Damaramu 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 I kind of like the red colored jerseys. I like Louisville's colors too. I mean I know they aren't changing the red but the red pants and just plain red jersey are kind of cool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AboveAverage484 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 So he's blacker and more pissed off? Whatta radicial change this is. I don't know why but that made laugh, maybe because I was thinking the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
starvenger 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 (edited) There's already a Cardinals team in baseball, just gut the team and come up with more of a desert bird. You do know that the baseball team named themselves after the football team, right? [edit] Wait, I checked their history. I was wrong - got the Browns and Cardinals all mixed together. Shut up, Starvenger.[/edit] Anyways, change the logo all you want. It means nothing if your team still sucks. Edited January 27, 2005 by starvenger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 There's already a Cardinals team in baseball, just gut the team and come up with more of a desert bird. You do know that the baseball team named themselves after the football team, right? [edit] Wait, I checked their history. I was wrong - got the Browns and Cardinals all mixed together. Shut up, Starvenger.[/edit] Anyways, change the logo all you want. It means nothing if your team still sucks. I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but the St. Louis Browns preceded the St. Louis Cardinals. The St. Louis Brown Stockings first appeared in the National Association in 1875. The current Cardinals were actually the former Browns until 1898, when they changed their name to the Perfectos for one season, and then to the Cardinals in 1900. The team commonly known as the Browns debuted in St. Louis in 1902, before moving to Baltimore in 1953. The football Browns first appeared in 1950, and my guess is that they were named after Head Coach Paul Brown. The football Cardinals of course are one of only two teams that have played in the NFL since its inception. They started in Chicago, moved to St. Louis in 1960, and moved to Phoenix in 1988. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MARTYEWR 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 The football Browns first appeared in 1950, and my guess is that they were named after Head Coach Paul Brown. The football Cardinals of course are one of only two teams that have played in the NFL since its inception. They started in Chicago, moved to St. Louis in 1960, and moved to Phoenix in 1988. Small correction: The Cleveland Browns began in 1946 in the old All-America Football Conference (AAFC). The AAFC lasted only four seasons (1946-49) and the Browns won all four championships of the defunct league. The Browns, along with the Baltimore Colts and San Francisco 49ers, joined the NFL in 1950. They had most of the same team for the next 6 years, went to the NFL championship in each of those years, and won 3 of them. And yes, the Browns were named after Paul Brown. As for the Cardinals, believe it or not, they were known first as the Racine Cardinals. They actually used "Racine" because they were located on Racine Avenue in Chicago. They switched to Chicago Cardinals in 1920, but Racine Cardinals is the team's inaugural name from 1898 to 1920. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 Imagine.... all these years, and no championships to speak for of the Cardinals (Super Bowl era anyways, I know they won some titles in the 20's.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MARTYEWR 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2005 The Cardinals won their lone known NFL Championship in 1947. Their only other NFL Championship was a heavily disputed one in 1925: Led by Paddy Driscoll, the Cardinals won a disputed championship in 1925. The controversy arose out of a December 6 game at Chicago between the Cardinals and the Pottsville Maroons that was hyped by O'Brien and the Chicago newspapers as being for the NFL championship. The Cardinals were 9-1-1 going into the game, while Pottsville was 9-2-0. The Maroons won the game, 21-7, and considered themselves league champions as a result. A week later, though, NFL President Joe Carr declared that the Pottsville franchise had been forfeited because the team played a game against the Notre Dame All-Stars in Philadelphia, thus invading the territory of the Frankford Yellow Jackets. Meanwhile. O'Brien desperately wanted a game against the Chicago Bears during their barnstorming tour with Red Grange. To keep the team intact, and to pad its record, he scheduled two more games, against the Milwaukee Badgers and the Hammond Pros. The Cardinals won both games, running their record to 11-2-1. That was good enough to win the league championship over Pottsville, which finished at 10-2-0, but it didn't really matter, since Pottsville was no longer in the league. Nevertheless, the Maroons and their fans insisted they had won the title. Because of the controversy, O'Brien refused to accept the championship, but the Cardinals went into the NFL record books as 1925 champions, anyway. http://www.hickoksports.com/history/cardinalsnfl.shtml O'Brien, btw, is Chris O'Brien, a painting contractor, who was the organizer and manager of the Cardinals since inauguration. So basically, the very top guy of the organization refused the championship under those circumstances. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
converge241 0 Report post Posted January 28, 2005 any pics of the unis to post? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Well, it doesn't seem like there's any real word on the new uni's but they did show what I guess is the NFC uni's for this year's Pro Bowl. Oh, and this article is full of unintentional comedy.. Cards Brush Up Bird Associated Press, TEMPE, Ariz. -- The Arizona Cardinals have given their old bird a makeover. The Cardinal head that has served as the team's logo since 1960 -- when the franchise moved from Chicago to St. Louis -- has been subtly transformed into a sleeker, meaner creature. The updated version was unveiled with great fanfare at Cardinals headquarters on Thursday. "A tough bird," team owner Bill Bidwill said. "Hopefully it will be worn by tougher and faster and meaner players." Yet to come is what Cardinals vice president Michael Bidwill called "a revolutionary" change in the team's uniforms, to be shown this spring. The old Cardinal logo was a roundhead bird derisively referred to as a "parakeet." The new version has decidedly more evil eyes and a menacing expression. "The outline is in black," Michael Bidwill said. "We've made the beak much more predatory and much more aggressive. The face is much more streamlined. It's faster looking. The eye has been described as mean, we'll say tough. We've taken tail feathers and given them speed, as well." The new beak is gold, while the old one was yellow. "As they say, it's not the size of the bird in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the bird," coach Dennis Green said. "The cardinal is a small bird, but it can be a very aggressive bird. That's the idea." Several prominent Cardinals -- including Josh McCown, Larry Fitzgerald and Leonard Davis -- modeled apparel with the new logo. With his rural Texas background, McCown was asked if he was something of an expert on shape of birds and shape of bird heads. "The only birds I know about are the duck and the dove and the quail, birds that you shoot," the Cardinals quarterback said. "You're not really supposed to shoot cardinals. I don't know if I'd shoot this bird. It looks pretty mean. This bird might pull a gun out and shoot right back at you." The changes are part of the team's preparation for its move into a new stadium, set for completion by the 2006 season opener. Defensive end Bertrand Berry will wear the new logo in next month's Pro Bowl. The Arizona EVIL PARAKEETS They're my sleeper pick for next year. No, seriously. With McCown they kept it close with several of the top teams in the league. Without him, they were getting whomped on. Who knows why Denny Green didn't want to give him a chance? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Satanico Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Ha...that article reminds me of Monty Python for some reason. "Well, that's no ordinary rabbit." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest eBayBrison Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Yeah..... my father is painting the Cardinals stadium and he says that it's massive! I'm excited to see how it is, especially with it's roll out turf which can be rolled outdoors for practices and what not. Brison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Yeah..... my father is painting the Cardinals stadium and he says that it's massive! It'll look even more massive when it's half-filled on a regular basis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MARTYEWR 0 Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Yeah..... my father is painting the Cardinals stadium and he says that it's massive! I'm excited to see how it is, especially with it's roll out turf which can be rolled outdoors for practices and what not. Brison I have a question about the Cardinals' stadium: How are the seats going to be? Because, and I may sound silly here, but I think a big reason for the Cards' lack of attendance is the big, shiny metal benches that are used as seats in the stadium. In fact, they take up a good chunkload of the stadium. Imagine the Arizona sun and heat shining onto those things and how THAT would feel when you're sitting there! I remember on Countdown one time, on the Mayne Event, they had a cute feature about those seats, and how you could almost literally fry eggs on them. Surely, the seats in the new stadium have got to be better than this! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted January 28, 2005 Well that goes to show how much the Cardinal organization appreciates their fans when they substitute actual seating for hamburger grills. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hektik 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 The Cardinals new uniforms Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Are team names on the jerseys usually that inconspicuous? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MARTYEWR 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 I don't like the additional white stripe on the sleeves. Additionals like these on jerseys make them look like Arena League-level jerseys. The rest of the two jerseys look sharp, but lose that white stripe. Less is more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shadow Report post Posted April 21, 2005 nearly identical to the falcons. Way to be original. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 When the jersey and pants are the same color and the color isn't white, it looks pretty stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the max 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Is that modeling picture a screencap from a security video or what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 At least they'll suck in the lastest style now... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 nearly identical to the falcons. Way to be original. BUT ITS IN RED!. I think the team should go with the trend and call themselves the PHX Football Cardinals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Are team names on the jerseys usually that inconspicuous? Yes, or often times not there at all. I don't like the additional white stripe on the sleeves. Additionals like these on jerseys make them look like Arena League-level jerseys. The rest of the two jerseys look sharp, but lose that white stripe. Less is more. The white stripes on the sleeves look kinda crappy there, but from a side view when the jersey is on, my assumption is that it's supposed to mimic the Arizona state flag: When the jersey and pants are the same color and the color isn't white, it looks pretty stupid. I disagree. The Ravens' all-black uniform is pretty cool, and I can dig it when Carolina does the same in either of their colors. Same with the Dolphins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted April 21, 2005 nearly identical to the falcons. Way to be original. BUT ITS IN RED!. I think the team should go with the trend and call themselves the PHX Football Cardinals. The Falcons have red alternates, too.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lomasmoney 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Booooo. White pants with the red jerseys and I would be feeling them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Banter 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Here are some better pictures: I like all the variations except for the red/red. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Baron 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Agreed. New look, same team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 Woah, Warner's with the Cards now? I really need to start paying attention to the off-season... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Flyboy Report post Posted April 21, 2005 They really look too much like the new Falcons' jerseys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Banter 0 Report post Posted April 21, 2005 They really look too much like the new Falcons' jerseys. There are plenty of differences: -The striping on the pants -The shade of red -And, uhh, the Card's logo will appear above the players names on the back of the jerseys. -And, well that's about it. The truth is they look a lot like the Falcons jerseys. If you really want to get nitpicky the white's look simlilar in style to the Bills jerseys: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites