioned, U2 should be somewhere if that's the case, as well as the Police, and probably a few New Wave bands as well. The Pixies should probably be there, as they influenced probably a quarter or even a third of the bands on that list.
pochorenella Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 wait a tic... Soundgarden is on this list but Alice In Chains and Pearl Jam are not on this list? rubbish... I immediately noticed that too. I would've said that no U2 on the list means it's more of a hard rock list (it's Kerrang! after all) but then I see fricking Blink 182 listed and I scratch my head... I must say I've never heard Black Flag, Fugazi, Napalm Death, or Emperor.
Dobbs 3K Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Black Flag and Fugazi were both hardcore, post-punk bands. Black Flag is probably the more famous, since Henry Rollins was their lead singer for a while. Fugazi kind of evolved from another band called Minor Threat, which was sort of the first "straight edge" band. I couldn't tell you about the other two.
C Dubya 04 Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Fugazi were a pretty important band as far as influence goes. They really were the start of the DIY stuff and helped indie labels a ton. Despite plenty of offers, they never signed with a major label. Made pretty good music along the way too.
The Metal Maniac Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Yeah, within the "rules" of this list, Maiden is an easy number one. They've been pretty consistently one of the best metal bands there is since 1980, are still putting out great albums, and they influenced a *lot* of other bands within their genre. My main complaint is that Motorhead should be higher.
Special K Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Even within the confines of whatever they're trying to do, Korn shouldn't be above Nine Inch Nails. No Sonic Youth, Pixies, Pearl Jam or Smashing Pumpkins? Fucking rubbish. Blink 182 ahead of Fugazi makes me want to puke. Green Day was more important than Nirvana? This list fucking sucks dick.
Edwin MacPhisto Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Kerrang's a terrible publication, and this is the kind of drivel that keeps them so.
CanadianGuitarist Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 I don't think I have a problem with Maiden as #1. I'd have liked to have seen AcDc on there. Fuck me, but Eminem prolly should have made an appearance. Also, no U2? Or Public Enemy? Or PEarl Jam? Why is Greenday so high? They were a fairly popular band until American Idiot took off, and Bush hating is essentially a fad anyway. And this one might have to be chalked up to ignorance, but why is Faith No More ahead of Nirvana?
Guest JustPassinBy Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Nirvana's gotta be top 5. They essentially created a whole genre of rock. Where would Alternative Rock be without them? Nirvana was so great, that I still to this day can put in their unplugged and it would sound cutting edge. I agree with Green Day bc without Green Day, there's no Blink 182, or all the other punk rock bands that got famous. Green Day actually was really popular in 1994. They didnt just recently become big. They deserve a place on the list, but not in front of Nirvana. Where's Smashing Pumpkins? Where's Red Hot Chili Peppers? Where's Radiohead? Why the need to have Slayer, Pantera, and Marilyn Manson all on one list?
The Metal Maniac Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Cuz it's from a magazine which focuses on rock/metal?
Anorak Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 wait a tic... Soundgarden is on this list but Alice In Chains and Pearl Jam are not on this list? rubbish... Pearl Jam? They sure are. Even within the confines of whatever they're trying to do, Korn shouldn't be above Nine Inch Nails. Good point. I'm not a fan but NIN would possibly be pushing top 5 if this list made any kind of sense. No Sonic Youth, Pixies, Pearl Jam or Smashing Pumpkins? Fucking rubbish. Sonic Youth and Pixies just aren't the kind of bands that Kerrang covers. Yeah, I know. Too indie I think.
Special K Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 I think they chose the worst possible name for the list. I don't even really hate Korn or Blink 182 that much, but to call them important is laughable. They became popular based on existing trends, and didn't make any contributions to music in any way possible. And hey? What has seven arms and sucks? Def Leppard
2GOLD Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 There isn't any reality where Korn ahead of Judas Priest makes one bit of sense.
Guest wahoo Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 The key word is important. It doesn't say "most talented" or whatever. Still, the list is strange any way you look at it. Def Leppard still put out major label albums and sell out concerts in arenas. You can write a book on why they are important. One of five bands to have two albums sell over 10 million each. One of few to chart 7 hit singles from one album. Sold more albums in the 80s than any other rock band. wikipedia: "Prior to Pyromania, hard rock was restricted to a mostly male following with limited to no mainstream success. When the five young, photogenic members of Def Leppard arrived on MTV, the image added a large female following to the audience, but the music remained loyal to the influences of hard rock and glam metal with a radio-friendly edge, courtesy of Mutt Lange. It wasn't long before other young bands started also hitting MTV (Motley Crue, Quiet Riot, Ratt). While the look was more outrageous (notably the hair) in some cases, the music indisputably followed Leppard's lead, and was now crossing over onto the pop charts with greater frequency and success." Bon Jovi have done what few have or ever will. Over 100 million albums sold. Still putting out albums that go platinum and still able to sell out 50,000 seat stadiums. Meanwhile most of the bands that have come out in the last ten years can't play places that hold over 3,000.
2GOLD Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Korn wasn't important for even a footnote. This word is getting thrown around to way too many bands. Korn wasn't important, they were just another generic rock band with crap lyrics and one of the worse lead singers in music history. I guess they were important to 16 yr old angry kids who liked to pretend they beat people up in school and were abused by their parents.
Guest wahoo Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Maybe your local bar band is better than Korn, but that doesn't make them important. Korn took their first album platinum with no radio play and a few showings on Headbanger's Ball. Then after people like Alanis Morissette had been dominating "alternative" radio, Korn broke huge into that, bringing heavy music to a whole new group of fans. A lot of these fans branched out and discovered Black Sabbath, Metallica and more extreme metal groups, but it was Korn that first turned them on to something heavy metal related. They were the first big downtuned "nu metal" band. If there was no Korn there would have been no Limp Bizkit, Staind, etc.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now