ChrisMWaters Posted October 18, 2008 Report Posted October 18, 2008 With the recent release of the Summerslam DVD box set (and me STILL hoping for a Survivor Series one soon), there's something I've been wondering. For Survivor Series and Summerslam, which were the first of either event that was on DVD? I already know that WrestleMania XV and Royal Rumble 2000 were the first of those respective events on DVD. Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania"
ChrisMWaters Posted October 18, 2008 Author Report Posted October 18, 2008 Double post there. Don't know what happened.
Aero Posted October 18, 2008 Report Posted October 18, 2008 Summerslam 1999 and Survivor Series 2000 were the first DVDs for each event.
haws bah gawd Posted October 18, 2008 Report Posted October 18, 2008 Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Exactly the reason I waited for eternity until I came across an original Wrestlemania X-Seven on DVD. I could have picked up one of the History of Wrestlemania DVD sets, but once the Attitude era kicks in, you have blurry WWF logo's everywhere. Try as I might, I can't help but be a little distracted by blurry turnbuckles, logos, tshirts, and belts. Personally, I always found it a little dumb that only the scratch-style WWF logo had to be blurred per the Wildlife Fund lawsuit.
ChrisMWaters Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Posted October 19, 2008 Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Exactly the reason I waited for eternity until I came across an original Wrestlemania X-Seven on DVD. I could have picked up one of the History of Wrestlemania DVD sets, but once the Attitude era kicks in, you have blurry WWF logo's everywhere. Try as I might, I can't help but be a little distracted by blurry turnbuckles, logos, tshirts, and belts. Personally, I always found it a little dumb that only the scratch-style WWF logo had to be blurred per the Wildlife Fund lawsuit. Well, they also blur out when you have the letters WWF like how I just typed it on a screen. As evidenced in the DVD of the 1991 Royal Rumble after Sgt. Slaughter wins the title.
haws bah gawd Posted October 19, 2008 Report Posted October 19, 2008 Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Exactly the reason I waited for eternity until I came across an original Wrestlemania X-Seven on DVD. I could have picked up one of the History of Wrestlemania DVD sets, but once the Attitude era kicks in, you have blurry WWF logo's everywhere. Try as I might, I can't help but be a little distracted by blurry turnbuckles, logos, tshirts, and belts. Personally, I always found it a little dumb that only the scratch-style WWF logo had to be blurred per the Wildlife Fund lawsuit. Well, they also blur out when you have the letters WWF like how I just typed it on a screen. As evidenced in the DVD of the 1991 Royal Rumble after Sgt. Slaughter wins the title. Hmmm, that's interesting. I haven't noticed them editing-out the old block-style logo.
ChrisMWaters Posted October 19, 2008 Author Report Posted October 19, 2008 Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Exactly the reason I waited for eternity until I came across an original Wrestlemania X-Seven on DVD. I could have picked up one of the History of Wrestlemania DVD sets, but once the Attitude era kicks in, you have blurry WWF logo's everywhere. Try as I might, I can't help but be a little distracted by blurry turnbuckles, logos, tshirts, and belts. Personally, I always found it a little dumb that only the scratch-style WWF logo had to be blurred per the Wildlife Fund lawsuit. Well, they also blur out when you have the letters WWF like how I just typed it on a screen. As evidenced in the DVD of the 1991 Royal Rumble after Sgt. Slaughter wins the title. Hmmm, that's interesting. I haven't noticed them editing-out the old block-style logo. They don't edit out the block logo. They just edit out when it's typed out WWF like how I just typed it out.
haws bah gawd Posted October 19, 2008 Report Posted October 19, 2008 Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Exactly the reason I waited for eternity until I came across an original Wrestlemania X-Seven on DVD. I could have picked up one of the History of Wrestlemania DVD sets, but once the Attitude era kicks in, you have blurry WWF logo's everywhere. Try as I might, I can't help but be a little distracted by blurry turnbuckles, logos, tshirts, and belts. Personally, I always found it a little dumb that only the scratch-style WWF logo had to be blurred per the Wildlife Fund lawsuit. Well, they also blur out when you have the letters WWF like how I just typed it on a screen. As evidenced in the DVD of the 1991 Royal Rumble after Sgt. Slaughter wins the title. Hmmm, that's interesting. I haven't noticed them editing-out the old block-style logo. They don't edit out the block logo. They just edit out when it's typed out WWF like how I just typed it out. Ah, I see. That's still kind of silly.
DCH Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 Is the word WWF or the words World Wrestling Federation bleeped when they say it in the DVDs?
ChrisMWaters Posted October 20, 2008 Author Report Posted October 20, 2008 Is the word WWF or the words World Wrestling Federation bleeped when they say it in the DVDs? World Wrestling Federation is never bleeped. WWF they either cut out the sentence that uses WWF or they just cut off the F from it, like... "Anything can happen in the WW" and then they START to say F, but it's either cut completely or they just catch the first part of the F.
DCH Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 That's just retarded. Did the world wildlife fund really have to force them to do this?
ChrisMWaters Posted October 20, 2008 Author Report Posted October 20, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wrestli...g_Entertainment or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wildlif...viation_dispute More information about the WWF/WWE problems.
cabbageboy Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 I don't see how a court could actually make WWE blur logos and do all this crazy crap. It actively hurts their DVD product. Why doesn't WWE simply put a disclaimer at the beginning of each disc saying "From 1979 to 2002 we were known as the WWF, which has nothing to do with the World Wildlife Fund." I can get why they now have to be WWE, but there's no way if I'm Vince I'd ruin my tape library to satisfy these assholes.
DrVenkman PhD Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 Foley and Cole seemed to find a loophole on 24/7 commentary where if they say "The old" you can say "WWF", but that doesn't help any old commentary out.
Spaceman Spiff Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 I can get why they now have to be WWE, but there's no way if I'm Vince I'd ruin my tape library to satisfy these assholes. Yeah, because ignoring the 1st court ruling worked out so well for Vince, why not do it again, right?
JPopStarKami Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 I can get why they now have to be WWE, but there's no way if I'm Vince I'd ruin my tape library to satisfy these assholes. Yeah, because ignoring the 1st court ruling worked out so well for Vince, why not do it again, right? Surely they could have come to some agreement that didn't involve blurring everything out.
Spaceman Spiff Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 Maybe if Vince didn't willfully ignore the 1st ruling for years, he might have had some room to negotiate.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 Maybe if Vince didn't willfully ignore the 1st ruling for years, he might have had some room to negotiate. This or at least make the adjustments way back then, so that there's no blurring to be had.
Thanks for the Fish Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 I think the blurring is absolutely ridiculous, but it's VKM's fault. I can't stand watching old matches with the blur. Vince should have made a huge donation to World Wildlife Fund that would have allowed them to not have to blur all the damn footage.
JN News Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 With the recent release of the Summerslam DVD box set (and me STILL hoping for a Survivor Series one soon), there's something I've been wondering. For Survivor Series and Summerslam, which were the first of either event that was on DVD? I already know that WrestleMania XV and Royal Rumble 2000 were the first of those respective events on DVD. Reason I'm asking is because, if I can, I'm going to try to get the old WWF logos of those events, so I don't have to worry too much about "Bluramania" Vince's idiocy towards the "Panda People" is just ONE of the reasons why I just flat-out despise his arrogant ass.
bob_barron Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 Shut up, JN News. The blurring is a little annoying, but I don't see how it takes away the enjoyment of a match unless you're really anal. It'd be great if everything could be as it was, but it can't be, so I think everyone should try to accept it.
Kahran Ramsus Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 It is a nuisance, but it isn't too bad. What really affects my enjoyment is editing Jesse Ventura out of his commentaries. If they can't use him, then they should just redub it completely with their modern guys because hearing Vince talk to himself with awkward pauses just ruins the match. I'd rather just push the mute button.
Vampiro69 Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 It is a nuisance, but it isn't too bad. What really affects my enjoyment is editing Jesse Ventura out of his commentaries. If they can't use him, then they should just redub it completely with their modern guys because hearing Vince talk to himself with awkward pauses just ruins the match. I'd rather just push the mute button. Total agreement right here. The bluring is distracting at times but usually I am focusing on the participants so I sort of tune out the bluring. The Ventura annoucing is horrible. When Schiavone would be partnered up with him we get dead spots on the commentary for periods of 15-20 seconds which bugs me, especially when Tony would ask him a question. This bugs me more then the blurring of the logo.
DrVenkman PhD Posted October 20, 2008 Report Posted October 20, 2008 bob echos my thoughts here. It's annoying but nothing is going to change it, so we must move on. They've been doing it for 6 years now.
Thanks for the Fish Posted October 21, 2008 Report Posted October 21, 2008 It makes me want to shoot my self in the face.
Jaxxson Mayhem Posted October 21, 2008 Report Posted October 21, 2008 I think we should boycott the world wildlife fund by hunting down as many panda bears and polar bears as humanly possible. All while starting forest fires.
MillenniumMan831 Posted October 21, 2008 Report Posted October 21, 2008 The only time it actively annoys me is at an event like WMX7 where there are just scratch WWF logos everywhere. A typical Raw match has WWF logos mainly on the buckles and maybe the announce table. But at X7 or X8, there are more shirts w/ logos, signs w/ WWF on them, logos on the ring skirts, ect. But whatever.
ChrisMWaters Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Posted October 21, 2008 Blurring doesn't bother me, despite what my first post would indicate. It's just I prefer, if possible, non-blurred material. I mean, I know I can never get an unblurred DVD of Royal Rumble 1999, so I deal with it. WrestleMania XV had the original, unblurred, so I cut bait and got it. I'm adjustable though.
Jericholic82 Posted October 21, 2008 Report Posted October 21, 2008 In short, I hate it, it's really annoying and distracting to me.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now