AntiLeaf33 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Got a -8 Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: SMW 90s Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chaosrage 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff Most similar promotion: WWF 1996 Um, what? WWF 1996 was nothing like Eric Bischoff. That makes no sense. I said I wanted frequent title changes and that controversy was important. Now if it had said WWF 1997, that would be right on target. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDH257 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Corey_Lazarus 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Me, Matt, and LLGC should book a promotion. Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: TNA 2002 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 I got +2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CorporateMankind Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are a moderate believer in sports-entertainment. You reject the idea of old-school wrestling but believe that wrestling ability still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that charisma must always take priority. Most similar booker: Vince McMahon Most similar promotion: WWE 2007 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Wow! That's pretty cool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 My main event would be a series of Dean Malenko vs Jerry Lynn matches throw in a few managers to do the talking and get quality announcers to call the action like early 90's JR, Tony Schiavonie, Jessie Ventura before Bischoff screwed up everything and it would be perfect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dobbs 3K 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 I think this thing kind of sucks. I don't see ECW '96 as being that traditional or sports based at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steviekick 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 i got this: You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 I got this as well. It's kind of funny because I really don't follow ROH at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Star Ocean 3 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Bill Watts Most similar promotion: WCW 1993 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cheech Tremendous 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff Most similar promotion: WCW 1996 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fartsauce 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Dutch Mantell Most similar promotion: TNA 2005 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Cucaracha 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dolfan483 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Got a +4 You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Dutch Mantell Most similar promotion: TNA 2007 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Buzz 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2007 You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Bill Watts Most similar promotion: WCW 1993 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisMWaters 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2007 You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Bill Watts Most similar promotion: WCW 1993 Looks like you're going to try and make a slave tag team then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest the_last_rites Report post Posted August 10, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Buzz 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2007 I wish it had said I was like Bill Watts, and then proceeded to say the promotion was UWF....instead I get WCW 1993. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skullman80 0 Report post Posted August 10, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlexPuma 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1998 --- I've got ECW '98... I guess endless RVD Title reigns, never ending matches between Super Crazy / Tajiri, and Taz as an unstoppable SoB is my thing. Which it is YAY! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 If Russo is a +8 then who would be +10 and who would be the old school -1? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vanhalen 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Thats actually very accurate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 If Russo is a +8 then who would be +10 and who would be the old school -1? From the result page. The most extreme-right promotion ever was probably WCW in 2000. The booking was completely entertainment orientated with angles and character taking priority and matches having constant run-ins and swerves. On the otherhand, the most extreme-left promotion was likely to be Mid-Atlantic Championship Wrestling in the 70/80s which was traditional in all aspects. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrVenkman PhD 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 I tried to purposely get a +10 but ended up with a +9. Hmm.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papacita 0 Report post Posted August 11, 2007 You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Got any feedback on the poll? We would love to hear it so we can improve the Wrestlescale project. Click here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rendclaw 0 Report post Posted August 13, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 It makes sense, because I always preferred guys who can put on a good match over guys who can talk, though I acknowledged that the ability to talk is important. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
luke-o 0 Report post Posted August 13, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haws bah gawd 0 Report post Posted August 13, 2007 Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: TNA 2002 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites