Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

TW LW Title (click to view) Studio Weekend Gross % Change Theater Count / Change Average Total Gross Budget* Week #

1 N Bangkok Dangerous LGF $7,800,000 - 2,650 - $2,943 $7,800,000 $45 1

2 1 Tropic Thunder P/DW $7,500,000 -34.9% 3,446 -27 $2,176 $96,811,000 $92 4

3 4 The House Bunny Sony $5,900,000 -29.1% 2,736 +22 $2,156 $36,999,000 $25 3

4 3 The Dark Knight WB $5,715,000 -33.7% 2,575 -175 $2,219 $512,198,000 $185 8

5 5 Traitor Over. $4,660,000 -40.8% 2,108 +54 $2,210 $17,652,000 $22 2

6 2 Babylon A.D. Fox $4,000,000 -57.8% 3,425 +35 $1,167 $17,198,000 $70 2

7 6 Death Race Uni. $3,595,000 -43.0% 2,586 +49 $1,390 $29,793,000 $45 3

8 7 Disaster Movie LGF $3,300,000 -43.5% 2,642 - $1,249 $10,871,000 $20 2

9 8 Mamma Mia! Uni. $2,713,000 -35.6% 1,904 -64 $1,424 $136,297,000 $52 8

10 9 Pineapple Express Sony $2,400,000 -32.1% 1,802 -245 $1,331 $84,158,000 $27 5

11 10 Vicky Cristina Barcelona MGM/W $2,202,000 -21.8% 718 +26 $3,066 $16,113,000 - 4

12 11 Mirrors Fox $1,825,000 -33.7% 1,559 -261 $1,170 $27,769,000 - 4

 

Posted
2005 was a good year for Cage with The Weather Man and Lord Of War both being damn good. He just hasn't made anything I've liked since then.

 

Since both movies tanked, I wouldn't call it a good year for him.

Posted

Nicholas Cage is going to be in in Mark Millar's "Kick Ass" directed by Matthew Vaughan. Vaughan btw is the director of Layer Cake and Stardust (ridiculously underrated movie by the way), and the guy who was going to do X-Men 3 until he backed out because he thought the script sucked (though he put it much more politely than that). As you might gather, I'm a Vaughan fan. But I'm straying from my original point, which is Cage is going to be in the movie, and it might be good. So maybe he'll have a movie that doesn't suck. We can hope.

Posted

The Wicker Man with Cage is seriously one of the worst movies ever made. It's even worse once you actually watch the original.

 

Another amusing moment in that one was Cage's bizarre dream and then waking up to say "GOD DAMMIT!"

Posted

I don't buy The Wicker Man being one of the worst movies ever made. The first hour or so is just plain boring but not spectacularly bad and the last half hour is spectacularly bad but wildly entertaining. Bad movie but nowhere near one of the worst.

 

And I might catch some flak for it but it's not like The Wicker Man was one of those untouchable movies that just shouldn't have been remade. They just really, really bungled it with the incredibly unneccessary alterations to the plot.

 

Hey, apparently they're planning a sequel to the original with Christopher Lee and Britt Ecklund returning. Odd. What decades old movie will they do an unneccessary sequel to next?

Posted
I don't buy The Wicker Man being one of the worst movies ever made. The first hour or so is just plain boring but not spectacularly bad and the last half hour is spectacularly bad but wildly entertaining. Bad movie but nowhere near one of the worst.

 

And I might catch some flak for it but it's not like The Wicker Man was one of those untouchable movies that just shouldn't have been remade. They just really, really bungled it with the incredibly unneccessary alterations to the plot.

 

Hey, apparently they're planning a sequel to the original with Christopher Lee and Britt Ecklund returning. Odd. What decades old movie will they do an unneccessary sequel to next?

 

Back To The Future.

 

Posted

Kamala, I agree with your assessment that the newer Wicker Man is really dull for the first half and then builds to a riotously bad crescendo. I wish the whole movie had been so over the top. That said, it's still one of the worst major studio films I've ever seen. I say that because the director of the newer version literally missed the entire point of the original on every possible level.

 

As far as Wicker Man being untouchable, it depends. Talk to someone British and they'll be deeply offended at it being remade. It's a mega classic there, not so much in the USA.

Posted

My view to remakes is pretty similar to Milkhawk's. I just find it hard to get up in arms about them anymore. As bad as they might be, they don't really ruin the appeal of the original. Obviously, there are some movies that absolutely under no circumstances should be remade but those are really a small percentage. And really, if you don't like the idea of someone remaking one of your favorites, then just don't watch it.

 

*rant over*

 

Hey bob, how's Righteous Kill projected to do? DeNiro and Pacino aren't really box office draws on their own (were they ever really?) but I wonder what the appeal is of seeing them together for more than a couple of scenes. I'm also a bit wary of it given its release date.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...