Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest AT67

Wrestlescale

Recommended Posts

Guest AT67

Cool test that determines your booking style.

 

www.talkpw.com/wrestlescale

 

Here's what I got:

 

Wrestlescale - Results -8.jpg

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2005

 

That's what I got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i got this:

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got -3

 

You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: WCW 1993

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smues
I got -3

 

You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: WCW 1993

 

Cheetum the evil midget and Sid in flip-flops. YES!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smues

Wrestlescale - Results

-6.jpg

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-9.jpg

 

You are a fierce wrestling traditionalist. You cringe when you hear the words 'sports-entertainment' are mentioned and you mantain the fact that the wrestling matches are what sell tickets and keep the business going.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: MACW 70/80s

 

 

I don't cringe from all sports entertainment, just the crap like, "Oh no, there's an illegitimate McMahon child on the loose!"

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

0.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2002

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

-3.jpg

 

You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: WCW 1993

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-5.jpg

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

-7.jpg

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2005

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i got this:

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

This is what I got as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

1.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2005

 

Should I be ashamed I got the first TNA 2005?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

-6.jpg

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

This seems to be the result that comes up more than others.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

1.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2005

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: ECW 1996

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell?

 

-9.jpg

 

You are a fierce wrestling traditionalist. You cringe when you hear the words 'sports-entertainment' are mentioned and you mantain the fact that the wrestling matches are what sell tickets and keep the business going.

 

Most similar booker: Ole Anderson--- This is a bad thing, isn't it?

Most similar promotion: MACW 70/80s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am

 

Wrestlescale - Results

 

2.jpg

 

You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: ECW 1998

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

-7.jpg

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2005

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I guess the Omni is my home arena.

Wrestlescale - Results

 

-9.jpg

 

You are a fierce wrestling traditionalist. You cringe when you hear the words 'sports-entertainment' are mentioned and you mantain the fact that the wrestling matches are what sell tickets and keep the business going.

 

Most similar booker: Ole Anderson

Most similar promotion: MACW 70/80s

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

0.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2002

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

1.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2005

 

I'm appeased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great. Raza and I are alike.

Yes, watch wrestling for the sport aspect, hate all celebrity involvement, shoot interviews does nothing but hurt the business!

 

Walk the line, dude!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a +1.

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: TNA 2005

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

-1.jpg

 

You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.

 

Most similar booker: Paul Heyman

Most similar promotion: ECW 1996

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrestlescale - Results

 

4.jpg

 

You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.

 

Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff

Most similar promotion: TNA 2007

 

Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the same as most people here:

 

You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.

 

Most similar booker: Jim Cornette

Most similar promotion: ROH 2007

 

Funny, because I've never watched any ROH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×