Cheech Tremendous Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 It always struck me as a marketing thing. Like adding a 'Z' to Taz or whatever, Sycho Sid was probably just a little more cutting edge than Psycho. Personally I think they should have just kept the Vicious name.
PILLS! PILLS! PILLS! Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I always though that the extra Z was to avoid a lawsuit form Warner Bros.
King Kamala Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 It always struck me as a marketing thing. Like adding a 'Z' to Taz or whatever, Sycho Sid was probably just a little more cutting edge than Psycho. Personally I think they should have just kept the Vicious name. I don't know why this happened but Sid Justice changing his name to Sycho Sid in his 2nd WWF run led to the one other wrestling fan in my 2nd grade class to believe that Sid Justice and Sycho Sid were too entirely different people...the two, however, were related! Man, wrestling getting popular in '97/'98 was a godsend because it meant I didn't have to hang out with dopes like that if I wanted to talk about last night's RAW.
Cheech Tremendous Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I always though that the extra Z was to avoid a lawsuit form Warner Bros. Oh, that could be true. But you know what I mean w/r/t to WWE's marketing department adding z's and what not to names (see: Hardy Boyz, Dudley Boyz) so that they can copyright them. I don't think there was anything to the Sycho name other than trying to do something unique for marketing purposes.
bob_barron Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Yea- it became Tazz so they could copyright it, just like with Road Dogg and Badd Ass Billy Gunn.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I've told this story before but a claim Joe Legend made to some wrestling students was WWE thought trademarking "Rhino" would be a problem due to the Marvel character so they were going to call him 'Mary'. Rhino called is buddy Joe in a panic, so Mr. Legend suggested they go with 'Rhyno' ala 'Chyna'.
Slickster Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 WTF. That story makes no sense at all. I'd assume Legend was ribbing the students or something, because it would make no sense to name a guy you intend to push 'Mary.'
Cheech Tremendous Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Mary's a stupid name. They should have called him Sue.
Enigma Posted January 15, 2009 Report Posted January 15, 2009 Haha, oh the woes of Test. He was indeed supposed to be the last-minute replacement for Austin at the Survivor Series and win the title. Too bad he broke his nose in that match with HHH he had the night of his wedding. Then he tried to come back too soon and broke his nose again in his first match back. Horrible luck. Although I guess getting to fuck Stacy Keibler and Kelly Kelly is a good redemption.
YourKock'sReallyGreat Posted January 18, 2009 Report Posted January 18, 2009 How come WM2 was at 3 venues and how come they haven't done it again?
bob_barron Posted January 18, 2009 Report Posted January 18, 2009 Because Starrcade 85 was at 2 venues. They haven't done it again, because it was a logistical nightmare, and Wrestlemania 2 sucked.
Enigma Posted January 19, 2009 Report Posted January 19, 2009 To be fair, with technology the way it is, it would probably be a hell of a lot easier to do that today as opposed to the mid-80s.
BruteSquad_BRODY Posted January 19, 2009 Report Posted January 19, 2009 Now you have to have a hard enough time to make one good blockbuster card, much less 2 or 3
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted January 20, 2009 Report Posted January 20, 2009 WM 2 worked at the time because it was commonplace to go to an arena/theatre for a closed circuit show. PPV wasn't tremendously widespread then, so the appeal was not only a live card, but a CC broadcast of the rest of the event. It might be worth another shot with the brand extension though. One card for raw, another for Smackdown.
Hasbeen2 Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 A funny sign I just noticed at the start of WM 18, when RVD was coming to the ring: "65,000 people, only 1 X-Pac fan"
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 Where are people getting the idea that Test was slotted for Big Show's spot at the Survivor Series in 1999 and was going to win the WWF title?
TheFranchise Posted January 22, 2009 Report Posted January 22, 2009 I assume the spot Test had at the time, needing somebody for the WWF Title match, someone associated with Stephanie McMahon and had history with HHH, he was the logical person from a kayfabe standpoint.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 29, 2009 Report Posted January 29, 2009 Others who received try-outs at the various Texas tapings included Brian Lee (who looked good), Kevin Von Erich (who it appears will be hired but nobody has a clue as to why--actually I do--they can in newspaper ads just bill Von Erich vs. Martel and send both to the arenas figuring one will no-show every night but as long as the other makes it they won't have to change the card), Chris Adams, Sir Charles (Charles Wright aka Soul Taker doing a British gimmick that may turn into a voodoo man gimmick) and Ron & Don Harris. Supposedly they liked the Harris Brothers although it seemed Charles and Von Erich have the best shot at employment. WWF found itself in some hot water over an incident in Vancouver during a Bushwhackers vs. Beverly Brothers match. British Columbia gay activist Ken Walker demanded an apology from the WWF over the "Faggot" chants by Bushwhackers and portrayal of the Genius character. "They sent the message that it's okay to abuse gays and make them an object of hatred." The WWF verbally apologized to Walker but it's gone farther as Vancouver City Hall has asked the WWF to send in a written apology for the behavior of the Bushwhackers. 12/7 in Denver drew 2,100 as British Bulldog pinned Barbarian (Mel Phillips took a big bump from Barbarian which he was none too pleased about)
TMC1982 Posted January 31, 2009 Report Posted January 31, 2009 It's awfully unusual if you ask me for WWE to have their biggest show of the year take place at the same location two years in row. The only logical answer that I could find was to sell the whole Hogan-Savage angle (i.e. returning to the "scene of the crime" so to speak). I wouldn't necessarily consider Trump Plaza in Atlantic City, NJ to be the worst WrestleMania site ever (it was however, a considerable step down from the Pontiac Silverdome or the Toronto SkyDome in-between). The Hartford Civic Center (WrestleMania XI), Caeser's Palace (WrestleMania IX), and the three location set up for WrestleMania 2 ought to rank up there on the list of "Worst WrestleMania Venues Ever".
TMC1982 Posted January 31, 2009 Report Posted January 31, 2009 I wish that someday, Vince and company will bring this theme ("The Grand Spectacle") back. It has a very timeless, but still epic appeal to it. It kind of reminds me of the from the early 1990s (around the tail end of them covering the NFC package) in it's simple, yet extremely catchy and powerful in its appeal. The first WrestleMania used "Easy Lover" (by Phil Collins and Phillip Bailey) as it's time. While that song (along with Aretha Franklin's "Who's Zoomin' Who?" from WrestleMania III) is great in its own right, it's still for the most part, carrying "'80s centric" vibe behind its appeal. Even the "Wrestlemania Rap" (which would become Linda McMahon's theme) from 1993-1998 feels a bit dated, due to its Michael Jackson, "Black or White" sound. Now a days, WWE's formula seems to be to randomly get some hard rock band (like Limp Bizkit for example) to do the theme regardless of whether or not it feels relevant to WrestleMania.
HarleyQuinn Posted February 2, 2009 Report Posted February 2, 2009 I thought these rating notes were interesting... Numbers came from Wrestling Information Archive - Raw's First "Explosion" Ratings Wise: April 6th, 1998 (Jumped from a 3.8 the week before to a 4.7 that show) - Raw's First "Peak" Ratings Wise: April 28th, 1998 - May 18th, 1998 (Hit ratings of 5.7, 5.5, 4.3, and 5.3) - Raw's Second "Peak" Ratings Wise: November 9th, 1998 - December 14th, 1998 (Hit ratings of 5.0, 5.5, 4.9, 5.0, 5.15, and 5.2) - Raw's First Surreal Eye Popping Numbers: May 10th, 1999 - June 28th, 1999 (Hit at least 6.7 on 5 of their 7 shows) - Raw's Subsequent Demise: August 28th, 2000 (Dropped from 5.9 and 6.2 the previous two weeks to a 4.9 that show) - Raw's Low Point: December 24th, 2007 where they registered a 2.5
Beto Chavez Posted February 2, 2009 Report Posted February 2, 2009 Flair suffered the ear injury when IIRC the Ultimate Warrior potatoed him during one of their house show matches. I believe the injury is also what led to Bret getting the belt.
Diamonddust Posted February 2, 2009 Report Posted February 2, 2009 It's awfully unusual if you ask me for WWE to have their biggest show of the year take place at the same location two years in row. The only logical answer that I could find was to sell the whole Hogan-Savage angle (i.e. returning to the "scene of the crime" so to speak). I wouldn't necessarily consider Trump Plaza in Atlantic City, NJ to be the worst WrestleMania site ever (it was however, a considerable step down from the Pontiac Silverdome or the Toronto SkyDome in-between). The Hartford Civic Center (WrestleMania XI), Caeser's Palace (WrestleMania IX), and the three location set up for WrestleMania 2 ought to rank up there on the list of "Worst WrestleMania Venues Ever". I'm pretty certain Trump wanted it there the next year after IV, and that's why they went back. As for worst spot, I'd say Hartford by a landslide. At least Las Vegas, Chicago, New York (Even if it was Long Island), and Los Angeles were major markets.
The Tino Standard Posted February 3, 2009 Report Posted February 3, 2009 I wish that someday, Vince and company will bring this theme ("The Grand Spectacle") back. It has a very timeless, but still epic appeal to it. It kind of reminds me of the from the early 1990s (around the tail end of them covering the NFC package) in it's simple, yet extremely catchy and powerful in its appeal. Holy shit, I haven't heard that theme in years. Freaking awesome.
PILLS! PILLS! PILLS! Posted February 4, 2009 Report Posted February 4, 2009 It's awfully unusual if you ask me for WWE to have their biggest show of the year take place at the same location two years in row. The only logical answer that I could find was to sell the whole Hogan-Savage angle (i.e. returning to the "scene of the crime" so to speak). I wouldn't necessarily consider Trump Plaza in Atlantic City, NJ to be the worst WrestleMania site ever (it was however, a considerable step down from the Pontiac Silverdome or the Toronto SkyDome in-between). The Hartford Civic Center (WrestleMania XI), Caeser's Palace (WrestleMania IX), and the three location set up for WrestleMania 2 ought to rank up there on the list of "Worst WrestleMania Venues Ever". I'm pretty certain Trump wanted it there the next year after IV, and that's why they went back. As for worst spot, I'd say Hartford by a landslide. At least Las Vegas, Chicago, New York (Even if it was Long Island), and Los Angeles were major markets. The outdoor Caesar's Palace venue was really cool. Hartford is easily the worst place they've ever chosen to run their flagship PPV.
BruteSquad_BRODY Posted February 12, 2009 Report Posted February 12, 2009 The Oct. 2 1995 RAW had a 1900 number for "Is OJ Guilty" Classy. Also RAW had Barry Horowitz vs HHH opposing Nitros Lex Luger vs Randy Savage and Eddy vs Dean Malenko *head slap*
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now