Scroby Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 From Mike Johnson: Spike TV has continued to be pleased with TNA's performance and according to one source at the network, there are already internal discussions about how to better utilize TNA in the coming months. first thing to do is give them TWO FUCKING HOURS. No No, first move them up to the 10:00 slot, then give them two fucking hours.
USC Wuz Robbed! Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 First they have to show better usage of the one hour before they get two.
TNABaddboi Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 First they have to show better usage of the one hour before they get two. IMO, they have. Since they moved to Thursday and went to the three match formula, the shows have been much better and have gotten better reviews. And the ratings have gone up too. I think they could handle an extra 30 minutes at this point.
Astro101 Posted June 28, 2006 Report Posted June 28, 2006 Yea, they've been using the hour pretty nicely. If TNA gets two hours, I think the pacing would be much better than than the frantic one we're used to.
ryankeast Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 Roderick Strong is gone from TNA. Strong briefly returned to television two months ago after serving a suspension due to that ROH incident, but he was not brought back. Also, his profile has been removed from the official TNA website. Source - Pro Wrestling Torch
Bruce Blank Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 No big surprise there - he'll make more out of staying with ROH (I don't mean cash I mean push/exposure/titles)
Astro101 Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 Austin Aries is still there last time I checked, though.
The Decemberists Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 Shame about Strong. I know some of the big ROH marks would have objected, but what on earth stopped TNA from just re-doing Generation Next is beyond me. A good long feud of Shelley, Strong and Aries vs Styles, Daniels and Sabin could've been awesome.
Dobbs 3K Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 They have enough ROH guys as it is. One less won't hurt TNA at this point.
LJSexay Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 noooo!!!! ... out of the ROH guys in TNA, he was one of my favorites.... gahhh. That bites.
Fro Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 You can now download Impact episodes for $1.99 a pop on ITunes
2GOLD Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 You can now download Impact episodes for $1.99 a pop on ITunes Yeah, that was a pretty cool announcement. I wonder if they get any money from that.
goldengreek Posted June 29, 2006 Report Posted June 29, 2006 Shame about Strong. I know some of the big ROH marks would have objected, but what on earth stopped TNA from just re-doing Generation Next is beyond me. A good long feud of Shelley, Strong and Aries vs Styles, Daniels and Sabin could've been awesome. I concur
Star Ocean 3 Posted June 30, 2006 Report Posted June 30, 2006 You can now watch Impact for free on television.
Astro101 Posted June 30, 2006 Report Posted June 30, 2006 You can also watch Lost for free, but they still get bought.
Guest nokia Posted June 30, 2006 Report Posted June 30, 2006 I got this over at smartmarks's forum Roderick Strong is gone from TNA. Strong briefly returned to television two months ago after serving a suspension due to that ROH incident, but he was not brought back. Also, his profile has been removed from the official TNA website. * From Meltzer;Contract expired and he didn't want to sign a new deal.
luke-o Posted June 30, 2006 Report Posted June 30, 2006 Shame really, i liked Strong. I thought he and Aries worked really well as a tag team. from wrestlingexposed: This was posted on Matt Bentley’s official MySpace: “If you are interested in bringing me in to wrestle or for an autograph signing, please contact me through myspace and I will get back to you with my price and availability. I am looking to fill a few dates that I have free so please contact me ASAP to secure a spot. Thanks Matt Bentley” Looks like bentleys not going to be used for a while. Poor Traci.
Hunter's Torn Quad Posted July 2, 2006 Report Posted July 2, 2006 -The main event is the four way with Samoa Joe vs. Sting vs. Scott Steiner vs. Christian Cage. Jeff Jarrett is NOT wrestling on the next PPV. Jarrett will be headlining the 8/13 PPV show against the winner of the four-way. Da Meltz
Astro101 Posted July 2, 2006 Report Posted July 2, 2006 So...I guess TNA finally decided that it didn't make sense to punish JJ by having him face the winner that night.
Astro7x Posted July 2, 2006 Report Posted July 2, 2006 You can now watch Impact for free on television. It is? Last time I checked Impact was on cable, and I pay for cable. And not all cable providers have Spike TV, so I can see them wanting to be on iTunes for the few fans that really want to see it. I can't see how they can lose money from it. Even I have videos up on iTunes for free.
tommytomlin Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 If they're putting the Jarrett vs #1 Contender match on the following PPV, that seems to indicate to me that Joe is going to win the 4-Way? Having your hottest star win his title shot the same night he cashes it in would be a fun storyline, but it doesn't make good financial sense. If people know for sure that it's Joe vs Jarrett for the World Title at the next PPV, they're going to get way more buys.
Hawk 34 Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 If they're putting the Jarrett vs #1 Contender match on the following PPV, that seems to indicate to me that Joe is going to win the 4-Way? Having your hottest star win his title shot the same night he cashes it in would be a fun storyline, but it doesn't make good financial sense. If people know for sure that it's Joe vs Jarrett for the World Title at the next PPV, they're going to get way more buys. Sting Vs Joe would draw a better buy-rate. Giving Sting a flash title reign to drop it at BFG to Joe is the over-all best plan for the company.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 I agree with Hawk for a few reasons: 1. Sting vs. Joe with Joe winning the title is an actual good main event for there supposed biggest show of the year. 2. Sting's entire storyline in TNA has been to hurt JJ. Taking the title brings a nice resolve to that. 3. Christian becomes instantly better when he's proven right about Sting's hidden title aspirations for the last month (by the time Sting wins...it will be 3 months of slow build for the obvious Christian/Sting feud after Joe wins.).
TNABaddboi Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 I gotta agree with Hawk and BPS. Sting getting his one last glory run on top (a la HBK after Surivor Series 2003) would a great short term thing. I think we'll see Sting and Jarrett finally have their one on one match in August, while they milk Joe and Steiner one more time in a gimmick match (maybe Last Man Standing, so Steiner can pass out to the Clutch instead of tapping, since they still want to protect him). In September, Sting defends against Christian (he offers him a title shot to shut him up about the hidden aspirations), while Joe defeats Jarrett in a number one contenders match. Then we get to BFG with Joe and Sting on top.
GODSON Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 I would not even put the title on Joe this year. I feel like TNA is rushing things with Joe. Joe has not struggle yet, he's been doing everything with ease. Have Joe get pinned in tag matches first to at least make it seem like Joe has a chance of losing. Winning the title this soon just seems so predictable and rush. Besides, JJ vs. Joe for the title is better and bigger than Joe vs. Sting. 1.JJ is TNA number 1 heel which means more HEAT, 2. This been a dream match since 2004 when Joe was ROH champion and JJ was NWA champion, every smark and indy fan wanted too see Joe kick his ass. 3.JJ is still capable of having a damn near classic match if he's in the ring with the right opponent like Joe, Sting cannot. As for TNA, I think they should stay away from 2 HOURS. 2 hours means lots of filler stuff and longer James Gang/3d promos. I think TNA would be better serve if they keep Impact at one hour and add another show(Global Impact or Xplosion) on the weekends. They should follow the Raw/Action Zone format WWE had going for awhile. Have Impact as the storyline development show and Xplosion as the show with nothing but matches that was develop from Impact. WWE don't have a show with nothing but matches,now that's a true ALTERNATIVE. Impact can be move to 10 pm and have the replay come on at midnight that same night. Xplosion can come on at 11am and 11pm on Saturdays. I think TNA should make Bound For Glory/Impact a package deal for the people in Plymouth. Do the ppv and two Impact tapings on Sunday and Monday.
Hawk 34 Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 Jarrett isn't remotely close to being a bigger draw against Joe for BFG. You want to WAIT for the big money match? People have done that before and it bit them in the ass. It's not remotely close to being too early to "pulling the trigger" on Joe. Most promotions would have already put the title on Joe due to how over he is and how much of a star he is built to be. Why should Joe struggle? He is presented and brought as a unbeatable machine. You hand him losses even if just in tag matches, you strip away a key piece of his appeal. Sting Vs Joe is a bigger "dream" match for most fans these days because it'd be a better match-up. Jarrett isn't the true #1 heel. His heat is worse then X-Pac heat. Two hours would improve the show because the fast paced format forces them to cram 8 angles into a 42 minute time period. Ratings are up but the buyrates are down. People aren't buying the PPV's because all the angles are essentially rushed and they have no time to build them.
Astro7x Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 That's why TNA should be running at the most 6 PPVs a year, not 12...
AlaskanHero Posted July 3, 2006 Report Posted July 3, 2006 But people need to keep in mind that PPVs are their bread and butter, the only thing that actually gets them any significant financial gain. From a creative standpoint, 6 PPVs a year would be ideal, but they might not be able to afford to drop those 6 PPVs. On the other hand, having more time to build up their PPVs could result in bigger buyrates and offset the lose of those other 6 PPVs, but that's a big 'if'. It would be a bit of a risk, but sometimes risks are neccesary. Can't be afraid to go out on a limb, since that's where the fruit is and whatnot.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now