DrVenkman PhD Posted January 23, 2009 Author Report Posted January 23, 2009 But why is Mickie James involved? Is this all a rib on Earl and Dave Hebner?
MillenniumMan831 Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 I believe she caught Hacksaw up to no good and was going to rat on him (To whom I don't know) but instead Hacksaw let her in on the action.
Burning Pirate Ship Sex Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 That Goldman video really buries Hawkins and Ryder. Who? Miz and Morrison don't even recognize them as guys they lost their belts to! Everyone knows that the title belts were merely misplaced in the Palace of Wisdom. This accusation you make is nothing more than an oft-repeated slander, designed to diminish Miz and Morrison in the eyes of the general public
Shelton Benjamin outta f'in nowhere! Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 I believe she caught Hacksaw up to no good and was going to rat on him (To whom I don't know) but instead Hacksaw let her in on the action. If that's true, then, by all rights, IRS should be part of the group in the next segment. Two words: Hacksaw's Eleven.
BruteSquad_BRODY Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 I believe she caught Hacksaw up to no good and was going to rat on him (To whom I don't know) but instead Hacksaw let her in on the action. If that's true, then, by all rights, IRS should be part of the group in the next segment. Two words: Hacksaw's Eleven.
The Truthiness Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 http://www.wwe.com/content/media/video/vms...ry15-21/9172780 The New Dirt Sheet is up featuring "The Colons".
Diamonddust Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 For you history buffs, today is the 25th anniversary of one of the most important matches in WWE and Wrestling History: 25 years ago today, Hulk Hogan beat The Iron Sheik and the rest, well, is history.
TheFranchise Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 I've been wanting to ask this for a while, and since you make reference to a 25th anniversary.. why are they hying WrestleMania 25 as 'the 25th anniversary of WrestleMania'? Surely WrestleMania 26 would be the 25th anniversary.
The Tino Standard Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 I've been wanting to ask this for a while, and since you make reference to a 25th anniversary.. why are they hying WrestleMania 25 as 'the 25th anniversary of WrestleMania'? Surely WrestleMania 26 would be the 25th anniversary. YES. THANK YOU. The NFL made the same mistake with the Super Bowl a few years ago, touting SB 40 as "the 40th anniversary of the Super Bowl." Wrong, wrong, wrong.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 It's not like this precedent wasn't already set. Mania X, Mania XV, Mania XX... it's just how it goes.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 I can't resist posting this link: http://fans.wwe.com/go/thread/view/701/130...tling_joins_WWE
DCH Posted January 25, 2009 Report Posted January 25, 2009 I enjoyed the read Venk, quite interesting.
muzz Posted January 25, 2009 Report Posted January 25, 2009 That guys sig is way too big, and stupid.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 25, 2009 Author Report Posted January 25, 2009 It's also worth noting that he spells "Jerichoholic" in his username (he got it right in the sig...) the same way a certain TSM resident does.
Twisted Intestine Posted January 25, 2009 Report Posted January 25, 2009 I can't find where the original post was about WWE.com putting up the review on The Wrestler or Vince wanting him for WM, but I saw Kamala mention it in "The Wrestler" folder and it prompted me to ask this question. (I thought here would be a more appropriate place.) Vince changed his mind on the movie, or the internets were wrong about his initial reaction? All I ever saw was the one report saying he was furious, but no details ever about why or who he told, so I'm thinking maybe that report was bull. Not that it would surprise me if he did change his opinion on it once it got oscar nominated either.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 25, 2009 Author Report Posted January 25, 2009 It won a Golden Globe and has Oscar noms, so they want to attach themselves to it for mainstream attention.
Dobbs 3K Posted January 25, 2009 Report Posted January 25, 2009 Yeah...it seems plausible that Vince really did hate the movie, but saw all the positive attention it's been getting, so he decided WWE should try to glom onto that. Which is kind of funny because my understanding of the movie (haven't had a chance to see it yet) is that it doesn't exactly paint the wrestling industry in a great light.
Obi Chris Kenobi Posted January 25, 2009 Report Posted January 25, 2009 Yeah...it seems plausible that Vince really did hate the movie, but saw all the positive attention it's been getting, so he decided WWE should try to glom onto that. Which is kind of funny because my understanding of the movie (haven't had a chance to see it yet) is that it doesn't exactly paint the wrestling industry in a great light. No it doesn't, even hints and shows about drug use, which in current light seems odd for WWE to side with if it is true. If they do work together, I can only see it confusing some of the younger fans if they go on to see the movie someway.
DrVenkman PhD Posted January 25, 2009 Author Report Posted January 25, 2009 But see, that's ROH and scummy indy guys. Remember, Vince and Hogan saved the wrestling world from smoke filled arenas.
luke-o Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 That guys sig is way too big, and stupid. It seems like everyone on there has a sig that's too big. List of wreslters I like~!
BHK Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 Is Kane the only notable long term person left in the company that hasn't gotten a world title reign that deserves one? I mean a real title reign. Not the one day reign back in 1998. Incidentally I attended that PPV.
dubq Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 I can't resist posting this link: http://fans.wwe.com/go/thread/view/701/130...tling_joins_WWE WHAZZ UP 416 AND 647!!!!! *hangs head in shame*
King Cucaracha Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 Is Kane the only notable long term person left in the company that hasn't gotten a world title reign that deserves one? I mean a real title reign. Not the one day reign back in 1998. Incidentally I attended that PPV. Are you counting the ECW Title?
DerangedHermit Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 Does anyone else get the continues "loading" screen whenever they watch videos on WWE.com? I'm assuming there's something I got to download but I'm not sure what I need to download. It's weird cause my computer upstairs doesn't get past the loading screen but my computer downstairs plays the video just fine. I get the "loading..." message as well. I just wait a bit and find it on youtube. Truth be told, I think Goldman's two episodes pretty much suck. It's like he's a kids show host, like he should be hosting "Double Dare" or something. Todd Pettengill with muscles.
BHK Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 Is Kane the only notable long term person left in the company that hasn't gotten a world title reign that deserves one? I mean a real title reign. Not the one day reign back in 1998. Incidentally I attended that PPV. Are you counting the ECW Title? No. I'm not. Although I can understand why some people would.
zappafrank Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 You know what's weird? I could have sworn that Dibiase had tattoos (esp. a back tattoo) like Orton at one point. Last night I was commenting to one of my friends how it's easy to mix them up at quick glance due in large part to the tattoos (I think it's b/c one of the announcers kept referring to one of them as the other), but then I noticed he didn't have anything on his back. I could have sworn he did at one point, b/c I remember thinking, "Oh, look, he has the modern version of the tough guy, completely unoriginal, tribal symbol upper arm tattoo." Like I said, weird.
Slickster Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 WWE One Night Stand is now WWE Extreme Rules (as seen on WWE.com).
EVIL~! alkeiper Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 If you don't count the ECW then Matt Hardy has made WWE appearances back to 1994 without holding a World Title, even for a fortnight.
haws bah gawd Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 If you don't count the ECW then Matt Hardy has made WWE appearances back to 1994 without holding a World Title, even for a fortnight. Pretty crazy when you put it in perspective like that. Even Jeff Hardy got a one-month "Thank You for Killing Yourself For Us For All These Years" run. Two years in a row, Jeff Hardy has now lost in a world title match at The Royal Rumble.
Recommended Posts