I've gotta disagree. Hockey in Raleigh is bad for the game. And hockey in Greensboro for those two years before the RBC Center was a hideous blemish on the game. Talk about a poorly attended small-market team.
I'm willing to bet that the Whalers would've been able to get a new arena sooner or later, maybe working out some deal with UConn basketball to share the building. And of COURSE we all love the Whalers: green and blue sweaters, Brass Bonanza...classic stuff. Like Tim Meadows once said on SNL when he was happy about the hockey strike ending, "The Whalers are fly, man, the Hartford Whalers are fly."
Seeing as Winnipeg just got a new downtown arena, I'm sure had the Jets stuck around, they would've gotten the new building. Maybe not in 1996, but somewhere along the way, before '04. Quebec City is harder to gauge, especially since I agree that the Avalanche have been a success, but the truth of the matter is that Denver was slated to get an expansion team anyway, and we could've easily had both teams in the league. But I'm sure that the 1996 Cup win would've swayed the provincial government to help the Nords out a bit.
I think that if the NHL hadn't gotten out of hand with player salaries, then the system would have accomodated all eight, perhaps even nine, Canadian teams. In the end, Manitoba is where people can and do play hockey, Arizona is not. New England is a hockey haven, the Mid-Atlantic belongs to college basketball. The NHL failed because they did not stay within their means.